Other — Advanced dual-signal point-of-care testing platform for sensitive T-2 toxin detection: Integrating copper-based conductive MOF with target-responsive DNA hydrogel

Measurement evidence

Other

Advanced dual-signal point-of-care testing platform for sensitive T-2 toxin detection: Integrating copper-based conductive MOF with target-responsive DNA hydrogel · Lin J., Deng Y., Lin Y. et al. · Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical · 2025 · 137802

1 measurement group · 12 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

Photothermal heating under 808 nm laser irradiation

Cu3(HHTP)2 solution/dispersion for photothermal and catalytic tests · Unknown

Concentration-dependent heating curves; Fig. 2 caption reports 808 nm, 3 W cm^-2

Atmosphere: ambient solution test
Context: pristine Cu3(HHTP)2 control
Measurement source: 4 · 3.1. Materials characterization · Fig. 2A-C

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
Approximate 10 min photothermal temperature, 100 ug/mL Cu3(HHTP)2Marked as a best value within this paper	about 87 C at 10 min	—	—	Figure Axis Approximate	4 · 3.1. Materials characterization · Fig. 2A
Approximate 10 min photothermal temperature, 20 ug/mL Cu3(HHTP)2	about 57 C at 10 min	—	—	Figure Axis Approximate	4 · 3.1. Materials characterization · Fig. 2A
Approximate 10 min photothermal temperature, 40 ug/mL Cu3(HHTP)2	about 62 C at 10 min	—	—	Figure Axis Approximate	4 · 3.1. Materials characterization · Fig. 2A
Maximum temperature for 60 ug/mL Cu3(HHTP)2	75.5 C	—	—	Text Exact Reported	Specific formula for calculating the photothermal conversion efficiency · Figure 2C
Approximate 10 min photothermal temperature, 80 ug/mL Cu3(HHTP)2	about 82 C at 10 min	—	—	Figure Axis Approximate	4 · 3.1. Materials characterization · Fig. 2A
Photothermal cycling stability	minimal fluctuation over four laser on/off cycles	—	—	Text Qualitative	3 · 3.1. Materials characterization · Fig. 2B
Photothermal conversion efficiency	58.9 %	—	—	Text Rounded Reported	3 · 3.1. Materials characterization · Fig. 2C
Photothermal conversion efficiencyMarked as a best value within this paper	58.93%	—	—	Text Exact Reported	Specific formula for calculating the photothermal conversion efficiency
Heat-transfer parameter hS	0.0255 J/K	—	—	Text Exact Reported	Specific formula for calculating the photothermal conversion efficiency · Figure 2C
Heat-transfer parameter hSbuff for water	0.0162 J/K	—	—	Text Exact Reported	Specific formula for calculating the photothermal conversion efficiency
Characteristic rate constant, Cu3(HHTP)2 solution	tau = 328	—	—	Text Exact Reported	Specific formula for calculating the photothermal conversion efficiency · Figure 2C
Approximate 10 min photothermal temperature, water control	about 34 C at 10 min	—	—	Figure Axis Approximate	4 · 3.1. Materials characterization · Fig. 2A