Sensing Application — Construction of nanozyme based with mixed valence manganese oxide loaded on defective metal-organic frameworks for sensitive detection of biomarker procalcitonin

Measurement evidence

Sensing Application

Construction of nanozyme based with mixed valence manganese oxide loaded on defective metal-organic frameworks for sensitive detection of biomarker procalcitonin · Deng S., Hao Y., Yang L. et al. · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · 2025 · 117339

4 measurement groups · 100 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

Bland-Altman statistical analysis for MdPM sensor versus commercial method

MdPM magnetic immunosensor assay complex · Unknown

Statistical comparison of MdPM sensor and commercial method for clinical PCT sample results.

Geometry
statistical comparison of serum assay results
Context
application validation of Ab2-MdP composite nanozyme sensor
Measurement source
17 · Figures and Tables · Table S7
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
95% CI difference upper boundMarked as a best value within this paper1.217 ng mL-1SI Table
Exact Reported
17 · Figures and Tables · Table S7
95% CI difference lower boundMarked as a best value within this paper-0.675 ng mL-1SI Table
Exact Reported
17 · Figures and Tables · Table S7
95% CI mean difference upper bound0.550 ng mL-1SI Table
Exact Reported
17 · Figures and Tables · Table S7
95% CI mean difference lower bound-0.007 ng mL-1SI Table
Exact Reported
17 · Figures and Tables · Table S7
Coefficient of repeatability1.055 ng mL-1SI Table
Exact Reported
17 · Figures and Tables · Table S7
Effective sample size14SI Table
Exact Reported
17 · Figures and Tables · Table S7
Mean differenceMarked as a best value within this paper0.271 ng mL-1SI Table
Exact Reported
17 · Figures and Tables · Table S7
Mean Method 1 MdPM sensor4.396 ng mL-1SI Table
Exact Reported
17 · Figures and Tables · Table S7
Mean Method 2 commercial method4.125 ng mL-1SI Table
Exact Reported
17 · Figures and Tables · Table S7
p-value for H0 mean difference = 0Marked as a best value within this paper0.056SI Table
Exact Reported
17 · Figures and Tables · Table S7
Standard deviation of difference0.483 ng mL-1SI Table
Exact Reported
17 · Figures and Tables · Table S7
t-value for H0 mean difference = 02.102SI Table
Exact Reported
17 · Figures and Tables · Table S7

clinical serum PCT comparison by MdPM sensor and hospital fluorescence immunochromatography

MdPM magnetic immunosensor assay complex · Unknown

Fifteen clinical human serum samples measured in triplicate by MdPM sensor and compared with hospital-provided reference values.

