UV-vis TMB oxidation kinetics and Michaelis-Menten/Lineweaver-Burk analysis
MdP nanoparticles · Powder
Oxidase-like catalytic oxidation of TMB by MdP without H2O2; absorbance at 650 nm tracked versus MdP concentration, TMB concentration and time.
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lineweaver-Burk fitted slope | Y=0.0570X+0.289; R2=0.975 | — | R2=0.975 | Figure Axis Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Catalytic performance · Fig. 4F |
| Absorbance versus MdP concentration regression at 1800 s | Y=0.1013X+0.0506; R2=0.9963 | — | R2=0.9963 | Figure Axis Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Catalytic performance · Fig. 4B |
| Absorbance versus MdP concentration regression at 600 s | Y=0.0548X-0.0108; R2=0.9980 | — | R2=0.9980 | Figure Axis Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Catalytic performance · Fig. 4B |
| Michaelis constant Km for MdP-catalysed TMB oxidation | 0.20 mM | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 6 · 3.3 Catalytic performance · Fig. 4E-F |
| Michaelis-Menten Vmax for MdP-catalysed TMB oxidation | 3.43 x 10-8 M s-1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 6 · 3.3 Catalytic performance · Fig. 4E-F |
| Optimum pH for MdP catalytic TMB oxidation | pH 4.2 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 6-7 · 3.3 Catalytic performance · Fig. S10A |
| Temperature range where TMB absorbance nearly constant | 20-25 C | — | range | Text Range | 7 · 3.3 Catalytic performance · Fig. S10B |
| Absorbance versus TMB concentration regression at 1800 s | Y=2.048X+0.03514; R2=0.9851 | — | R2=0.9851 | Figure Axis Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Catalytic performance · Fig. 4D |
| Absorbance versus TMB concentration regression at 600 s | Y=0.8953X+0.2201; R2=0.9857 | — | R2=0.9857 | Figure Axis Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Catalytic performance · Fig. 4D |