Xiangling Deng, Sai-Li Zheng, Yuan-Hui Zhong, Jieying Hu, Lai-Hon Chung, Jun He · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · 2022
To review sulfur-functionalized ligands and thiol-MOFs, from thiol-linker design and synthesis through MOF growth strategies and applications, with emphasis on conductive or semiconductive metal-sulfur frameworks.
The review’s argument is preserved as a navigable set of section summaries.
Surveys conductivity, electrocatalysis, adsorption/separation and miscellaneous device uses, including secondary benchmarks for conductive and catalytic metal-sulfur frameworks.
Relevance: Core · 24 · 4. Applications of Thiol-MOFs
Frames low MOF conductivity as a historical limitation and defines thiol-functionalized linkers as a route to conductive MOFs while identifying synthesis, crystallinity and stability barriers.
Relevance: Core · 3 · 1. Introduction (Challenges and Opportunities)
Classifies thiol aromatic ligands into direct dithiolene, masked/protected forms and multifunctional thiol-carboxyl linkers; Table 1 links representative ligands to MOFs.
Relevance: Core · 4 · 2. Synthetic strategies for thiol ligands · Table 1
Organises thiol-MOF assembly by hard/soft coordination matching, interfacial routes, solvothermal masked or modulated synthesis, and post-synthetic modification.
Relevance: Core · 13 · 3. Synthetic strategy of thiol-MOFs
Summarises progress and open issues: difficult crystallisation, need for structural determination, stability/performance concerns and opportunities for perthiolated carboxylate linkers.
Relevance: Core · 31 · 5. Concluding remarks and perspectives
Classification systems are attributed to this review and are not treated as a global material registry.
Section 4 divides uses into conductive behaviour, electrocatalysis, gas adsorption/separation and miscellaneous device/catalyst roles.
Categories: conductivity · hydrogen evolution · ORR/OER · CO2 reduction · nitrogen reduction · adsorption and separation · perovskite solar cells and photocatalysis
24 · 4. Applications of Thiol-MOFs
The review repeatedly frames the field around these three barriers, explaining why thiol-MOF examples remain fewer than amine/hydroxyl analogues.
Categories: demanding linker synthesis and storage · poor MOF crystallinity · difficult characterisation of unstable MOFs
3 · 1. Introduction (Challenges and Opportunities)
The review uses HSAB reasoning to rationalise which metals bind thiolate versus carboxylate and why carboxyl-thiol linkers can enable diverse coordination modes.
Categories: soft metal ions with thiolates/dithiolene donors · hard metal ions with carboxylates · borderline metals allowing carboxyl/thiol co-coordination
13 · 3. Synthetic strategy of thiol-MOFs
Section 2 uses this three-part organisation to relate direct ligands, protected latent thiols and multifunctional linkers to MOF construction.
Categories: thiol aromatic ligand · masked form of thiol aromatic ligand · thiol multifunctional aromatic ligand
4 · 2. Synthetic strategies for thiol ligands
The review distinguishes interfacial confinement routes for films/nanosheets from solvothermal, masked, modulated and post-synthetic approaches for crystallinity and functionalisation.
Categories: liquid/liquid interfacial synthesis · gas/liquid interfacial synthesis · Langmuir-Blodgett assembly · solvothermal synthesis · masked synthesis · modulated synthesis · post-synthetic method
16 · 3.1. Interfacial synthesis
The review separates thiol-MOFs into pi-conjugated/redox-active dithiolene frameworks and robust carboxyl-thiol frameworks where thiols can remain free-standing or coordinate.
Categories: soft-metal dithiolene frameworks · hard-metal carboxyl-thiol frameworks
1 · Abstract
Review-defined families retain their representative materials and conduction descriptions.
Planar metal-sulfur frameworks based on benzenehexathiol/benzenehexathiolate motifs, often forming honeycomb or dense 2D networks.
