Authors unavailable · Sustainable Materials and Technologies · 2021
To review the chemical structures, electronic/conductive mechanisms, synthesis routes, electrochemical energy-storage applications, in-situ characterisation needs and future challenges of two-dimensional conductive metal-organic frameworks.
The review’s argument is preserved as a navigable set of section summaries.
Classifies ligand families, metal nodes and coordination motifs, and links metal/linker choices to stacking modes and microstructure.
Relevance: Core · p001 · 2. Chemical structure of 2D c-MOFs · Fig. 1; Fig. 2
Synthesises the review's design logic and open challenges: more ligands, better crystallinity, fewer defects, composite design, stability, mechanism studies and lower-cost scalable synthesis.
Relevance: Core · p007 · Conclusions and perspectives
Explains conductivity through carrier density/mobility, band structure, redox charge injection and four transport pathways.
Relevance: Core · p002 · 3.1 Conductive mechanisms of 2D c-MOFs · Fig. 3
Summarises Ohm-law conductivity calculation, four measurement geometries, contact-resistance caveats, morphology effects and Table 1 literature benchmarks.
Relevance: Core · p002 · 3.2 Conductivity measurements · Fig. 4; Table 1
Reviews uses as anodes, cathodes and separators, with emphasis on redox-active ligands/metal nodes, ion transport and battery stability.
Relevance: Supporting · p005 · 5. The Application of 2D c-MOFs · Fig. 13-Fig. 18
Argues that in-situ XRD, ND, FTIR, Raman, XPS, XAS, TEM and AFM are needed to resolve structural and electronic changes during cycling.
Relevance: Supporting · p006 · 6. Advanced in-situ characterization methods · Fig. 19
Frames batteries and other energy technologies as the application context, contrasts graphene, MoS2, MXene and conventional MOFs with 2D c-MOFs, and states the review's structure.
Relevance: Core · p001 · Introduction
Organises synthesis into hydrothermal/solvothermal, interface-assisted and electrochemical routes and relates each route to morphology, crystallinity, film quality and scalability.
Relevance: Core · p003 · 4. Synthesis of 2D c-MOFs · Fig. 5; Fig. 12
Classification systems are attributed to this review and are not treated as a global material registry.
The application section organises secondary-battery use by component role, separating electrode storage from separator-mediated polysulfide control.
Categories: anode material · cathode material · separator modifier · pure separator/interlayer
p005 · 5. The Application of 2D c-MOFs · Fig. 13-Fig. 18
The authors distinguish amine, hydroxy and thiol coordination motifs as familiar functional-group/metal combinations reported for battery-relevant 2D c-MOFs.
Categories: MH4 · MO4 · MS4
p001 · 2. Chemical structure of 2D c-MOFs
The review groups common 2D c-MOF ligands by aromatic core and coordinating groups such as NH2, OH, SH and SeH.
Categories: benzene HXB · triphenylene HXTP · phthalocyanine PcM-X8/NPcM-(OH)8 · other extended linkers
p001 · 2. Chemical structure of 2D c-MOFs · Fig. 1
The review distinguishes methods by contact resistance sensitivity and suitability for regular samples, thin samples or irregular morphologies.
Categories: two-contact · four-contact · four-probe · van der Pauw
p002 · 3.2 Conductivity measurements · Fig. 4
Stacking is presented as a structure-control dimension affected by organic ligand and transition-metal node choices.
Categories: AAAA overlapping · AAAA dislocation · AAAA slippage · ABAB · staggered AAAA
p002 · 2. Chemical structure of 2D c-MOFs · Fig. 2
Interface-assisted strategies are separated by the phase boundary used to make films or nanosheets rather than bulk agglomerates.
Categories: liquid-liquid · liquid-gas · liquid-solid · solid-solid
p003 · 4.2 Interface-assisted methods · Fig. 7-Fig. 10
The review uses a four-pathway classification to organise how carriers move through redox sites, metal-ligand bonds, delocalised 2D planes and interlayer/non-covalent interactions.
Categories: hopping · through-bond · extended conjugation · through-space
p002 · 3.1 Conductive mechanisms of 2D c-MOFs · Fig. 3
Review-defined families retain their representative materials and conduction descriptions.
Benzene-based sulfur-coordinated 2D c-MOFs and nanosheets using BHT/HTB linkers.
