Choi J.Y., Park J. · ACS Applied Electronic Materials · 2021 · 4197-4202
Open a family to keep every result attached to its sample, method and conditions.
Paraphrased for this database from the authors’ stated interpretations — never quoted verbatim — and kept separate from reported measurements.
The ligand-treatment strategy also improves conductivity in Cu3(TATHB)2 and Co3(HAB)2, suggesting applicability to related EC-MOFs.
Caveat: Analogue treatment recipes are described by analogy rather than fully enumerated separately; conductivity values are exact main-text reports supported by SI Figure S14.
5 · Results and Discussion · Figures S11-S14 cited · Linked to 5 structured results
Postsynthetic HAB ligand treatment heals defective sites in Cu3(HAB)2, improving crystallinity and raising room-temperature pellet conductivity by about 700-fold.
Caveat: Conductivity is measured on pressed pellets; intermediate reaction-time conductivities rely on figure-axis estimates.
3 · Results and Discussion · Figure 3a · Linked to 9 structured results
BET and pore-width data suggest that larger defect-associated pores are reduced or disappear after HAB treatment, supporting defect healing.
Caveat: Pore-width distribution is discussed from Figure 5 inset; raw adsorption data were not supplied.
4 · Results and Discussion · Figure 5 · Linked to 5 structured results
The optimum Cu3(HAB)2 defect-healing condition used 0.4 equiv HAB precursor and 30 min reaction time, giving the highest crystallinity in the optimisation screen.
Caveat: The SI provides PXRD traces rather than tabulated crystallinity indices for every optimisation condition.
S2-S3 · Optimization of HAB-Treatment · Figures S1-S2 · Linked to 4 structured results
XPS, N/Cu ratio, and zeta-potential evidence indicate that HAB treatment terminates or passivates defect sites with ligand, while largely preserving the Cu oxidation state.
Caveat: XPS evidence is surface-sensitive; Table S2 quantification supports composition changes but does not alone locate ligands at specific defect sites.
4 · Results and Discussion · Figure 4 · Linked to 9 structured results
The Cu3(HAB)2 conductivity increases with treatment time up to 30 min, then falls after longer treatment because excess insulating HAB ligands remain on particles.
Caveat: Intermediate 5, 10, 15, and 60 min conductivity values are visual estimates from Figure 3b; 30 min value is exact from text.
4 · Results and Discussion · Figure 3b; Figure S10 cited · Linked to 6 structured results
Names and aliases are kept exactly within the paper’s own identity model.
| Material | Composition | Structure context | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Co3(HAB)2Browse family: Co₃(HAB)₂ / Co–HAB | Co3(HAB)2Co nodes · hexaaminobenzene (HAB) | 2D · PristineAnalogue EC-MOF selected to vary the metal component relative to Cu3(HAB)2. | 4 · Results and Discussion · Figure 1 |
| Cu3(HAB)2Browse family: Cu₃(HAB)₂ / Cu–HAB | Cu3(HAB)2Cu nodes, square planar geometry · deprotonated hexaaminobenzene (HAB) | 2D · Pristine2D honeycomb-eclipsed conductive MOF; synchrotron PXRD refined against Pawley fit agreed with the reported structure. | 2 · Introduction · Figure 1 |
| Cu3(TATHB)2 | Cu3(TATHB)2Cu nodes · triaminotrihydroxybenzene (TATHB) | 2D · PristineAnalogue EC-MOF selected to vary the ligand component relative to Cu3(HAB)2. | 4 · Results and Discussion · Figure 1 |
Sample form, processing state and composition status define the context for measurements.
| Sample | Form and role | Processing and geometry | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| pristine Co3(HAB)2research_0023__mat__co_hab | Pellet · Pristine Control · Pristine Framework | As-synthesised analogue MOF; pelletised for conductivity. | 5 · Results and Discussion · Figure S14 cited |
| HAB-treated Co3(HAB)2research_0023__mat__co_hab | Pellet · Target Sample · Guest Loaded | Postsynthetically treated with 0.4 equiv corresponding ligand as for Cu3(HAB)2; pelletised for conductivity. | 4 · Results and Discussion |
| HAB-treated Cu3(HAB)2, 10 minresearch_0023__mat__cu_hab | Pellet · Target Sample · Guest Loaded | HAB post-treatment time-series sample; pelletised for four-point-probe conductivity. | 3 · Results and Discussion · Figure 3b |
| HAB-treated Cu3(HAB)2, 15 minresearch_0023__mat__cu_hab | Pellet · Target Sample · Guest Loaded | HAB post-treatment time-series sample; pelletised for four-point-probe conductivity. | 3 · Results and Discussion · Figure 3b |
| HAB-treated Cu3(HAB)2, 30 minresearch_0023__mat__cu_hab | Pellet · Target Sample · Guest Loaded | Postsynthetic treatment with HAB precursor and NH4OH in water for 30 min; dried under vacuum at 60 deg C for 0.5 h; pelletised for conductivity. | 2 · Experimental Section |
| HAB-treated Cu3(HAB)2, 5 minresearch_0023__mat__cu_hab | Pellet · Target Sample · Guest Loaded | HAB post-treatment time-series sample; pelletised for four-point-probe conductivity. | 3 · Results and Discussion · Figure 3b |
| HAB-treated Cu3(HAB)2, 60 minresearch_0023__mat__cu_hab | Pellet · Target Sample · Guest Loaded | HAB post-treatment time-series sample; pelletised for four-point-probe conductivity. | 4 · Results and Discussion · Figure S10 cited |
| pristine Cu3(HAB)2research_0023__mat__cu_hab | Pellet · Pristine Control · Pristine Framework | As-synthesised MOF; pelletised for four-point-probe conductivity. | 3 · Results and Discussion · Figure 3a |
| pristine Cu3(TATHB)2research_0023__mat__cu_tathb | Pellet · Pristine Control · Pristine Framework | As-synthesised analogue MOF; pelletised for conductivity. | 5 · Results and Discussion · Figure S14 cited |
| TATHB-treated Cu3(TATHB)2research_0023__mat__cu_tathb | Pellet · Target Sample · Guest Loaded | Postsynthetically treated with 0.4 equiv corresponding ligand as for Cu3(HAB)2; pelletised for conductivity. | 4 · Results and Discussion |