Liu Y., Yao H., Zhang H. et al. · Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025 · 48127-48135
Open a family to keep every result attached to its sample, method and conditions.
Paraphrased for this database from the authors’ stated interpretations — never quoted verbatim — and kept separate from reported measurements.
The isolated ligand thin films did not show detectable hole or electron mobility, so conductive transport evidence is associated with MOF frameworks rather than standalone ligands.
Caveat: Applies to the tested ligand thin-film FET configurations.
8 and 47 · OFET devices fabrications and testing · Figure S35 · Linked to 1 structured result
The lower Cu3F2HHTP2 conductivity observed after cryostat mounting is attributed to irreversible mechanical damage during device preparation and helium/vacuum cycling, not intrinsic material behaviour.
Caveat: This explanation is the authors' proposed interpretation of a before/after device comparison.
82-83 · Figure S66 · Figure S66 · Linked to 2 structured results
Cu3F2HHTP2 forms a rare bridged bilayer/wavy layered structure with interlayer Cu-O coordination and pentacoordinate Cu sites.
Caveat: Underlying CIFs were not locally available; assignment is taken from article/SI text and figures.
5 · Results and Discussion · Figure 4c,f,i · Linked to 5 structured results
Asymmetrical fluorine substitution of HHTP modulates electrostatic potential distributions and controls stacking modes in both ligand crystals and the resulting Cu-MOFs.
Caveat: The mechanistic interpretation relies on structural models and computed electrostatic/electronic interactions.
1-2 · Abstract and Results and Discussion · Figure 1 · Linked to 5 structured results
The authors infer that BET surface areas are governed by interlayer stacking mode, with larger interlayer distance favouring gas adsorption and corrugation in Cu3F2HHTP2 partly recovering surface area.
Caveat: The porosity explanation is a hypothesis/inference rather than a direct mechanistic measurement.
5 · Results and Discussion · Linked to 5 structured results
Interlayer binding-energy calculations support the strongest interlayer interaction for Cu3F2HHTP2.
Caveat: Computational result, not an experimental measurement.
5 · Results and Discussion · Figure S62 · Linked to 3 structured results
Cu3F2HHTP2 has the highest room-temperature single-crystal conductivity and Hall electron mobility in the three-MOF series.
Caveat: Temperature-dependent cryostat measurements of Cu3F2HHTP2 were affected by device degradation.
6 · Results and Discussion · Figure 5h · Linked to 6 structured results
The fluorination strategy raises carrier mobility but can reduce carrier density, so conductivity is controlled by a balance of mobility and carrier concentration.
Caveat: Carrier concentration anomaly is attributed to structural defects; defect concentration is not directly quantified in the extracted text.
7 · Results and Discussion · Figure 5h · Linked to 5 structured results
Names and aliases are kept exactly within the paper’s own identity model.
| Material | Composition | Structure context | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cu3F2HHTP2 | Cu3F2HHTP2Cu catecholate nodes plus interlayer Cu-O coordination; square-planar and pentacoordinate Cu environments · F2HHTP (1,4-difluorotriphenylene-2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaol) | 2D · PristineWavy layered 2D framework with bridged bilayer sheets and interlayer Cu-O coordination. | 5-6 · Results and Discussion · Figure 4c,f,i |
| Cu3FHHTP2 | Cu3FHHTP2Cu catecholate nodes; square-planar CuO4 units · FHHTP (1-fluorotriphenylene-2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaol) | 2D · PristineFluorinated 2D layered framework adopting antiparallel stacking driven by complementary electrostatic potentials. | 2-4 · Results and Discussion · Figure 2c and Figure 4 |
| Cu3HHTP2Browse family: Cu₃(HHTP)₂ / Cu–HHTP | Cu3HHTP2Cu catecholate nodes; square-planar CuO4 units · HHTP (2,3,6,7,10,11-hexahydroxytriphenylene) | 2D · Pristine2D honeycomb sheets with slipped parallel/4-fold interpenetrated stacking; orthorhombic Cmcm model from PXRD/Pawley and prior single-crystal report. | 4-5 · Results and Discussion · Figure 4 and Figure 5 |
| F2HHTP ligand crystal/model | C18H10F2O6F2HHTP | 0D · Model SystemMolecular crystal/model with nearly antiparallel cofacial stacking. | 3 · Results and Discussion · Figure 3i-l |
| FHHTP ligand crystal/model | C18H11FO6FHHTP | 0D · Model SystemMolecular crystal/model with slipped 1D stacking. | 3 · Results and Discussion · Figure 3e-h |
| HHTP ligand crystal/model | C18H12O6HHTP | 0D · Model SystemMolecular crystal/model used for packing and transfer-integral comparison. | 3 · Results and Discussion · Figure 3a-d |
Sample form, processing state and composition status define the context for measurements.