Conduction: Redox state, crystallinity and film formation are highlighted as major determinants of high conductivity.
Representative materials: Ni3(BHT)2 · Cu3(BHT)2 · Cu-BHT · Cu3(HTB)2
Nodes / linkers: Ni · Cu · BHT · HTB
p003 · 4.2 Interface-assisted methods · Fig. 7; Table 1
HHB-derived copper frameworks, including Cu3(HHB)2 nanosheets and related THQ-derived products.
Conduction: The review emphasises redox-active HHB/Cu units and nanosheet morphology as enabling faster ion transport and higher capacity.
Representative materials: Cu3(HHB)2 · Cu-HHB NSs · Cu3(THQ)2
Nodes / linkers: Cu · HHB · THQ
p005 · 5.2 2D c-MOFs as cathode material · Fig. 16
2D metal-catecholate frameworks built from HHTP and metal nodes such as Cu, Ni and Co.
Conduction: Conductivity is linked to in-plane conjugation, metal-ligand orbital overlap and sample morphology; values span orders of magnitude in Table 1.
Representative materials: Cu3(HHTP)2 · Ni3(HHTP)2 · Co3(HHTP)2 · Cu3(HHTP)(THQ)
Nodes / linkers: Cu · Ni · Co · HHTP · THQ
p001 · 2. Chemical structure of 2D c-MOFs · Fig. 2; Table 1
Benzene imine frameworks based on HAB/HIB ligands with transition metals.
Conduction: Metallic behaviour and high conductivity are attributed to conjugated metal-ligand networks, while redox-active HAB sites support sodium storage.
Representative materials: Cu3(HIB)2 · Ni3(HIB)2 · Co3(HIB)2 · Co-HAB
Nodes / linkers: Cu · Ni · Co · HAB · HIB
p003 · 4.1 Hydrothermal and solvothermal methods · Table 1; Fig. 14
Triphenylene imine 2D c-MOFs formed from HITP and transition-metal nodes.
Conduction: The review contrasts Ni and Cu electronic structure and reports conductivity variation with metal substitution and morphology.
Representative materials: Ni3(HITP)2 · Cu3(HITP)2 · Co3(HITP)2 · Ni3(HITP)2/PP
Nodes / linkers: Ni · Cu · Co · HITP
p002 · 2. Chemical structure of 2D c-MOFs · Fig. 2C; Table 1
Layered frameworks based on metallophthalocyanine or naphthalocyanine ligands bearing hydroxy or amino groups.
Conduction: Included mainly as a ligand family and conductivity table class, with values reported by four-probe or van der Pauw methods.
Representative materials: Cu2[NiPcO8] · Ni2[NiPcO8] · Cu2[NiNPcO8] · Ni2[NiPc(NH)8]
Nodes / linkers: Cu · Ni · Fe · PcM-(OH)8 · PcM-(NH2)8 · NPcM-(OH)8
p001 · 2. Chemical structure of 2D c-MOFs · Fig. 1C; Table 1
Extended coronene linkers coordinated to Fe, Co or Ni to form highly conjugated 2D c-MOFs.
Conduction: The review reports substantial room-temperature conductivities and identifies the family as high-conjugation 2D c-MOFs.
Representative materials: Fe-PTC · Co-PTC · Ni-PTC
Nodes / linkers: Fe · Co · Ni · PTC
p003 · 4.1 Hydrothermal and solvothermal methods · Table 1
Review-level synthesis principles remain separate from primary-study recipes.
Electric-field-driven dissolution, anion migration and surface growth form Cu3(HHTP)2 films on copper foil, with transfer possible via PMMA.
Claimed effects: Produces high-quality, large-size porous films, directly on collectors, reducing poor active-material/current-collector contact.
Controlling variables: applied voltage · HHTP anion concentration · anode/cathode role · Cu2+ release · electrostatic attraction or repulsion
Representative materials: Cu3(HHTP)2 thin films
Caveat: Yield is still insufficient at industrial level; higher-performance nodes/linkers and productivity improvements are needed.
p004 · 4.3 Electrochemical synthetic method · Fig. 11
Bulk 2D c-MOF particles are produced by reacting metal salts and organic ligands in solution under controlled temperature/solvent conditions.