Conduction: High pi/d conjugation and metal-sulfur covalency support delocalised charge transport; review highlights very high conductivities for Cu and Ag examples.
Representative materials: Cu-BHT/HBT-Cu · [Ag5(C6S6)]n · Ag3BHT2 · CoBHT · NiBHT
Nodes / linkers: Cu · Ag · Co · Ni · Fe · Pd · Pt · BHT · benzenehexathiolate · dithiolene
5 · Table 1 · Table 1
Carboxyl-sulfur linkers whose thiol groups coordinate softer or lower-valent metals, producing metal-sulfur chains or mixed O/S coordination.
Conduction: Review links metal-sulfur chain formation and redox-active ligands to improved charge transfer and semiconducting behaviour.
Representative materials: Fe(DSBDC)2 · Mn(DSBDC)2 · Eu-dfdmt · Cu6(DMBD)3(en)4(Hen)6 · Pb2(DMBD)(en)2
Nodes / linkers: Fe(II) · Mn(II) · Eu(II/III) · Cu(I/II) · Pb(II) · DSBDC/DMBD · dfdmt
15 · 3. Synthetic strategy of thiol-MOFs
2D conducting or semiconducting organic-inorganic chalcogenide materials prepared by organic modification then exfoliation, adjacent to conventional conductive MOFs.
Conduction: Review reports tunable semiconducting band gaps and conductivities up to 0.2 S cm-1.
Representative materials: M(XPh-Y) · Pb-benzenedithiol OMC
Nodes / linkers: Cu(I) · Ag(I) · Au(I) · Pb(II) · functionalized benzenethiolate/benzeneselenolate · 1,4-benzenedithiol
26 · 4.1. Conductivity
MOFs assembled from pdt, bdt, btdt or substituted benzenedithiolates, often through anionic metal-bis(dithiolene) complexes coupled to additional cations.
Conduction: Review treats Cu[Cu(pdt)2] as an early conductive MOF and M-BT as electrocatalytic dithiolene coordination polymers.
Representative materials: Cu[Cu(pdt)2] · NKMOF-1-Ni · Au(btdt)2 salts · FeBT · NiBT
Nodes / linkers: Cu · Ni · Au · Fe · Co · Zn · pdt · bdt · btdt · BT
14 · 3. Synthetic strategy of thiol-MOFs
Sulfur-rich coronene-derived dithiolene frameworks based on PTC/PSC chemistry.
Conduction: Review describes PTC-Fe as semiconducting and ferromagnetic, with reported room-temperature conductivity.
Representative materials: PTC-Fe · PSC · PTC
Nodes / linkers: Fe · PTC · perthiolated coronene
11 · 2.2. The masked form of thiol aromatic ligands
Frameworks using THT/HTT triphenylene hexathiol cores, including monolayer Ni-THT and gyroidal HTT-Pb formed from masked linkers.
Conduction: The triphenylene core supports pi-conjugation; review links THT-Co/THT-Fe to semiconductor-metal transitions and HTT-Pb to humidity-sensitive electronic current.
Representative materials: Ni-THT · CoTHT · FeTHT · HTT-Pb · HTT-Pt
Nodes / linkers: Ni · Co · Fe · Pb · Pt · THT · HTT · HBuTT · HVaTT
7 · 2.1. The thiol aromatic ligands · Table 1
Robust Zr-oxo frameworks constructed from carboxyl-thiol linkers, where hard Zr(IV) coordinates carboxylates while thiols often remain accessible in pores.
Conduction: Generally not framed as highest electronic conductors; thiol arrays enable post-synthetic metalation, Hg binding, proton-conducting sulfonate conversion and device interfaces.
Representative materials: Zr-DMBD · ZrDMTD · ZrOMTP · ZrTTA-6SH · ZrL3
Nodes / linkers: Zr(IV) · H4DMBD · H2DMTD · H4OMTP · H3TTA-6SH · H3L3
15 · 3. Synthetic strategy of thiol-MOFs
Review-level synthesis principles remain separate from primary-study recipes.