Geometry
solution-phase magnetic immunoassay versus commercial fluorescence immunochromatography
Context
application of Ab2-MdP composite nanozyme
Measurement source
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Clinical classification agreement for sample 10MdPM +; hospital +SI Table
Qualitative
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
Hospital reference PCT for clinical sample 101.33 ng mL-1SI Table
Exact Reported
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
MdPM average PCT for clinical sample 101.47 ng mL-1SI Table
Exact Reported
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
MdPM RSD for clinical sample 100.889%SI Table
Exact Reported
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
Clinical classification agreement for sample 11MdPM -; hospital -SI Table
Qualitative
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
Hospital reference PCT for clinical sample 110.300 ng mL-1SI Table
Exact Reported
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
MdPM average PCT for clinical sample 110.290 ng mL-1SI Table
Exact Reported
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
MdPM RSD for clinical sample 111.42%SI Table
Exact Reported
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
Clinical classification agreement for sample 12MdPM +; hospital +SI Table
Qualitative
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
Hospital reference PCT for clinical sample 120.850 ng mL-1SI Table
Exact Reported
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
MdPM average PCT for clinical sample 120.870 ng mL-1SI Table
Exact Reported
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
MdPM RSD for clinical sample 120.456%SI Table
Exact Reported
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
Clinical classification agreement for sample 13MdPM +; hospital +SI Table
Qualitative
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
Hospital reference PCT for clinical sample 131.27 ng mL-1SI Table
Exact Reported
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
MdPM average PCT for clinical sample 131.29 ng mL-1SI Table
Exact Reported
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
MdPM RSD for clinical sample 130.889%SI Table
Exact Reported
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
Clinical classification agreement for sample 14MdPM +; hospital +SI Table
Qualitative
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
Hospital reference PCT for clinical sample 147.51 ng mL-1SI Table
Exact Reported
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
MdPM average PCT for clinical sample 148.22 ng mL-1SI Table
Exact Reported
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
MdPM RSD for clinical sample 140.335%SI Table
Exact Reported
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
Clinical classification agreement for sample 15MdPM +; hospital +SI Table
Qualitative
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
Hospital reference PCT for clinical sample 156.65 ng mL-1SI Table
Exact Reported
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
MdPM average PCT for clinical sample 156.83 ng mL-1SI Table
Exact Reported
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
MdPM RSD for clinical sample 150.761%SI Table
Exact Reported
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
Clinical classification agreement for sample 1MdPM -; hospital -SI Table
Qualitative
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
Hospital reference PCT for clinical sample 1<0.1 ng mL-1SI Table
Qualitative
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
MdPM PCT result for sample 1<0.01 ng mL-1 in all three replicates; average not reportedSI Table
Qualitative
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
Clinical classification agreement for sample 2MdPM -; hospital -SI Table
Qualitative
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
Hospital reference PCT for clinical sample 20.180 ng mL-1SI Table
Exact Reported
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
MdPM average PCT for clinical sample 20.165 ng mL-1SI Table
Exact Reported
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
MdPM RSD for clinical sample 26.3%SI Table
Exact Reported
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
Clinical classification agreement for sample 3MdPM -; hospital -SI Table
Qualitative
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
Hospital reference PCT for clinical sample 30.320 ng mL-1SI Table
Exact Reported
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
MdPM average PCT for clinical sample 30.340 ng mL-1SI Table
Exact Reported
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
MdPM RSD for clinical sample 34.36%SI Table
Exact Reported
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
Clinical classification agreement for sample 4MdPM +; hospital +SI Table
Qualitative
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
Hospital reference PCT for clinical sample 40.550 ng mL-1SI Table
Exact Reported
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
MdPM average PCT for clinical sample 40.637 ng mL-1SI Table
Exact Reported
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
MdPM RSD for clinical sample 40.335%SI Table
Exact Reported
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
Clinical classification agreement for sample 5MdPM -; hospital -SI Table
Qualitative
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
Hospital reference PCT for clinical sample 50.190 ng mL-1SI Table
Exact Reported
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
MdPM average PCT for clinical sample 50.194 ng mL-1SI Table
Exact Reported
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
MdPM RSD for clinical sample 50.335%SI Table
Exact Reported
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
Clinical classification agreement for sample 6MdPM +; hospital +SI Table
Qualitative
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
Hospital reference PCT for clinical sample 62.12 ng mL-1SI Table
Exact Reported
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
MdPM average PCT for clinical sample 62.17 ng mL-1SI Table
Exact Reported
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
MdPM RSD for clinical sample 60.439%SI Table
Exact Reported
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
Clinical classification agreement for sample 7MdPM +; hospital +SI Table
Qualitative
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
Hospital reference PCT for clinical sample 77.76 ng mL-1SI Table
Exact Reported
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
MdPM average PCT for clinical sample 78.71 ng mL-1SI Table
Exact Reported
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
MdPM RSD for clinical sample 70.706%SI Table
Exact Reported
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
Clinical classification agreement for sample 8MdPM +; hospital +SI Table
Qualitative
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
Hospital reference PCT for clinical sample 827.6 ng mL-1SI Table
Exact Reported
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
MdPM average PCT for clinical sample 829.2 ng mL-1SI Table
Exact Reported
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
MdPM RSD for clinical sample 80.828%SI Table
Exact Reported
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
Clinical classification agreement for sample 9MdPM +; hospital +SI Table
Qualitative
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
Hospital reference PCT for clinical sample 91.11 ng mL-1SI Table
Exact Reported
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
MdPM average PCT for clinical sample 91.16 ng mL-1SI Table
Exact Reported
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6
MdPM RSD for clinical sample 90.77%SI Table
Exact Reported
16 · Figures and Tables · Table S6

magnetic sandwich immunosensor with UV-vis absorbance readout at 650 nm

MdPM magnetic immunosensor assay complex · Unknown

Ab1-MBs added to PCT sample, incubated 20 min, Ab2-MdP added 20 min, TMB 0.500 mM added and shaken 30 min; blue supernatant detected.