Claimed effects: Simple, scalable and high-yield but tends to produce agglomerated particles with grain boundaries and less accessible porosity.
Controlling variables: metal salt · organic ligand · solvent · temperature · reaction time · co-solvent · ligand ratio
Representative materials: Cu3(HHTP)2 · Cu3(HHB)2 · Cu3(HIB)2 · Cu3(HHTP)(THQ)
Caveat: Requires autoclaves, is difficult to monitor in real time and raises safety concerns.
p003 · 4.1 Hydrothermal and solvothermal methods · Fig. 6; Fig. 12
Immiscible liquid interfaces or air/liquid interfaces confine MOF growth to produce films and nanosheets.
Claimed effects: Can generate large-area nanosheets or thin films with improved crystallinity, morphology and conductivity compared with bulk powders.
Controlling variables: phase incompatibility · interface type · reaction time · ligand concentration · metal-ion diffusion
Representative materials: Ni3(BHT)2 · Cu3(BHT)2 · Ni3(HITP)2 · Fe3(HTTP)2
Caveat: Layer number and large-area uniformity remain hard to control.
p003 · 4.2 Interface-assisted methods · Fig. 7; Fig. 8
Layer-by-layer liquid-phase epitaxy, gas-phase assisted conversion and substrate-based growth are used to orient films on functional substrates.
Claimed effects: Enables oriented thin films with controlled thickness and device-ready substrates.
Controlling variables: substrate · growth cycle number · vapour conversion · film thickness · surface functionalisation
Representative materials: Cu3(HHTP)2 · M3(HHTP)2
Caveat: The review notes solvent consumption and environmental concerns for conventional liquid-phase routes.
p004 · 4.2 Interface-assisted methods · Fig. 9
Non-liquid media are used to grow conductive MOF nanowire arrays at a solid metal/solid ligand interface.
Claimed effects: Provides directly integrated Cu3(HHTP)2-Cu electrodes without additional conductive agent or binder.
Controlling variables: temperature zones · oxygen · water · metal foil · solid ligand deposit
Representative materials: Cu3(HHTP)2 nanowire arrays
Caveat: Presented as promising but not yet broad or industrially mature.
p004 · 4.2 Interface-assisted methods · Fig. 10
These are the review authors’ synthesis, not newly measured results.
The review warns that lithium-storage mechanisms differ by ligand family: HHTP examples are described as pore/interlayer/ligand storage without metal-node redox, whereas Ni3(HITP)2 may involve Ni2+.
Evidence basis: multi_reference
Caveat: Requires primary-paper-level mechanistic verification for each framework.
p005 · 5.1 2D c-MOFs as anode material
Conductivity is framed as depending on carrier density and carrier mobility; carriers can arise from redox reactions, injection or free carriers.
Evidence basis: multi_reference
Caveat: The review's expression is generic and does not substitute for material-specific transport analysis.
p002 · 3.1 Conductive mechanisms of 2D c-MOFs
For cathode use, the review highlights that both organic ligands and metal nodes can participate in ion storage at higher voltage, depending on framework chemistry.
Evidence basis: multi_reference
Caveat: Cu-BHT is noted as a counterexample where Cu2+ reportedly did not participate.
p006 · 5.2 2D c-MOFs as cathode material
The review organises 2D c-MOF transport into hopping, through-bond, extended-conjugation and through-space pathways.
Evidence basis: multi_reference
Caveat: Pathways may coexist; the review does not assign a single mechanism to every benchmark material.
p002 · 3.1 Conductive mechanisms of 2D c-MOFs · Fig. 3
The review says that no reports had yet used in-situ testing to reveal 2D c-MOF electrode structure/electronic-state transitions during cycling, making this a major mechanism gap.
Evidence basis: review_reasoning
Caveat: Statement is as of the 2021 review and should be time-bounded.
p007 · 6. Advanced in-situ characterization methods · Fig. 19
Interfacial synthesis is presented as a route to films/nanosheets that avoid the reduced surface area, active-site exposure and conductivity of irregular bulk particles.
Evidence basis: multi_reference
Caveat: Layer-number control and scalable high-quality film formation remain unresolved.
p003 · 4.2 Interface-assisted methods
Two-contact measurements include sample, contact and connection resistances; four-probe and van der Pauw methods can reduce contact-resistance artefacts.