Design aromatic linkers bearing both carboxylate and thiol groups so hard metal nodes can build robust frameworks while thiols remain active or participate in coordination.
Claimed effects: Combines crystallinity from carboxylate MOF chemistry with sulfur functionality for transport, catalysis, adsorption or post-synthetic modification.
Controlling variables: ester protection · sulfur-source substitution · debenzylation/deprotection route · linker geometry
Representative materials: H4DMBD · H4OMTP · H2DMBPD · H4dfdmt
Caveat: Compatibility between thiol deprotection and ester/carboxyl functionality remains difficult.
11 · 2.3. The thiol multifunctional aromatic ligands
Prepare reactive aromatic polythiols/dithiolene linkers and coordinate them directly to soft metals to form metal-dithiolene frameworks.
Claimed effects: Direct routes access highly conjugated frameworks but suffer from sensitivity, odour and fast precipitation that reduce crystallinity.
Controlling variables: thiol oxidation sensitivity · inert atmosphere · halogen substitution pattern · metal softness and reduction potential
Representative materials: BHT · THT · PTC · Ni-BHT · Cu-BHT
Caveat: The review discourages recipe-level generalisation because each thiol ligand has divergent reactivity.
7 · 2.1. The thiol aromatic ligands
Assemble monolayer or multilayer 2D metal-dithiolene sheets at air/water or Langmuir-Blodgett interfaces.
Claimed effects: Enables monolayer or controllable multilayer films with molecular-level structure control.
Controlling variables: surface pressure · monomer distribution · metal-ion diffusion · layer transfer repetitions
Representative materials: BHT-Ni · Ni-THT · ATT-Co
Caveat: Large surface energy and monolayer handling remain practical challenges.
19 · 3.1.2. Gas/liquid interface synthesis
Use immiscible metal-salt and linker phases to confine assembly at a liquid interface, producing films, nanosheets or morphology-controlled products.
Claimed effects: Provides a 2D matrix that restricts growth and can yield crystalline stacked nanosheets or films.
Controlling variables: phase choice · precursor concentration · counterions · molecular orientation at interface
Representative materials: BT-Ni · Cu-BHT · Ag-BHT · PtDT
Caveat: Film quality can collapse when concentration is too high, while low concentration can make films invisible.
16 · 3.1.1. Liquid/liquid interfacial synthesis
Block thiol groups as thioethers, thioesters, tin complexes or other protected forms, then reveal thiolates during MOF assembly.
Claimed effects: Reduces ligand reactivity, improves storage/manipulation and can slow MOF growth enough to improve crystallinity.
Controlling variables: protecting group stability · in-situ deprotection rate · base or Lewis acid conditions · metal redox compatibility
Representative materials: HBuTT · HVaTT · SnBHT · HTT-Pb · PtDT
Caveat: Deprotection chemistry must be compatible with other functional groups and redox-sensitive metals.
7 · 2. Synthetic strategies for thiol ligands
Use acidic or other modulators to slow nucleation/crystal growth in Zr and other carboxylate/thiol MOFs.
Claimed effects: Can improve crystallinity and yield larger or single-crystal thiol-functional frameworks.
Controlling variables: modulator identity · modulator amount · metal centre hardness · deprotonation rate
Representative materials: Zr-DMBD · Zr-DMBPD · Zr-DMTD
Caveat: Regulator choice depends strongly on metal centre; acidic modulators are not universal.
22 · 3.2.2. Modulated synthesis
Adjust method and reaction conditions to produce films, microcrystals or nanoparticles from similar metal-sulfur precursor sets.
Claimed effects: Morphology affects application performance, especially electrocatalysis where exposed active edges and mass transport matter.
Controlling variables: synthetic route · addition rate · stirring · substrate/interface · precursor concentration
Representative materials: Cu-BHT film · Cu-BHT microcrystals · Cu-BHT nanoparticles
Caveat: High conductivity alone does not guarantee catalytic performance when surface area or porosity is limited.
