Electrochemistry Application — Simultaneous defect passivation and hole mobility enhancement of perovskite solar cells by incorporating anionic metal-organic framework into hole transport materials

12 measurement groups · 89 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

ambient dark storage stability

PSC with HTM-FJU-17 DFL · Electrode

Encapsulated PSCs, 50-70% RH, about 25 degC, dark, air, 1000 h.

Temperature: 298
Atmosphere: air, 50-70% RH, dark
Geometry: encapsulated PSC
Context: pristine control versus MOF-HTM composite
Measurement source: Figure S13 caption · Fig. S13

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
normalised PCE retained after 1000 h ambient storage, HTM-FJU-17Marked as a best value within this paper	90%	0.9 fraction of initial PCE	—	Text Rounded Reported	5 · 3. Results and discussion · Fig. 2f; Fig. S13
normalised PCE retained after 1000 h ambient storage, pristine HTM	30%	0.3 fraction of initial PCE	only	Text Approximate	5 · 3. Results and discussion · Fig. 2f; Fig. S13

cyclic voltammetry

Voltammetry

synthesised FJU-17 powder · Powder

CHI600A; Pt disc working electrode, Pt wire counter, Ag/AgCl reference, 50 mV/s, 0.1 M Bu4NPF6 acetonitrile; potentials referenced to Fc/Fc+.

Geometry: electrochemical cell
Context: pristine MOF component and spiro-OMeTAD comparison
Measurement source: 6,14 · Figure S7 and Table S4 · Fig. S7; Table S4

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
ferrocene reference potential	0.36 V versus Ag/AgCl	—	—	Visual Estimate Approximate	6 · Figure S7 · Fig. S7b
oxidation onset potential FJU-17Marked as a best value within this paper	0.61 V versus Ag/AgCl	—	—	Visual Estimate Approximate	6 · Figure S7 · Fig. S7a
oxidation onset potential spiro-OMeTAD	0.40 V versus Ag/AgCl	—	—	Visual Estimate Approximate	6 · Figure S7 · Fig. S7a
optical band gap FJU-17Marked as a best value within this paper	3.08 eV	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	14 · Table S4 · Table S4
HOMO from CV FJU-17Marked as a best value within this paper	-5.35 eV	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	14 · Table S4 · Table S4
intersection wavelength FJU-17	403 nm	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	14 · Table S4 · Table S4
LUMO FJU-17	-2.27 eV	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	14 · Table S4 · Table S4
optical band gap spiro-OMeTAD	2.79 eV	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	14 · Table S4 · Table S4
HOMO from CV spiro-OMeTAD	-5.14 eV	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	14 · Table S4 · Table S4
intersection wavelength spiro-OMeTAD	444 nm	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	14 · Table S4 · Table S4
LUMO spiro-OMeTAD	-2.35 eV	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	14 · Table S4 · Table S4

solar-cell J-V parameter screening versus FJU-10 amount

HTM-FJU-10 film · Thin Film

Average photovoltaic parameters for PSCs with 0.00, 0.25, 0.50, 1.00 and 2.00 mg FJU-10 in HTM.

Geometry: PSC with HTM-FJU-10
Context: cationic MOF-HTM control amount series
Measurement source: 15 · Table S7 · Table S7

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
average FF at 0.00 mg FJU-10	74%	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	15 · Table S7 · Table S7
average Jsc at 0.00 mg FJU-10	23.44 mA/cm2	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	15 · Table S7 · Table S7
average PCE at 0.00 mg FJU-10Marked as a best value within this paper	17.63%	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	15 · Table S7 · Table S7
average Voc at 0.00 mg FJU-10	1.02 V	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	15 · Table S7 · Table S7
average FF at 0.25 mg FJU-10	72%	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	15 · Table S7 · Table S7
average Jsc at 0.25 mg FJU-10	23.10 mA/cm2	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	15 · Table S7 · Table S7
average PCE at 0.25 mg FJU-10	17.16%	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	15 · Table S7 · Table S7
average Voc at 0.25 mg FJU-10	1.03 V	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	15 · Table S7 · Table S7
average FF at 0.50 mg FJU-10	73%	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	15 · Table S7 · Table S7
average Jsc at 0.50 mg FJU-10	22.93 mA/cm2	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	15 · Table S7 · Table S7
average PCE at 0.50 mg FJU-10	17.02%	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	15 · Table S7 · Table S7
average Voc at 0.50 mg FJU-10	1.01 V	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	15 · Table S7 · Table S7
average FF at 1.00 mg FJU-10	74%	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	15 · Table S7 · Table S7
average Jsc at 1.00 mg FJU-10	21.88 mA/cm2	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	15 · Table S7 · Table S7
average PCE at 1.00 mg FJU-10	16.42%	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	15 · Table S7 · Table S7
average Voc at 1.00 mg FJU-10	1.02 V	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	15 · Table S7 · Table S7
average FF at 2.00 mg FJU-10	73%	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	15 · Table S7 · Table S7
average Jsc at 2.00 mg FJU-10	21.82 mA/cm2	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	15 · Table S7 · Table S7
average PCE at 2.00 mg FJU-10	15.47%	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	15 · Table S7 · Table S7
average Voc at 2.00 mg FJU-10	0.96 V	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	15 · Table S7 · Table S7

solar-cell J-V parameter screening versus FJU-17 amount

PSC with HTM-FJU-17 DFL · Electrode

Average photovoltaic parameters for PSCs with 0.00, 0.25, 0.50, 1.00 and 2.00 mg FJU-17 in HTM.