Evidence basis: multi_reference
Caveat: Method choice is entangled with sample shape and morphology.
p002 · 3.2 Conductivity measurements · Fig. 4
The same 2D c-MOF can show order-of-magnitude conductivity differences across film, nanocrystal and amorphous nanoparticle morphologies, attributed to crystallinity and defects.
Evidence basis: single_reference
Caveat: The review's example is Cu3(HTB)2; generalisation should be checked in primary papers.
p003 · 3.2 Conductivity measurements
The review argues that 2D planar extended pi-conjugation promotes charge-carrier delocalisation and therefore high mobility and conductivity.
Evidence basis: multi_reference
Caveat: Actual conductivity still varies strongly with metal, ligand, stacking, morphology and measurement method.
p001 · Introduction
Redox state and radical population can strongly change conductivity, as illustrated by oxidised versus pristine/reduced Ni3(BHT)2.
Evidence basis: single_reference
Caveat: Example-specific; the magnitude and direction of change depend on framework chemistry.
p002 · 3.1 Conductive mechanisms of 2D c-MOFs
2D c-MOF separator layers can improve Li-S battery behaviour by combining polysulfide capture, Li-ion passage, porosity and electronic conductivity.
Evidence basis: multi_reference
Caveat: Composite MOF/PP separators may also hinder Li-ion migration if too compact or thick.
p006 · 5.3 2D c-MOFs as Separators material · Fig. 17
Pressed particles can obscure intrinsic transport through grain boundaries and defects; single crystals would be more accurate but are difficult to synthesise.
Evidence basis: review_reasoning
Caveat: The review identifies this as a challenge rather than a solved measurement route.
p003 · 3.2 Conductivity measurements
The review states that there is no standard chemical-stability test for conductive MOFs and that XRD alone can overstate stability if only part of a sample survives.
Evidence basis: review_reasoning
Caveat: This is an explicit methodological warning for interpreting stability claims.
p006 · 5.3 2D c-MOFs as Separators material
Changing the ligand or metal node can alter stacking mode and microstructure, which the review treats as a key route to tune electronic structure.
Evidence basis: multi_reference
Caveat: The review gives qualitative linkage more often than directly comparable controlled experiments.
p002 · 2. Chemical structure of 2D c-MOFs · Fig. 2
2D c-MOFs are presented as layered porous materials combining predictable structures, porosity, large surface area, redox-active sites and electronic conductivity.
Evidence basis: review_reasoning
Caveat: This is the review authors' framing, not a measured property of every material in the family.
p001 · Abstract
Every row remains visibly secondary and links to a primary dossier only where the mapping is verified.
| Material | Property | Reported value | Context and quality | Primary evidence | Review source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SecondaryCo-HAB | reversible specific capacity | 291 mA h g-1 | SIB anode; 50 mA g-1 Text · Exact Reported | research_0004 | p005 · 5.1 2D c-MOFs as anode material · Fig. 14J-L |
| SecondaryCo3(HIB)2 | electrical conductivity | 1.57 S cm-1 | pellet; four-probe; room temperature table value Table · Exact Reported | research_0004 | p018 · Table 1 · Table 1 |
| SecondaryCu-CAT NWs | reversible specific capacity | ~631 mA h g-1 | LIB anode; 0.2 A g-1 Text · Approximate | research_0046 | p005 · 5.1 2D c-MOFs as anode material · Fig. 14C-D |
| SecondaryCu-HHB | theoretical capacity | 458 mA h g-1 | LIB cathode; three-electron redox unit Text · Exact Reported | No verified corpus mapping | p006 · 5.2 2D c-MOFs as cathode material · Fig. 16F |
| SecondaryCu3(HHTP)2 | electrical conductivity | 0.2 S cm-1 | room temperature; hydrothermal/solvothermal product Text · Exact Reported | No verified corpus mapping | p001 · 2. Chemical structure of 2D c-MOFs |