17 · 3.1.1. Liquid/liquid interfacial synthesis
Modify robust MOFs after synthesis by linker exchange, thiol metalation, iodination, oxidation to sulfonates or installation of catalytic sites.
Claimed effects: Provides access to functional thiol-MOFs that may not survive direct synthesis, while retaining topology and porosity.
Controlling variables: framework stability · exchange temperature · thiol spacing · metal-thiol bond strength
Representative materials: UiO-66-TCAT · Zr-DMTD-Pd · Zr-DMBD-Co · Zr-DMBD-SO3H
Caveat: Requires stable parent frameworks and careful suppression of thiol side reactions such as poisoning or disproportionation.
23 · 3.2.3. Post-synthetic method
Use protected dithiolene ligands under solvothermal conditions to slow thiolate formation and allow structural ordering.
Claimed effects: Review identifies this as the route to single-crystalline HTT-Pb, improving crystallinity relative to direct thiol ligation.
Controlling variables: masked ligand rigidity · alkaline deprotection · metal-node fit · growth rate
Representative materials: HTT-Pb
Caveat: HTT-Pb is presented as exceptional rather than broadly general.
21 · 3.2.1. Masked synthesis
These are the review authors’ synthesis, not newly measured results.
Coordinatively unsaturated metal-bis(dithiolene) planes are presented as gas-sensing/adsorption sites whose electronic response can be modulated by CO, NO or O2 adsorption.
Evidence basis: multi_reference
Caveat: Much of this section is based on first-principles calculation rather than device measurements.
29 · 4.3. Adsorption and separation
For metastable metal-dithiolene frameworks, intrinsic transport measurements should be performed in vacuum or inert atmosphere because air exposure can oxidise metal centres and ligands.
Evidence basis: multi_reference
Caveat: The review gives examples but not a universal protocol for every framework.
4 · 1. Introduction (Challenges and Opportunities)
The review interprets conductivity in 2D metal-dithiolene frameworks as sensitive to oxidation state and doping, with reduction or oxidation changing conductivity by orders of magnitude.
Evidence basis: multi_reference
Caveat: Different materials and dopants should not be directly compared without primary-method details.
25 · 4.1. Conductivity
Dithiolene linkers confer rigidity, pi-conjugation and redox activity, which can modulate electronic properties in metal-dithiolene MOFs.
Evidence basis: multi_reference
Caveat: Structural disorder and film morphology can dominate macroscopic transport.
7 · 2.1. The thiol aromatic ligands
Applications of metal-sulfur MOFs are still at an initial stage, with several areas relying heavily on theoretical studies.
Evidence basis: review_reasoning
Caveat: The field has likely advanced after the review's 2021 literature window, but no network update was permitted.
32 · 5. Concluding remarks and perspectives
Interfacial synthesis confines growth in two dimensions and is presented as a key route to crystalline large-area 2D metal-sulfur films or monolayers.
Evidence basis: multi_reference
Caveat: Surface energy, interface composition and concentration strongly affect film quality.
16 · 3.1. Interfacial synthesis
MOFs historically lagged in electrochemical and electronic-device uses because many frameworks lacked adequate electrical conductivity.
Evidence basis: multi_reference
Caveat: The review states this broadly; primary support should come from cited conductive-MOF literature.
3 · 1. Introduction (Challenges and Opportunities)
Masked thiol ligands can reduce thiol reactivity and enable higher-crystallinity MOFs, including single-crystal HTT-Pb.
Evidence basis: single_reference
Caveat: The review presents HTT-Pb as a notable success rather than a universal outcome.
7 · 2. Synthetic strategies for thiol ligands
For M-BHT and M-BT electrocatalysis, the review emphasises metal identity as a determinant of HER activity and active-site electronic structure.
Evidence basis: multi_reference
Caveat: The review mixes experimental and theoretical evidence; primary comparisons should be normalised before quantitative use.
