Sensing Application — Proton-Conductive 3D LnIII Metal–Organic Frameworks for Formic Acid Impedance Sensing

Measurement evidence

Sensing Application

Proton-Conductive 3D LnIII Metal–Organic Frameworks for Formic Acid Impedance Sensing · Liu R.-L., Qu W.-T., Dou B.-H. et al. · Chemistry - An Asian Journal · 2020 · 182-190

4 measurement groups · 12 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

AC impedance response to formic acid vapour from aqueous formic acid

ZZU-1 tablet impedance sensor · Pellet

Home-made sensing device; tablets between Pt sheets; 25 deg C; 15 min exposure; pure water control

Temperature
298
Atmosphere
formic acid vapour generated from aqueous solutions
Geometry
tablet sandwiched between Pt sheets
Context
pristine framework
Measurement source
8 · Experimental Section - Gas-Sensing Characterization · Figure 8
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
ZZU-1 formic acid detection limitMarked as a best value within this paper0.012 MText
Exact Reported
6 · Results and Discussion · Figure 8
ZZU-1 formic acid linear response lower bound0.012-0.34 MText
Range
6 · Results and Discussion · Figures 8c and 8d
ZZU-1 formic acid linear response upper bound0.012-0.34 MText
Range
6 · Results and Discussion · Figures 8c and 8d
ZZU-1 response at 0.34 M formic acidapproximately 34 (R0/Ra)Visual Estimate
Approximate
6 · Results and Discussion · Figure 8c

selectivity and recycling response tests

ZZU-1 tablet impedance sensor · Pellet

Responses toward MeOH, n-hexane, benzene, toluene, formic acid, EtOH, acetone, acetic acid and butane at 25 deg C; recycling for formic acid response

Temperature
298
Atmosphere
VOC vapours and formic acid vapour
Geometry
tablet sandwiched between Pt sheets
Context
pristine framework
Measurement source
7 · Results and Discussion · Figure 9
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Six-day formic acid atmosphere stabilitysensitivity remained the same after 0.34 M formic acid atmosphere for six daysText
Exact Reported
6 · Results and Discussion · Figure S20
Formic acid response recyclingmaintained sensitivity for ten repetitionsText
Exact Reported
6 · Results and Discussion · Figures 9c and 9d
ZZU-1 formic acid selectivity responseapproximately 34, much higher than other VOCsVisual Estimate
Approximate
7 · Results and Discussion · Figure 9a

AC impedance response to formic acid vapour from aqueous formic acid

ZZU-2 tablet impedance sensor · Pellet

Home-made sensing device; tablets between Pt sheets; 25 deg C; 15 min exposure; pure water control

Temperature
298
Atmosphere
formic acid vapour generated from aqueous solutions
Geometry
tablet sandwiched between Pt sheets
Context
pristine framework
Measurement source
8 · Experimental Section - Gas-Sensing Characterization · Figure 8
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
ZZU-2 formic acid detection limitMarked as a best value within this paper0.02 MText
Exact Reported
6 · Results and Discussion · Figure 8
ZZU-2 formic acid linear response lower bound0.02-0.34 MText
Range
6 · Results and Discussion · Figures 8c and 8d
ZZU-2 formic acid linear response upper bound0.02-0.34 MText
Range
6 · Results and Discussion · Figures 8c and 8d
ZZU-2 response at 0.34 M formic acidapproximately 8.6 (R0/Ra)Visual Estimate
Approximate
6 · Results and Discussion · Figure 8d

selectivity and recycling response tests

ZZU-2 tablet impedance sensor · Pellet

Responses toward MeOH, n-hexane, benzene, toluene, formic acid, EtOH, acetone, acetic acid and butane at 25 deg C; recycling for formic acid response

Temperature
298
Atmosphere
VOC vapours and formic acid vapour
Geometry
tablet sandwiched between Pt sheets
Context
pristine framework
Measurement source
7 · Results and Discussion · Figure 9
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
ZZU-2 formic acid selectivity responseapproximately 8.6, much higher than other VOCsVisual Estimate
Approximate
7 · Results and Discussion · Figure 9b