water contact angle
HTM-FJU-17 DFL film · Thin Film
Pristine HTM and HTM-FJU-17 films compared.
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| water contact angle HTM-FJU-17 left-side fitMarked as a best value within this paper | 88.6 deg | — | — | Visual Estimate Approximate | 7 · Figure S9 · Fig. S9b |
| water contact angle HTM-FJU-17 right-side fitMarked as a best value within this paper | 88.0 deg | — | — | Visual Estimate Approximate | 7 · Figure S9 · Fig. S9b |
| water contact angle pristine HTM left-side fit | 76.7 deg | — | — | Visual Estimate Approximate | 7 · Figure S9 · Fig. S9a |
| water contact angle pristine HTM right-side fit | 76.3 deg | — | — | Visual Estimate Approximate | 7 · Figure S9 · Fig. S9a |
| relative water contact angleMarked as a best value within this paper | HTM-FJU-17 film is larger than pristine HTM | — | — | Text Qualitative | 4 · 3. Results and discussion · Fig. S9a,b |