28 · 4.2.1. Hydrogen evolution reaction (HER)
The review treats organic metal chalcogenides as an adjacent 2D conductive material class that broadens design space for tunable band gaps and conductivity.
Evidence basis: multi_reference
Caveat: OMCs are adjacent to, rather than identical with, conventional porous MOFs.
26 · 4.1. Conductivity
High conductivity alone is insufficient for HER: porosity and exposed active sites affect substrate/product transfer, explaining why Cu-BHT nanoparticles can outperform dense films catalytically.
Evidence basis: single_reference
Caveat: Catalytic rankings depend on morphology and electrochemical test conditions.
28 · 4.2.1. Hydrogen evolution reaction (HER)
Post-synthetic modification of thiol-functional MOFs can convert accessible thiols into catalytic, adsorption or proton-conducting functions while retaining robust frameworks.
Evidence basis: multi_reference
Caveat: Requires stable parent frameworks, usually UiO/Zr-type, and careful control of thiol reactivity.
24 · 3.2.3. Post-synthetic method
For many dithiolate MOFs, structure-performance relationships are hindered because single-crystal structures are difficult and structure determination often relies on simulation.
Evidence basis: review_reasoning
Caveat: The caveat does not apply equally to carboxyl-thiol frameworks with single-crystal structures.
31 · 5. Concluding remarks and perspectives
Thiol and metal-sulfur motifs are interpreted as promoting orbital overlap and charge delocalisation through covalent, polarizable metal-sulfur links.
Evidence basis: multi_reference
Caveat: Mechanistic strength depends on the specific framework and measurement conditions.
3 · 1. Introduction (Challenges and Opportunities)
THT-Co and THT-Fe are presented as examples where temperature-dependent semiconductor-to-metal transitions relate to doping, film thickness and charge delocalisation.
Evidence basis: multi_reference
Caveat: The review reports interpretation at a high level; detailed transport mechanism requires the primary studies.
25 · 4.1. Conductivity
Carboxyl-thiol bifunctional linkers balance crystallinity, stability and sulfur functionality because carboxylates build robust hard-metal frameworks while thiols remain accessible or coordinate selectively.
Evidence basis: multi_reference
Caveat: Electronic transport is not necessarily high unless sulfur participates in charge-transfer pathways.
31 · 5. Concluding remarks and perspectives
The review's core organising split is between soft-metal dithiolene frameworks and hard-metal carboxyl-thiol frameworks.
Evidence basis: review_reasoning
Caveat: This is a secondary taxonomy, not a strict chemical boundary for every sulfur-containing MOF.
1 · Abstract
Every row remains visibly secondary and links to a primary dossier only where the mapping is verified.
| Material | Property | Reported value | Context and quality | Primary evidence | Review source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SecondaryAg3BHT2 thin film | electrical conductivity | up to 363 S cm^-1 | thin film Text · Exact Reported | research_0096 | 25 · 4.1. Conductivity |
| Secondarypolycrystalline [Ag5(C6S6)]n film | electrical conductivity | 250 S cm^-1 | polycrystalline film Text · Exact Reported | research_0735 | 25 · 4.1. Conductivity |
| SecondaryBHT-Ni monolayer nanosheets | AFM thickness | ~0.6 nm | AFM measurements after gas/liquid interfacial synthesis Text · Approximate | No verified corpus mapping | 20 · 3.1.2. Gas/liquid interface synthesis |
| SecondaryCo-BHT film | HER overpotential | 0.34 V at 10 mA cm^-2, pH 1.3 | current density 10 mA cm-2; pH 1.3 Text · Exact Reported | No verified corpus mapping | 28 · 4.2.1. Hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) |