Geometry
solution-phase magnetic immunoassay
Context
application of Ab2-MdP composite nanozyme
Measurement source
3 and 8 · 2.4; 3.5 Immunosensor performance · Fig. 5
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Bland-Altman 95% CI upper bound1.21795% CIText
Exact Reported
8 · 3.5 Immunosensor performance · Fig. 5F
Bland-Altman 95% CI lower bound-0.67595% CIText
Exact Reported
8 · 3.5 Immunosensor performance · Fig. 5F
Bland-Altman mean difference0.271Text
Exact Reported
8 · 3.5 Immunosensor performance · Fig. 5F
Clinical sample correlation slope versus hospital method0.9412Text
Exact Reported
8 · 3.5 Immunosensor performance · Fig. 5E; Table S7
PCT detection linear rangeMarked as a best value within this paper0.05-100 ng mL-1rangeText
Range
1 and 8 · Abstract; 3.5 Immunosensor performance · Fig. 5B
PCT detection limitMarked as a best value within this paper0.011 ng mL-1Text
Exact Reported
1 and 8 · Abstract; 3.5 Immunosensor performance · Fig. 5B
Maximum PCT serum spike RSD6.37%Text
Exact Reported
8 · 3.5 Immunosensor performance · Table S5
Minimum PCT serum spike RSD0.209%Text
Exact Reported
8 · 3.5 Immunosensor performance · Table S5
PCT calibration regression slopey = 0.105*x+0.477; R2 = 0.992R2 = 0.992Text
Exact Reported
8 · 3.5 Immunosensor performance · Fig. 5B
Maximum PCT serum spike recovery103%Text
Exact Reported
8 · 3.5 Immunosensor performance · Table S5
Minimum PCT serum spike recovery99.7%Text
Exact Reported
8 · 3.5 Immunosensor performance · Table S5

PCT spiking recovery in human serum by MdPM sensor

MdPM magnetic immunosensor assay complex · Unknown

Healthy human serum spiked with 0.500-50.0 ng mL-1 PCT; three parallel samples per spike level.

Geometry
solution-phase magnetic immunoassay
Context
application of Ab2-MdP composite nanozyme
Measurement source
15 · Figures and Tables · Table S5
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Measured PCT at 0.5 ng mL-1 spike0.500 +/- 0.010 ng mL-1+/- 0.01 ng mL-1SI Table
Exact Reported
15 · Figures and Tables · Table S5
PCT recovery at 0.5 ng mL-1 spike100%SI Table
Exact Reported
15 · Figures and Tables · Table S5
PCT recovery RSD at 0.5 ng mL-1 spike2.0%SI Table
Exact Reported
15 · Figures and Tables · Table S5
Measured PCT at 10 ng mL-1 spike9.97 +/- 0.05 ng mL-1+/- 0.05 ng mL-1SI Table
Exact Reported
15 · Figures and Tables · Table S5
PCT recovery at 10 ng mL-1 spikeMarked as a best value within this paper99.7%SI Table
Exact Reported
15 · Figures and Tables · Table S5
PCT recovery RSD at 10 ng mL-1 spikeMarked as a best value within this paper0.209%SI Table
Exact Reported
15 · Figures and Tables · Table S5
Measured PCT at 1 ng mL-1 spike1.02 +/- 0.03 ng mL-1+/- 0.03 ng mL-1SI Table
Exact Reported
15 · Figures and Tables · Table S5
PCT recovery at 1 ng mL-1 spikeMarked as a best value within this paper103%SI Table
Exact Reported
15 · Figures and Tables · Table S5
PCT recovery RSD at 1 ng mL-1 spikeMarked as a best value within this paper6.37%SI Table
Exact Reported
15 · Figures and Tables · Table S5
Measured PCT at 2 ng mL-1 spike2.00 +/- 0.04 ng mL-1+/- 0.04 ng mL-1SI Table
Exact Reported
15 · Figures and Tables · Table S5
PCT recovery at 2 ng mL-1 spike99.8%SI Table
Exact Reported
15 · Figures and Tables · Table S5
PCT recovery RSD at 2 ng mL-1 spike1.9%SI Table
Exact Reported
15 · Figures and Tables · Table S5
Measured PCT at 50 ng mL-1 spike50.1 +/- 0.2 ng mL-1+/- 0.2 ng mL-1SI Table
Exact Reported
15 · Figures and Tables · Table S5
PCT recovery at 50 ng mL-1 spike100%SI Table
Exact Reported
15 · Figures and Tables · Table S5
PCT recovery RSD at 50 ng mL-1 spike0.305%SI Table
Exact Reported
15 · Figures and Tables · Table S5
Measured PCT at 5 ng mL-1 spike5.04 +/- 0.12 ng mL-1+/- 0.12 ng mL-1SI Table
Exact Reported
15 · Figures and Tables · Table S5
PCT recovery at 5 ng mL-1 spike101%SI Table
Exact Reported
15 · Figures and Tables · Table S5
PCT recovery RSD at 5 ng mL-1 spike1.5%SI Table
Exact Reported
15 · Figures and Tables · Table S5