| Sample | Form and role | Processing and geometry | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cu3F2HHTP2 Hall pelletresearch_0089__mat__cu3f2hhtp2 | Pellet · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | MOF powder compressed into a circular pellet for AC-field Hall measurement.pre-processed glass substrate with gold electrode | 8 and 71 · Hall effect measurements · Figures S55 and S58 |
| Cu3F2HHTP2 blue powder/rod crystalsresearch_0089__mat__cu3f2hhtp2 | Powder · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | Blue powder isolated by centrifugation and solvent washing; rod-like crystals exceeding 5 um. | 12 · Synthesis of Cu3F2HHTP2 |
| Cu3F2HHTP2 single-crystal deviceresearch_0089__mat__cu3f2hhtp2 | Single Crystal · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | Drop-cast fibre/crystal devices with four-contact Ti/Au geometry.Si/SiO2 chip with lithographed Ti/Au contacts · Device diameters in Table S4: 213, 151, 333, and 202 nm | 64-65 · Electrical conductivity device statistics · Figures S49-S52; Table S4 |
| Cu3FHHTP2 Hall pelletresearch_0089__mat__cu3fhhtp2 | Pellet · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | MOF powder compressed into a circular pellet for AC-field Hall measurement.pre-processed glass substrate with gold electrode | 8 and 70 · Hall effect measurements · Figures S54 and S57 |
| Cu3FHHTP2 blue powder/rod crystalsresearch_0089__mat__cu3fhhtp2 | Powder · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | Blue powder isolated by centrifugation and solvent washing; rod-like crystals exceeding 5 um. | 12 · Synthesis of Cu3FHHTP2 |
| Cu3FHHTP2 single-crystal deviceresearch_0089__mat__cu3fhhtp2 | Single Crystal · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | Drop-cast fibre/crystal devices with four-contact Ti/Au geometry.Si/SiO2 chip with lithographed Ti/Au contacts · Device diameters in Table S4: 150, 196, 190, and 101 nm | 63-65 · Electrical conductivity device statistics · Figures S48-S51; Table S4 |
| Cu3HHTP2 Hall pelletresearch_0089__mat__cu3hhtp2 | Pellet · Pristine Control · Pristine Framework | MOF powder compressed into a circular pellet for AC-field Hall measurement.pre-processed glass substrate with gold electrode | 8 · Hall effect measurements · Figures S53 and S56 |
| Cu3HHTP2 powder/rod crystalsresearch_0089__mat__cu3hhtp2 | Powder · Pristine Control · Pristine Framework | Nanorod powder; used for PXRD, SEM, HRTEM, porosity, spectroscopy and as source material for devices. | 4 · Results and Discussion · Figure S23 |
| Cu3HHTP2 single-crystal deviceresearch_0089__mat__cu3hhtp2 | Single Crystal · Pristine Control · Pristine Framework | Fibres suspended in hexane, drop-cast, annealed, patterned by electron-beam lithography and contacted with Ti/Au.Si/SiO2 chip with lithographed Ti/Au contacts · Device diameters in Table S4: 246, 313, 294, and 336 nm | 8 and 65 · Variable temperature electrical conductivity measurement; Table S4 · Table S4 |
| F2HHTP molecular crystal/modelresearch_0089__mat__f2hhtp_ligand | Model · Model System · Model | Ligand single-crystal packing and stacked-dimer model. | 52 · Table S3 · Table S3 |
| FHHTP molecular crystal/modelresearch_0089__mat__fhhtp_ligand | Model · Model System · Model | Ligand single-crystal packing and stacked-dimer model. | 51 · Table S2 · Table S2 |
| HHTP molecular crystal/modelresearch_0089__mat__hhtp_ligand | Model · Model System · Model | Ligand single-crystal packing and stacked-dimer model. | 3 · Results and Discussion · Figure 3 |