| SecondaryCo-THT film | HER overpotential | 0.53 V at 10 mA cm^-2, pH 1.3 | current density 10 mA cm-2; pH 1.3 Text · Exact Reported | No verified corpus mapping | 28 · 4.2.1. Hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) |
| Secondary{[Cu2(6-Hmna)(6-mn)]·NH4}n | electrical conductivity | 10.96 S cm^-1 | single-crystal MOF with (-M-S-)n chains Text · Exact Reported | research_0104 | 25 · 4.1. Conductivity |
| SecondaryCu[Cu(pdt)2] | electrical conductivity | 6 x 10^-4 S cm^-1 | microporous pdt2- Cu MOF Text · Exact Reported | research_0201 | 25 · 4.1. Conductivity |
| SecondaryEu-dfdmt | electrical conductivity | 10^-6 S m^-1 | review text; extensive Eu2+-S bridges Text · Exact Reported | No verified corpus mapping | 25 · 4.1. Conductivity |
| SecondaryHBT-Cu / Cu-BHT | electrical conductivity | 1580 S cm^-1 | Figure 23a; review says highest MOF conductivity to date Text · Exact Reported | research_0006 | 25 · 4.1. Conductivity |
| SecondaryHBT-Ni / Ni-BHT oxidized | electrical conductivity | 1.6 x 10^2 S cm^-1 | after oxidation by tris(4-bromophenyl)aminiumhexachloro-antimonate Text · Exact Reported | research_0361 | 25 · 4.1. Conductivity |
| SecondaryHBT-Ni / Ni-BHT reduced by NaTCNQ | electrical conductivity | 6.7 x 10^-3 S cm^-1 | after reduction by NaTCNQ Text · Exact Reported | No verified corpus mapping | 25 · 4.1. Conductivity |
| SecondaryHBT-Ni / Ni-BHT | electrical conductivity | 0.15 S cm^-1 at 298 K | 298 K Text · Exact Reported | No verified corpus mapping | 25 · 4.1. Conductivity |
| SecondaryNi-dithiolene coordination polymer / NiBT | HER overpotential | 470 mV at pH 1.3 and 10 mA cm^-2 | pH 1.3; current density 10 mA cm-2 Text · Exact Reported | No verified corpus mapping | 28 · 4.2.1. Hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) |
| SecondaryNi-THT monolayer film | monolayer thickness | ~0.7 nm | LB method; Fig. 19c AFM height image Text · Approximate | No verified corpus mapping | 21 · 3.1.2. Gas/liquid interface synthesis |
| SecondaryM(XPh-Y) organic metal chalcogenides | band gap range | 2.51-3.34 eV | 2D OMC family with varied metal/chalcogen/substituent Text · Range | No verified corpus mapping | 26 · 4.1. Conductivity |
| SecondaryM(XPh-Y) organic metal chalcogenides | maximum conductivity | as highest as 0.2 S cm^-1 | 2D OMC family reported by Xu and co-workers Text · Exact Reported | No verified corpus mapping | 26 · 4.1. Conductivity |
| SecondaryPb2+ 1,4-benzenedithiol OMC derivative | band gap | 1.54 eV | semiconducting Pb2+ derivative used for NO2 chemiresistive sensing Text · Exact Reported | No verified corpus mapping | 26 · 4.1. Conductivity |
| SecondaryPTC-Fe | electrical conductivity | 10 S cm^-1 at 300 K | 300 K; four-point-probe van der Pauw measurements per review Text · Exact Reported | research_0045 | 25 · 4.1. Conductivity |
| SecondaryPtDT after I2 oxidation | electrical conductivity | 0.39 S cm^-1 after a 10^6-fold leap | after oxidation by I2 Text · Exact Reported | No verified corpus mapping | 25 · 4.1. Conductivity |
| SecondaryZrDMBD | Hg(II) concentration after removal | less than 0.01 ppm after removal | water; selective Hg(II) removal by free-standing -SH groups Text · Approximate | No verified corpus mapping | 30 · 4.4. Miscellaneous |
| SecondaryZr-DMBD-SO3H | proton conductivity | 0.084 S cm^-1 at 80 C and 90% RH | 80 C; 90% relative humidity; after H2O2 oxidation of thiol to sulfonate Text · Exact Reported | No verified corpus mapping | 24 · 3.2.3. Post-synthetic method |
Open questions are presented as review-author priorities, not conclusions from the primary database.
