Electrical Transport — Macrocycle-Based Metal-Organic Frameworks with NO2-Driven On/Off Switch of Conductivity

3 measurement groups · 14 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

MOF A-covered screen-printed gold electrode sheet · Electrode

AC impedance measured before and after NO2 adsorption on a thin layer of MOF A.

Temperature: 298
Atmosphere: before/after NO2 gas adsorption
Geometry: thin MOF A layer/electrode
Context: pristine and guest-loaded states compared
Measurement source: main p.4 · Results and Discussion · Figure S18 and Table S6

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
MOF A conductivity after NO2 (main-text AC impedance calculation)Marked as a best value within this paper	about 8.4 × 10^-4 S/cm	0.084 S/m	about	Text Approximate	main p.4 · Results and Discussion · Figure S18
MOF A conductivity after NO2 (SI Table S6 summary)	1.9×10^-3 S cm^-1	0.19 S/m	—	SI Table Rounded Reported	SI p.25 · Table S6 · Table S6
MOF A conductivity before NO2 (main-text AC impedance calculation)Marked as a best value within this paper	about 1.3 × 10^-11 S/cm	1.3e-9 S/m	about	Text Approximate	main p.4 · Results and Discussion · Figure S18
MOF A conductivity before NO2 (SI Table S6 summary)	3.0×10^-12 S cm^-1	3e-10 S/m	—	SI Table Rounded Reported	SI p.25 · Table S6 · Table S6

MOF A-covered screen-printed gold electrode sheet · Electrode

MOF A-covered gold electrode vacuumed; 0.5 V; NO2 flow introduced for 16 min then evacuated; three cycles measured.

Temperature: 298
Atmosphere: NO2 flow then vacuum/evacuation
Geometry: MOF film on screen-printed gold electrode
Context: pristine MOF A film switching to NO2-loaded state
Measurement source: main pp.4 and 6 · Results and Discussion; Electrochemical Test of NO2 Adsorption · Figure 5

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
Current after 2 min NO2 exposure	2 µA within 2 min	0.000002 A	—	Text Rounded Reported	main p.4 · Results and Discussion · Figure 5
Initial current before NO2	about 30 nA	3e-8 A	about	Text Approximate	main p.4 · Results and Discussion · Figure 5
Maximum current under NO2Marked as a best value within this paper	maximum 55 µA at saturation in 16 min	0.000055 A	—	Text Rounded Reported	main p.4 · Results and Discussion · Figure 5
Reversible cycling performance retainedMarked as a best value within this paper	100% performance after three reversible cycles	—	—	Text Rounded Reported	main p.4 · Results and Discussion · Figure S16
Complete NO2 on/off cycle time	about 18 min	1080 s	about	Text Approximate	main p.4 · Results and Discussion · Figure S16
Conductive-to-insulating recovery time after NO2 evacuationMarked as a best value within this paper	about 42 s	—	about	Text Approximate	main p.4 · Results and Discussion · Figure 5
MOF A resistance after 2 min NO2	2.5 × 10^5 Ω	—	—	Text Rounded Reported	main p.4 · Results and Discussion · Figure 5
MOF A resistance after NO2 saturationMarked as a best value within this paper	9.1 × 10^3 Ω	—	—	Text Rounded Reported	main p.4 · Results and Discussion · Figure 5
MOF A resistance before NO2	5.7 × 10^11 Ω	—	—	Text Rounded Reported	main p.4 · Results and Discussion · Figure 5

MOF A-covered screen-printed gold electrode sheet · Electrode

MOF A and A-NO2 measured in Lake Shore TTPX Cryogenic Probe Station at 25 deg C and 1 bar.

Temperature: 298
Atmosphere: 1 bar
Geometry: probe station; film/device geometry not further specified
Context: MOF A vs A-NO2
Measurement source: SI p.1 and p.22 · Materials and methods; Figure S19 caption · Figure S19

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
I-V conductance comparison	A-NO2 slope much higher than MOF A	—	—	Qualitative Qualitative	SI p.22 · Figure S19 discussion · Figure S19