| ppb calibration slope | y = 0.067x + 2.2 | — | — | Figure Axis Rounded Reported | p005 / 1314 · Results and Discussion · Figure 5a inset |
| ppm calibration slope | y = 34.6x + 3.9 | — | — | Figure Axis Rounded Reported | p010 / S-9 · Supporting Information · Figure S7b |
| Linearity R2, ppb H2S range | R2 = 0.9704 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | p006 / 1316 · Results and Discussion · Figure 5a |
| Linearity R2, ppm H2S range | R2 = 0.9952 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | p006 / 1316 · Results and Discussion · Figure S7 |
| Theoretical LoD from 3RMSMarked as a best value within this paper | approximately 10.3 ppb | — | — | Text Approximate | p006 / 1316 · Results and Discussion |
| Reported LoD in comparison tableMarked as a best value within this paper | 50 ppb | — | — | Table Exact Reported | p006 / 1315 · Results and Discussion · Table 1 |
| Cu2O response to 50 ppm H2S | about 315% | — | — | Visual Estimate Approximate | p005 / 1314 · Results and Discussion · Figure 4b |
| Cu2O@CuHHTP-1 response to 50 ppm H2S | about 285% | — | — | Visual Estimate Approximate | p005 / 1314 · Results and Discussion · Figure 4b |
| Cu2O@CuHHTP-3 response to 50 ppm H2SMarked as a best value within this paper | about 225% | — | — | Visual Estimate Approximate | p005 / 1314 · Results and Discussion · Figure 4b |
| Cu2O@CuHHTP-5 response to 50 ppm H2S | about 135% | — | — | Visual Estimate Approximate | p005 / 1314 · Results and Discussion · Figure 4b |
| Cu2O@CuHHTP-3 response to 10 ppm H2SMarked as a best value within this paper | 49.9% | — | — | Table Exact Reported | p006 / 1315 · Results and Discussion · Table 1 |