| SecondaryCu3(HHTP)(THQ) | electrical conductivity | 2.5 x 10^-5 S cm-1 | pellet; two-contact; room temperature table value Table · Exact Reported | research_0793 | p018 · Table 1 · Table 1 |
| SecondaryCu3(HIB)2 | electrical conductivity | 13 S cm-1 | pellet; van der Pauw; room temperature table value Table · Exact Reported | No verified corpus mapping | p018 · Table 1 · Table 1 |
| SecondaryCu3(HTB)2 | electrical conductivity | 1580 S cm-1 | film; four-probe; room temperature table value Table · Exact Reported | research_0006 | p018 · Table 1 · Table 1 |
| SecondaryCu3(HTB)2 | electrical conductivity | 2500 S cm-1 | film; four-probe; room temperature table value Table · Exact Reported | No verified corpus mapping | p018 · Table 1 · Table 1 |
| SecondaryNi3(BHT)2 | electrical conductivity after oxidation | 1.6 x 10^2 S cm-1 | oxidised state; review-reported redox comparison Text · Exact Reported | research_0361 | p002 · 3.1 Conductive mechanisms of 2D c-MOFs |
| SecondaryNi3(HIB)2 | specific capacity | 155 mA h g-1 | LIB cathode; 10 mA g-1 Text · Exact Reported | No verified corpus mapping | p005 · 5.2 2D c-MOFs as cathode material · Fig. 15D-E |
| SecondaryNi3(HIB)2 | electrical conductivity | 8 S cm-1 | pellet; van der Pauw; room temperature table value Table · Exact Reported | No verified corpus mapping | p018 · Table 1 · Table 1 |
| SecondaryNi3(HITP)2 | electrical conductivity | 40 S cm-1 | film; van der Pauw; room temperature table value Table · Exact Reported | No verified corpus mapping | p018 · Table 1 · Table 1 |
| SecondarySi@Cu3(HITP)2-5 | initial specific discharge capacity | 3201 mA h g-1 | LIB anode composite; 0.1 C; first cycle Text · Exact Reported | research_0777 | p005 · 5.1 2D c-MOFs as anode material · Fig. 14F |
Open questions are presented as review-author priorities, not conclusions from the primary database.
The influence of pore distribution, surface area, active-site distribution and morphology on charge storage remains insufficiently explored.
Proposed direction: Link controlled morphology and pore metrics to electrochemical mechanism and performance using primary studies.
p008 · Conclusions and perspectives
As of this review, in-situ techniques had not yet been used to reveal 2D c-MOF electrode structural/electronic transitions during cycling.
Proposed direction: Combine in-situ XRD, XPS, XAS, Raman, TEM or AFM to track framework, ligand and metal-node changes during cycling.
p007 · 6. Advanced in-situ characterization methods · Fig. 19
The review states that 2D c-MOF yield is not sufficient for practical industrial application.
Proposed direction: Simplify synthesis, reduce material loss, use cheaper ligand precursors and improve productivity.
p004 · 4.3 Electrochemical synthetic method
Large-area, highly oriented, high-quality films or nanosheets remain challenging for interface-assisted methods.
Proposed direction: Improve layer-number, orientation, crystallinity and scale control for device-relevant films.
p004 · 4.2 Interface-assisted methods
More organic ligands are needed to obtain high-conductivity 2D c-MOFs and clarify how redox state controls conductivity.
Proposed direction: Design stable redox-active linkers and suitable metal nodes, then characterise redox and physicochemical states quantitatively.
p007 · Conclusions and perspectives
MOF-modified PP separators can improve Li-S performance but may hinder Li-ion migration when compact or thick.
Proposed direction: Develop pure MOF separators or thinner oriented membranes with balanced polysulfide capture and ion transport.
p006 · 5.3 2D c-MOFs as Separators material
Single-crystal 2D c-MOFs are needed to reduce grain-boundary and defect artefacts in conductivity studies, but they are difficult to synthesise.
Proposed direction: Develop routes to high-quality single crystals or lower-defect films and compare morphology-normalised conductivity.
p003 · 3.2 Conductivity measurements
There is no standard method for evaluating conductive MOF chemical stability, and XRD-only immersion tests can be misleading.