Geometry: FTO/TiO2/CH3NH3PbI3/HTM/Ag
Context: pristine HTM control and MOF-HTM composite amount series
Measurement source: 13 · Table S1 · Table S1

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
average FF at 0.00 mg FJU-17	74%	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	13 · Table S1 · Table S1
average Jsc at 0.00 mg FJU-17	23.44 mA/cm2	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	13 · Table S1 · Table S1
average PCE at 0.00 mg FJU-17	17.77%	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	13 · Table S1 · Table S1
average Voc at 0.00 mg FJU-17	1.02 V	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	13 · Table S1 · Table S1
average FF at 0.25 mg FJU-17	76%	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	13 · Table S1 · Table S1
average Jsc at 0.25 mg FJU-17	23.51 mA/cm2	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	13 · Table S1 · Table S1
average PCE at 0.25 mg FJU-17	17.97%	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	13 · Table S1 · Table S1
average Voc at 0.25 mg FJU-17	1.00 V	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	13 · Table S1 · Table S1
average FF at 0.50 mg FJU-17	76%	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	13 · Table S1 · Table S1
average Jsc at 0.50 mg FJU-17	24.52 mA/cm2	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	13 · Table S1 · Table S1
average PCE at 0.50 mg FJU-17Marked as a best value within this paper	19.50%	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	13 · Table S1 · Table S1
average Voc at 0.50 mg FJU-17	1.05 V	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	13 · Table S1 · Table S1
average FF at 1.00 mg FJU-17	74%	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	13 · Table S1 · Table S1
average Jsc at 1.00 mg FJU-17	23.51 mA/cm2	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	13 · Table S1 · Table S1
average PCE at 1.00 mg FJU-17	17.56%	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	13 · Table S1 · Table S1
average Voc at 1.00 mg FJU-17	1.01 V	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	13 · Table S1 · Table S1
average FF at 2.00 mg FJU-17	74%	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	13 · Table S1 · Table S1
average Jsc at 2.00 mg FJU-17	22.69 mA/cm2	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	13 · Table S1 · Table S1
average PCE at 2.00 mg FJU-17	17.10%	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	13 · Table S1 · Table S1
average Voc at 2.00 mg FJU-17	1.02 V	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	13 · Table S1 · Table S1

forward/reverse J-V hysteresis analysis

PSC with HTM-FJU-17 DFL · Electrode

Comparison of hysteresis index for pristine HTM and HTM-FJU-17 devices.

Geometry: PSC
Context: pristine control versus MOF-HTM composite
Measurement source: 4 · 3. Results and discussion · Fig. 1b; Table S2

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
hysteresis index HTM-FJU-17Marked as a best value within this paper	0.220	—	—	Text Exact Reported	4 · 3. Results and discussion · Fig. 1b; Table S2
hysteresis index pristine HTM	0.305	—	—	Text Exact Reported	4 · 3. Results and discussion · Fig. 1b; Table S2

IPCE spectrum with integrated current density

Photoresponse and photoelectrochemistry

PSC with HTM-FJU-17 DFL · Electrode

IPCE of pristine HTM and HTM-FJU-17 PSCs over the measured wavelength range.

Geometry: PSC
Context: pristine control versus MOF-HTM composite
Measurement source: 4 · 3. Results and discussion · Fig. 1f

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
integrated current density from IPCE, HTM-FJU-17Marked as a best value within this paper	22.10 mA cm-2	—	—	Text Exact Reported	4 · 3. Results and discussion · Fig. 1f
integrated current density from IPCE, pristine HTM	20.68 mA cm-2	—	—	Text Exact Reported	4 · 3. Results and discussion · Fig. 1f

forward and reverse J-V scan photovoltaic parameters

PSC with HTM-FJU-17 DFL · Electrode

Forward and reverse scan values used to calculate hysteresis indices for pristine HTM and HTM-FJU-17 PSCs.