The field needs better control over crystallinity, topology and particle size during metal-sulfur framework growth.
Proposed direction: Tune reactant properties, concentration/proportioning, temperature, pH, solvents, modulators and interfacial conditions.
31 · 5. Concluding remarks and perspectives
The authors anticipate perthiolated carboxylate bifunctional linkers as an underdeveloped route to stable, processable, multifunctional thiol-MOFs.
Proposed direction: Explore perthiolated carboxylate linkers that combine abundant thiol side groups with robust carboxylate coordination.
31 · 5. Concluding remarks and perspectives · Fig. 31
Stability and performance are presented as critical concerns for follow-up applications in conduction, catalysis and sensing.
Proposed direction: Design more stable sulfur-functionalized linkers and frameworks suitable for processing, fabrication and long-term operation.
31 · 5. Concluding remarks and perspectives
Lack of absolute structural determination for many dithiolate MOFs hinders evaluation of structure-performance relationships.
Proposed direction: Prioritise single-crystal, high-resolution or otherwise auditable structures before performance optimisation.
31 · 5. Concluding remarks and perspectives
Some application areas, including lithium-sulfur batteries, NRR catalysis and gas separation, remain at an initial or theoretical-study stage.
Proposed direction: Translate theoretical predictions into experimentally characterised conductive metal-sulfur MOFs.
32 · 5. Concluding remarks and perspectives
Air/light sensitivity, foul odour and divergent thiol reactivity make ligand synthesis, storage and manipulation difficult.
Proposed direction: Develop tailored, milder and more general linker synthesis/protection protocols.
31 · 5. Concluding remarks and perspectives
Mappings show which printed review references have a verified counterpart in the frozen primary corpus.
| Reference | Study | Role and context | Corpus mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ref. 222017 | Title unavailable | transport_benchmarkReview cites this work for temperature-dependent charge transport and semiconductor-to-metal behaviour in THT-Co. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 262018 | Title unavailable | transport_benchmarkReview cites this Langmuir study for Ag3BHT2 thin-film conductivity and Ag-BHT structure comparison. | research_0096 |
| Ref. 342009 | Title unavailable | transport_benchmarkReview cites this 2009 conductive porous pyrazine-dithiol MOF as an early conductive 2D MOF benchmark. | research_0201 |
| Ref. 382013 | Title unavailable | material_familyReview cites Dinca and co-workers for carboxyl-sulfur linker MOFs containing metal-sulfur chains. | research_0011 |
| Ref. 462013 | Title unavailable | transport_benchmarkReview cites Nishihara and co-workers for monolayer Ni-BHT and its conductivity/oxidation-state dependence. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 492018 | Title unavailable | transport_benchmarkReview cites PTC-Fe as a semiconducting and ferromagnetic 2D MOF with reported conductivity at 300 K. | research_0045 |
| Ref. 502019 | Title unavailable | synthesis_strategyReview cites SnBHT-enabled PtDT nanosheets and oxidation-linked conductivity change. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 652017 | Title unavailable | synthesis_strategyReview cites HTT-Pb as a masked-linker route to a single-crystal metal-dithiolene framework. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 752013 | Title unavailable | material_familyReview cites Zr-DMBD as a carboxyl-thiol framework with accessible thiol groups and Hg removal context. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 762015 | Title unavailable | material_familyReview cites ZrDMTD for thiol-carboxylate Zr-MOF structure and post-synthetic Pd catalysis. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 772018 | Title unavailable | synthesis_strategyReview cites H4OMTP/ZrOMTP as an example of designed carboxyl-thiol linker synthesis and topology. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 782019 | Title unavailable | material_familyReview cites Zr-DMBPD/UiO-67-(SH)2 as an isomorphic carboxyl-thiol Zr-MOF example. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 802020 | Title unavailable | application_relevanceReview cites ZrTTA-6SH for post-synthetic metalloporphyrin functionalisation and photocatalytic hydrogen production. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 822009 | Title unavailable | material_familyReview cites DMBD frameworks to illustrate multiple coordination modes of carboxyl-thiol linkers. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 832020 | Title unavailable | transport_benchmarkReview cites Eu-dfdmt as a black semiconducting framework with Eu-S bridges and modest conductivity. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 842015 | Title unavailable | material_familyReview cites Fe(DSBDC)2 as a MOF-74 analogue with metal-sulfur chains and charge-transport relevance. | research_0063 |
