Other — In Situ Growth of Conductive Metal-Organic Framework onto Cu2O for Highly Selective and Humidity-Independent Hydrogen Sulfide Detection in Food Quality Assessment

Measurement evidence

Other

In Situ Growth of Conductive Metal-Organic Framework onto Cu2O for Highly Selective and Humidity-Independent Hydrogen Sulfide Detection in Food Quality Assessment · Zhang F., Jiao C., Shang Y. et al. · ACS Sensors · 2024 · 1310-1320

2 measurement groups · 5 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

Water contact-angle measurement

Contact angle and wettability

Cu2O@CuHHTP-3 powder · Powder

Contact angle of water droplet on Cu2O and Cu2O@CuHHTP-n samples using DSA30 drop shape analyser.

Atmosphere: air
Geometry: pressed/coated sample surface as shown in Figure 8b
Context: CuHHTP coating thickness series
Measurement source: p008 / 1317 · Results and Discussion · Figure 8b

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
Water contact angle, Cu2O	0 deg	—	—	Text Exact Reported	p008 / 1317 · Results and Discussion · Figure 8b
Water contact angle, Cu2O@CuHHTP-1	42 deg	—	—	Text Exact Reported	p008 / 1317 · Results and Discussion · Figure 8b
Water contact angle, Cu2O@CuHHTP-3Marked as a best value within this paper	54 deg	—	—	Text Exact Reported	p008 / 1317 · Results and Discussion · Figure 8b
Water contact angle, Cu2O@CuHHTP-5	73 deg	—	—	Text Exact Reported	p008 / 1317 · Results and Discussion · Figure 8b

Thermogravimetric analysis in N2

Thermogravimetric analysis

Cu2O@CuHHTP-3 powder · Powder

Samples dried under vacuum at 80 C overnight, exposed to 94 RH% for 2 h, then TG curves measured in N2.

Atmosphere: N2 during TG; prior 94 RH% exposure
Geometry: powder samples
Context: Cu2O vs Cu2O@CuHHTP-n moisture uptake comparison
Measurement source: p025 / S-24 · Supporting Information · Figure S21

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
Moisture weight loss comparison	Cu2O@CuHHTP-n weight loss is less than Cu2O	—	—	Qualitative Qualitative	p008 / 1317 · Results and Discussion · Figure S21