Proposed direction: Use combined XRD, surface-area and pore-size analysis after immersion and electrochemical testing under relevant voltage/electrolyte conditions.
p006 · 5.3 2D c-MOFs as Separators material
Mappings show which printed review references have a verified counterpart in the frozen primary corpus.
| Reference | Study | Role and context | Corpus mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ref. 192021 | Si nanoparticles confined within a conductive 2D porous Cu-based metal-organic framework (Cu3(HITP)2) as potential anodes for high-capacity Li-ion batteries | anode_composite · application_benchmarkUsed as the review's example of a silicon/2D c-MOF composite anode with improved diffusion, conductivity and cycling behaviour. | research_0777 |
| Ref. 362020 | Ultrathin two-dimensional conjugated metal-organic framework single-crystalline nanosheets enabled by surfactant-assisted synthesis | nanosheet_synthesis · cathode_contextCited for ultrathin Cu-HHB nanosheets that improve ion transport and active-site utilisation relative to bulk materials. | research_0043 |
| Ref. 382012 | New Porous Crystals of Extended Metal-Catecholates | historical_first_2d_cmof · conductivity_benchmarkIdentified by the review as the first 2D c-MOF report and as a baseline hydrothermal Cu3(HHTP)2 conductivity example. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 502018 | High-mobility band-like charge transport in a semiconducting two-dimensional metal-organic framework | transport_mechanism · interfacial_filmUsed for an interfacial Fe3(HTTP)2 film example and a high-mobility band-like transport context. | research_0001 |
| Ref. 542016 | Electrically Conductive Porous Metal-Organic Frameworks | transport_framework · ligand_metal_designCited for the review's classification of charge-transport pathways and ligand/coordination effects on conductivity. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 652018 | Synthetic Routes for a 2D Semiconductive Copper Hexahydroxybenzene Metal-Organic Framework | ligand_family · conductivity_benchmarkUsed for the benzene-linker HHB family, hydrothermal synthesis routes and a low Cu3(HHB)2 conductivity benchmark. | research_0792 |
| Ref. 692018 | Stabilization of Hexaaminobenzene in a 2D Conductive Metal-Organic Framework for High Power Sodium Storage | sodium_anode · conductivity_benchmark · storage_mechanismSupports the review's Co-HAB sodium-ion anode example and its ligand-centred storage interpretation. | research_0004 |
| Ref. 702017 | Signature of Metallic Behavior in the Metal-Organic Frameworks M3(hexaiminobenzene)2 (M = Ni, Cu) | metallic_behaviour · conductivity_benchmarkCited for metallic behaviour and high room-temperature conductivities in Cu/Ni hexaiminobenzene frameworks. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 752014 | High Electrical Conductivity in Ni3(2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenylene)2, a Semiconducting Metal-Organic Graphene Analogue | conductivity_benchmark · triphenylene_familyUsed for Ni3(HITP)2 as a high-conductivity triphenylene imine framework benchmark. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 882019 | Conductive metal-organic framework with redox metal center as cathode for high rate performance lithium ion battery | cathode_mechanism · redox_metal_centerUsed for Cu3(HHTP)2 as a LIB cathode where Cu redox centres contribute to storage. | research_0273 |
| Ref. 902020 | Highly Conductive Two-Dimensional Metal-Organic Frameworks for Resilient Lithium Storage with Superb Rate Capability | lithium_storage · stability_exampleUsed for Cu-BHT lithium storage and for chemical-stability testing examples in electrolytes and harsh media. | research_0365 |
| Ref. 912013 | pi-Conjugated Nickel Bis(dithiolene) Complex Nanosheet | interfacial_synthesis · conductivity_benchmarkCited for the first liquid-liquid Ni3(BHT)2 nanosheets and related conductivity values in Table 1. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 942014 | Redox Control and High Conductivity of Nickel Bis(dithiolene) Complex pi-Nanosheet: A Potential Organic Two-Dimensional Topological Insulator | redox_conductivity · conductivity_benchmarkSupports the review claim that oxidation/reduction alters free radicals and hence conductivity in Ni3(BHT)2. | research_0361 |
