Real-time infrared temperature monitoring, EDS and ICP elemental analysis across microwave pulse number
Zn,Ni-CAT-T4 · Electrode
Microwave pulses at 2450 MHz and 900 W; T1-T4 correspond to 1-4 pulses of 5 s each.
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single-pulse peak temperature rise | 649.2 C within 4 s | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 5 · 3.3. Optimization of bimetallic MOFs by microwave · Figure 4a |
| Temperature drop after pulse suspension | drop 250 C within 1 s | — | — | Text Rounded Reported | 5 · 3.3. Optimization of bimetallic MOFs by microwave · Figure 4a |
| Zn/Ni atomic ratio by EDS for Zn,Ni-CAT-T1 | 3.53 % | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 6 · 3.3. Optimization of bimetallic MOFs by microwave · Figure 4b |
| Zn/Ni atomic ratio by EDS for Zn,Ni-CAT-T2 | 10.05 % | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 6 · 3.3. Optimization of bimetallic MOFs by microwave · Figure 4b |
| Zn/Ni atomic ratio by EDS for Zn,Ni-CAT-T3 | 12.99 % | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 6 · 3.3. Optimization of bimetallic MOFs by microwave · Figure 4b |
| Zn/Ni atomic ratio by EDS for Zn,Ni-CAT-T4Marked as a best value within this paper | 14.53 % | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 6 · 3.3. Optimization of bimetallic MOFs by microwave · Figure 4b |
| Zn/Ni atomic ratio by ICP for Zn,Ni-CAT-T4Marked as a best value within this paper | 16.53 % | — | standard deviations all less than 0.21 % for four groups | Text Exact Reported | 6 · 3.3. Optimization of bimetallic MOFs by microwave · Tables S1 and S2 |