Geometry: PSC
Context: pristine HTM control versus HTM-FJU-17 composite device
Measurement source: 13 · Table S2 · Table S2

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
FF HTM-FJU-17 forward scan	64%	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	13 · Table S2 · Table S2
Jsc HTM-FJU-17 forward scan	24.87 mA/cm2	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	13 · Table S2 · Table S2
PCE HTM-FJU-17 forward scan	15.87%	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	13 · Table S2 · Table S2
Voc HTM-FJU-17 forward scan	0.99 V	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	13 · Table S2 · Table S2
FF HTM-FJU-17 reverse scan	77%	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	13 · Table S2 · Table S2
Jsc HTM-FJU-17 reverse scan	25.09 mA/cm2	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	13 · Table S2 · Table S2
PCE HTM-FJU-17 reverse scanMarked as a best value within this paper	20.34%	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	13 · Table S2 · Table S2
Voc HTM-FJU-17 reverse scan	1.05 V	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	13 · Table S2 · Table S2
FF pristine HTM forward scan	58%	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	13 · Table S2 · Table S2
Jsc pristine HTM forward scan	24.20 mA/cm2	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	13 · Table S2 · Table S2
PCE pristine HTM forward scan	12.74%	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	13 · Table S2 · Table S2
Voc pristine HTM forward scan	0.91 V	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	13 · Table S2 · Table S2
FF pristine HTM reverse scan	73%	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	13 · Table S2 · Table S2
Jsc pristine HTM reverse scan	24.43 mA/cm2	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	13 · Table S2 · Table S2
PCE pristine HTM reverse scanMarked as a best value within this paper	18.32%	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	13 · Table S2 · Table S2
Voc pristine HTM reverse scan	1.02 V	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	13 · Table S2 · Table S2

solar-cell J-V measurement under AM 1.5G illumination

PSC with HTM-FJU-17 DFL · Electrode

100 mW cm-2 illumination, active area 0.09 cm2, PSC with HTM-FJU-17 DFL.

Geometry: FTO/TiO2/CH3NH3PbI3/HTM-FJU-17/Ag
Context: MOF-HTM composite device
Measurement source: 4 · 3. Results and discussion · Table 1

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
fill factorMarked as a best value within this paper	77%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	4 · Table 1 · Table 1
JscMarked as a best value within this paper	25.09 mA cm-2	—	—	Table Exact Reported	4 · Table 1 · Table 1
average PCEMarked as a best value within this paper	19.50%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	4 · Table 1 · Table 1
maximum PCEMarked as a best value within this paper	20.34%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	4 · Table 1 · Table 1
VocMarked as a best value within this paper	1.05 V	—	—	Table Exact Reported	4 · Table 1 · Table 1

solar-cell J-V measurement under AM 1.5G illumination

PSC with pristine HTM · Electrode

100 mW cm-2 illumination, active area 0.09 cm2, PSC with pristine HTM.

Geometry: FTO/TiO2/CH3NH3PbI3/HTM/Ag
Context: pristine HTM control
Measurement source: 2 · 2.1. Materials and methods

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
fill factor	73%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	4 · Table 1 · Table 1
Jsc	24.43 mA cm-2	—	—	Table Exact Reported	4 · Table 1 · Table 1
average PCE	17.77%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	4 · Table 1 · Table 1
maximum PCE	18.32%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	4 · Table 1 · Table 1
Voc	1.02 V	—	—	Table Exact Reported	4 · Table 1 · Table 1

maximum power point tracking

PSC with HTM-FJU-17 DFL · Electrode

Continuous one Sun illumination for 1 h at room temperature in nitrogen.

Atmosphere: nitrogen
Geometry: PSC
Context: pristine control versus MOF-HTM composite
Measurement source: 4 · 3. Results and discussion · Fig. 2c

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
normalised PCE retained after 1 h MPP, HTM-FJU-17Marked as a best value within this paper	almost 100%	1 fraction of initial PCE	almost	Text Approximate	4 · 3. Results and discussion · Fig. 2c
normalised PCE retained after 1 h MPP, pristine HTM	~70%	0.7 fraction of initial PCE	~	Text Approximate	4 · 3. Results and discussion · Fig. 2c

maximum power point tracking

PSC with HTM-FJU-17 DFL · Electrode

MPP tracking under nitrogen environment at room temperature for 50 h.

Atmosphere: nitrogen
Geometry: PSC
Context: pristine control versus MOF-HTM composite
Measurement source: Figure S15 note · Fig. S15e

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
normalised PCE retained after 50 h MPP, HTM-FJU-17Marked as a best value within this paper	~55%	0.55 fraction of initial PCE	~	Text Approximate	Figure S15 note · Fig. S15e
normalised PCE retained after 7 h MPP, pristine HTM	~30%	0.3 fraction of initial PCE	~	Text Approximate	Figure S15 note · Fig. S15e

thermal stability storage

PSC with HTM-FJU-17 DFL · Electrode

Stored at 55 degC in N2 for 170 h.

Temperature: 328
Atmosphere: N2
Geometry: PSC
Context: pristine control versus MOF-HTM composite
Measurement source: Figure S15 note · Fig. S15a-d

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
normalised PCE retained after 170 h thermal storage, HTM-FJU-17Marked as a best value within this paper	63%	0.63 fraction of initial PCE	—	Text Rounded Reported	Figure S15 note · Fig. S15a-d
normalised PCE retained after 170 h thermal storage, pristine HTM	17%	0.17 fraction of initial PCE	only	Text Approximate	Figure S15 note · Fig. S15a-d