DFT plus Marcus cross relation
DFT molecular redox models · Model
Gaussian 16 Rev. C.02; B3LYP-D3/Def2TZVP; COSMO DMF; RRHO thermal corrections via SHERMO at 298.15 K and 1 atm
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFT-calculated Co(III)/Co(II) redox potential | +0.30 V versus SCE | — | — | Text Rounded Reported | p020 / SI page S20 · 4.2.3 DFT computational details |
| experimental lower bound for cross-exchange rate constant | k >= 10^2 M^-1 s^-1 | — | lower bound | Calculated From Reported Approximate | p018 / SI page S18 · 4.2.1 Determining a lower bound for k using Damkohler numbers |
| Marcus/DFT cross-exchange rate constantMarked as a best value within this paper | k = 6 x 10^7 M^-1 s^-1 | — | approximate calculation | Text Approximate | p019 / SI page S19 · 4.2.2 Marcus theory and DFT calculations |
| cross-exchange rate with reduced collision frequency scenario | k = 6 x 10^4 M^-1 s^-1 | — | alternative scenario | Text Approximate | p019 / SI page S19 · 4.2.2 Marcus theory and DFT calculations |
| internal reorganisation energy for [Co(bpy)3] redox couple | lambda_int = 2.675 eV | — | — | SI Table Exact Reported | p021 / SI page S21 · 4.2.3 DFT computational details · energy table |
| internal reorganisation energy for NDI redox couple | lambda_int = 0.467 eV | — | — | SI Table Exact Reported | p021 / SI page S21 · 4.2.3 DFT computational details · energy table |
| standard potential difference for Marcus cross relation | Delta E0 = 0.8 V | — | — | Text Rounded Reported | p018 / SI page S18 · 4.2.2 Marcus theory and DFT calculations |