Microscopy Morphology — Facile synthesis of Ni-, Co-, Cu-metal organic frameworks electrocatalyst boosting for hydrogen evolution reaction

3 measurement groups · 7 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

As-prepared Co-BTC crystals/powder · Powder

SEM/TEM images used to determine Co-BTC rod morphology and rod width.

Context: pristine powder
Measurement source: main p.3, article p.174 · Results and discussion · Fig. 2c,d

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
Co-BTC morphology	slender rod shape	—	—	Text Qualitative	main p.3, article p.174 · Results and discussion · Fig. 2c
Co-BTC rod width	~150 nm	—	~	Text Approximate	main p.4, article p.175 · Results and discussion · Fig. 2d

As-prepared Cu-BTC blue crystals/powder · Powder

SEM/TEM images used to determine Cu-BTC rhombic octahedral morphology and nanoscale particle size.

Context: pristine powder
Measurement source: main p.3, article p.174 · Results and discussion · Fig. 2a,b

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
Cu-BTC morphology	three-dimensional rhombic octahedral-like morphology	—	—	Text Qualitative	main p.3, article p.174 · Results and discussion · Fig. 2a
Cu-BTC octahedron side length	~20 um	—	~	Text Approximate	main p.3, article p.174 · Results and discussion · Fig. 2a
Cu-BTC TEM particle size range	100 nm to 300 nm	—	range	Text Range	main p.3, article p.174 · Results and discussion · Fig. 2b

As-prepared Ni-BTC precipitate/powder · Powder

SEM/TEM images used to determine Ni-BTC spherical morphology and size.

Context: pristine powder
Measurement source: main p.3, article p.174 · Results and discussion · Fig. 2e,f

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
Ni-BTC morphology	delicate sphere	—	—	Text Qualitative	main p.4, article p.175 · Results and discussion · Fig. 2e
Ni-BTC sphere size range	2.5-4.0 um	—	range	Text Range	main p.4, article p.175 · Results and discussion · Fig. 2e