| Ref. 882017 | Title unavailable | synthesis_strategyReview cites Cu-BHT films, microcrystals and nanoparticles, including morphology effects for catalysis. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 892019 | Title unavailable | transport_benchmarkReview cites THT-Fe air oxidation and semiconductor-to-metal transport behaviour. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 922014 | Title unavailable | transport_benchmarkReview cites oxidised Ni-BHT/HBT-Ni for enhanced conductivity and van der Pauw measurement context. | research_0361 |
| Ref. 932018 | Title unavailable | transport_benchmarkReview cites Ag-BHT films for high conductivity and liquid-liquid interfacial synthesis. | research_0735 |
| Ref. 952015 | Title unavailable | electrocatalysisReview cites Co-BHT/Co-THT films and HER overpotential benchmarks. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 982015 | Title unavailable | transport_benchmarkReview cites HBT-Cu/Cu-BHT as the highest conductivity MOF benchmark in the review. | research_0006 |
| Ref. 1052015 | Title unavailable | synthesis_strategyReview cites large monolayer Ni-THT films prepared by Langmuir-Blodgett method. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 1102018 | Title unavailable | electrocatalysisReview cites M-BHT HER activity order and film-thickness dependence. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 1132017 | Title unavailable | electrocatalysisReview cites Co dithiolene-diamine complexes for HER rationale and stability comparison. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 1172018 | Title unavailable | adsorption_separationReview cites Cu[Ni(pdt)2] for strong C2H2 binding and selectivity context. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 1302016 | Title unavailable | electrocatalysisReview cites M-BT electrocatalytic activity and Ni-dithiolene HER overpotential. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 1322014 | Title unavailable | synthesis_strategyReview cites liquid-liquid interfacial synthesis of BT-Ni nanosheets. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 1422020 | Title unavailable | device_contextReview cites thiol-carboxyl ZrL3 for perovskite solar-cell interlayer/device context. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 1692018 | Title unavailable | application_relevanceReview cites thiol-functional Zr-DMBD for mercury removal and proton-exchange capture mechanism. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 1702015 | Title unavailable | post_synthetic_modificationReview cites post-synthetic exchange and metalation of thiol-functional Zr-MOFs. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 1902015 | Title unavailable | application_relevanceReview cites Zr-DMBD Hg anchoring and oxidised sulfonate/proton-conducting derivative. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 2132019 | Title unavailable | transport_benchmarkReview cites an infinite metal-sulfur chain MOF with high single-crystal conductivity. | research_0104 |
| Ref. 2172010 | Title unavailable | proton_transportReview cites the oxidised thiol-to-sulfonate material for proton conductivity after H2O2 oxidation. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 2322020 | Title unavailable | transport_benchmarkReview cites organic metal chalcogenides made by modification-then-exfoliation as tunable semiconducting 2D OMCs. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 2362021 | 10.1002/anie.20210718510.1002/anie.202107185 | sensor_contextReview cites a Pb2+ OMC derivative with 1.54 eV band gap and NO2 sensing. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 2602020 | Title unavailable | theory_contextReview cites MC4S4 volcano analysis for theoretical NRR activity context. | Unmapped |