Meng T., Shang N., Zhao J. et al. · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · 2021 · 135-146
Open a family to keep every result attached to its sample, method and conditions.
Paraphrased for this database from the authors’ stated interpretations — never quoted verbatim — and kept separate from reported measurements.
Co CPSs/MPC-2 is the best-performing composite for glucose oxidation and sensing among the tested MPC loading series.
Caveat: Application performance is from alkaline electrochemical testing on drop-cast GCEs; no direct bulk transport measurement is reported.
141 · 3.2 · Fig. 5; Fig. 9 · Linked to 5 structured results
Co CPSs/MPC-2-GCE shows high selectivity against tested interferents and acceptable recovery in human serum samples.
Caveat: Serum table provides recovery/RSD but not full matrix handling details.
141-144 · 3.2 · Fig. 10; Table 2 · Linked to 7 structured results
MPC provides excellent conductivity and lowers the charge-transfer resistance of Co CPSs/MPC relative to pristine Co CPSs-GCE.
Caveat: Evidence is electrochemical impedance in redox electrolyte rather than direct four-probe conductivity.
140 · 3.2 · Fig. 4 · Linked to 3 structured results
FT-IR shift of the C=O stretching band indicates coordination of isophthalate carboxylate groups to Co2+ in Co CPSs.
Caveat: No crystal structure or formula is reported; the material is described as amorphous.
138 · 3.1 · Fig. 2 · Linked to 1 structured result
The high Cdl and ECSA of Co CPSs/MPC-GCE indicate more effective active sites, supporting enhanced glucose oxidation.
Caveat: Cdl/ECSA values are electrochemical estimates, not direct surface-area measurements.
141 · 3.2 · Fig. S4; Table S1 · Linked to 3 structured results
Glucose oxidation on MPC-GCE, Co CPSs-GCE and Co CPSs/MPC-2-GCE is assigned as diffusion-controlled based on current increasing with square root of scan rate.
Caveat: The fitted slopes/R values are shown in figures but not tabulated in text.
141 · 3.2 · Fig. 6B,D,F · Linked to 2 structured results
Names and aliases are kept exactly within the paper’s own identity model.
| Material | Composition | Structure context | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Co coordination polymer spheres | Co-isophthalate coordination polymer, exact formula not reportedCo cations, Co(II)/Co(III) detected by XPS · isophthalic acid-derived carboxylate ligands | unknown · Pristineamorphous coordination polymer microspheres | 135-137 · Abstract; 2.2; 3.1 · Fig. 1A; Fig. 2 |
| Co CPSs/MPC | Co coordination polymer spheres on macroporous carbonCo cations in Co coordination polymer spheres · isophthalic acid-derived carboxylate ligands | 3D · CompositeCo CPSs uniformly dispersed on MPC; composite retains Co CPSs FT-IR features | 137-139 · 2.3; 3.1 · Fig. 1C-D; Fig. 3 |
| Glassy carbon electrode sensor platform | Not specified | unknown · Model Systemthree-electrode electrochemical test platform | 2-3 · Preparation of the modified electrodes |
| 3D macroporous carbon | C | 3D · Derivedinterconnected macroporous carbon support | 2 · Synthesis of MPC |
Sample form, processing state and composition status define the context for measurements.
| Sample | Form and role | Processing and geometry | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| bare GCEresearch_0511__mat__gce_electrode_system | Electrode · Pristine Control · Model | polished and ultrasonicated in ethanol and waterglassy carbon electrode | 2-3 · Preparation of the modified electrodes |
| Co CPSs-GCEresearch_0511__mat__co_cps | Electrode · Pristine Control · Pristine Framework | 5 uL of 2 mg mL^-1 Co CPSs/DMF suspension drop-cast and dried at 25 deg Cglassy carbon electrode | 139-141 · 3.2 · Fig. 4; Fig. 5B |
| Co CPSs/MPC-1research_0511__mat__co_cps_mpc | Powder · Composite Sample · Composite | hydrothermal composite made with 5 mg MPC | 137 · 2.3 |
| Co CPSs/MPC-2-GCEresearch_0511__mat__co_cps_mpc | Electrode · Target Sample · Composite | 5 uL of 2 mg mL^-1 Co CPSs/MPC-2/DMF suspension drop-cast and dried at 25 deg Cglassy carbon electrode | 141-143 · 3.2 · Fig. 7; Fig. 9 |
| Co CPSs/MPC-2research_0511__mat__co_cps_mpc | Powder · Target Sample · Composite | hydrothermal composite made with 10 mg MPC | 141 · 3.2 · Fig. 5D |
| Co CPSs/MPC-3research_0511__mat__co_cps_mpc | Powder · Composite Sample · Composite | hydrothermal composite made with 20 mg MPC | 137 · 2.3 |
| Co CPSs/MPC-4research_0511__mat__co_cps_mpc | Powder · Composite Sample · Composite | hydrothermal composite made with 40 mg MPC | 137 · 2.3 |
| Co CPSsresearch_0511__mat__co_cps | Powder · Pristine Control · Pristine Framework | centrifuged, washed with DMF, dried at 60 deg C | 137 · 2.2 · Fig. 1A |
| Modified glassy-carbon electrode comparison seriesresearch_0511__mat__gce_electrode_system | Electrode · Paper Level Unspecified · Composite | paper_level_unspecified | 2-3 · Preparation of the modified electrodes |
| MPC-GCEresearch_0511__mat__mpc | Electrode · Pristine Control · Derived Carbon | 5 uL of 2 mg mL^-1 MPC/DMF suspension drop-cast and dried at 25 deg Cglassy carbon electrode | 2-3 · Preparation of the modified electrodes |
| MPCresearch_0511__mat__mpc | Powder · Composite Component · Derived Carbon | SiO2-templated sucrose carbon, carbonised under N2 and HF-etched | 2 · Synthesis of MPC · Fig. S1; Fig. 1B |