| Ref. 952018 | Multielectron-Transfer-based Rechargeable Energy Storage of Two-Dimensional Coordination Frameworks with Non-Innocent Ligands | cathode_benchmark · non_innocent_ligandsUsed for Ni3(HIB)2 as a cathode with Li+/PF6- insertion and multielectron storage. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 962020 | Electrically Conductive Metal-Organic Frameworks | transport_review · band_structure_contextThe review reprints the transport-pathway schematic from this source and uses it to frame conductive MOF mechanisms. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 972015 | Metal-organic Kagome lattices M3(2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenylene)2 (M = Ni and Cu): from semiconducting to metallic by metal substitution | electronic_structure · metal_substitutionUsed for the review's Ni versus Cu electronic-structure contrast in HITP frameworks. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 1052012 | Electrical conductive coordination polymers | measurement_methodsCited for measurement methods including two-contact, four-contact, four-probe and van der Pauw approaches. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 1082015 | A two-dimensional pi-d conjugated coordination polymer with extremely high electrical conductivity and ambipolar transport behaviour | interfacial_film · conductivity_benchmarkUsed as the principal high-conductivity Cu3(BHT)2 film example from liquid-liquid interfacial synthesis. | research_0006 |
| Ref. 1092018 | Superconductivity in a Copper(II)-Based Coordination Polymer with Perfect Kagome Structure | conductivity_benchmark · kagome_structureUsed for the review's highest Table 1 conductivity benchmark for a Cu3(HTB)2 film. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 1112020 | Continuous Electrical Conductivity Variation in M3(Hexaiminotriphenylene)2 (M = Co, Ni, Cu) MOF Alloys | metal_node_effect · conductivity_benchmarkSupports the review claim that metal-node composition tunes conductivity in M3(HITP)2 alloys. | research_0041 |
| Ref. 1172019 | Oriented Thin Films of Electroactive Triphenylene Catecholate-Based Two-Dimensional Metal-Organic Frameworks | oriented_thin_films · conductivity_benchmarkUsed for gas-phase assisted conversion to oriented triphenylene catecholate films and Table 1 conductivity entries. | research_0137 |
| Ref. 1212020 | A Dual-Ligand Porous Coordination Polymer Chemiresistor with Modulated Conductivity and Porosity | dual_ligand_design · porosity_conductivityUsed for the dual-ligand HHTP/THQ example where coordination strength and synthesis conditions tune product formation. | research_0793 |
| Ref. 1252018 | Large-Area Preparation of Crack-Free Crystalline Microporous Conductive Membrane to Upgrade High Energy Lithium-Sulfur Batteries | separator · interface_induced_growthCited for interface-induced Ni3(HITP)2 separator membranes in Li-S batteries. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 1282020 | Solid-solid interface growth of conductive metal-organic framework nanowire arrays and their supercapacitor application | solid_solid_growth · binder_free_electrodeUsed for solid-solid CVD-like Cu3(HHTP)2 nanowire arrays on copper foil for direct device integration. | research_0774 |
| Ref. 1322021 | Electrochemical Synthesis of Large Area Two-Dimensional Metal-Organic Framework Films on Copper Anodes | electrochemical_synthesis · transferable_filmUsed as the review's main electrochemical synthesis example for large-area, transferable Cu3(HHTP)2 films on copper foil. | research_0076 |
| Ref. 1342019 | Bottom-Up Fabrication of 1D Cu-based Conductive Metal-Organic Framework Nanowires as a High-Rate Anode towards Efficient Lithium Storage | anode_benchmark · lithium_storageUsed for the review's 1D Cu-CAT nanowire anode benchmark and lithium-storage mechanism interpretation. | research_0046 |
| Ref. 1392020 | A Redox-Active 2D Metal-Organic Framework for Efficient Lithium Storage with Extraordinary High Capacity | cathode_benchmark · redox_mechanismUsed for the review's high-capacity Cu-HHB cathode benchmark and HHB/Cu redox-storage mechanism. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 1402019 | Conductive MOF-Modified Separator for Mitigating the Shuttle Effect of Lithium-Sulfur Battery through a Filtration Method | separator · polysulfide_shuttleUsed for Ni3(HITP)2-modified polypropylene separators that capture polysulfides in lithium-sulfur batteries. | research_0778 |
| Ref. 1412019 | Ultrathin MOF nanosheet assembled highly oriented microporous membrane as an interlayer for lithium-sulfur batteries | pure_mof_separator · separator_outlookUsed as an example of moving beyond PP-supported separators toward highly oriented flexible MOF films for Li-S batteries. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 1422021 | Chemically Stable Metal-Organic Frameworks: Rational Construction and Application Expansion | stability_design · application_caveatCited for the review's stability-design recommendations: polymerisation, stable ligands and suitable metal nodes. | Unmapped |