Measurement evidence
Enhancing Electrical Conductivity of Semiconducting MOFs via Defect Healing · Choi J.Y., Park J. · ACS Applied Electronic Materials · 2021 · 4197-4202
Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.
HAB-treated Cu3(HAB)2, 30 min · Pellet
Comparison of Cu3(HAB)2 and HAB-treated MOF
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FT-IR spectral change after HAB treatment | no notable changes after post-treatment | — | — | Text Qualitative | S6 · Figure S6 |
HAB-treated Cu3(HAB)2, 30 min · Pellet
Samples dispersed in isopropyl alcohol.
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UV-vis-NIR spectral change after treatment | broad absorption band in near IR with no noticeable changes | — | — | Text Qualitative | 3 · Results and Discussion · Figure 2c |
HAB-treated Cu3(HAB)2, 30 min · Pellet
High-resolution N 1s and Cu 2p spectra before and after HAB treatment.
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cu 2p3/2 binding energy for Cu(I and 0) | 933.0 eV | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 4 · Results and Discussion · Figure 4b; Figure S8 cited |
| Cu 2p3/2 binding energy for Cu(II) | 935.1 eV | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 4 · Results and Discussion · Figure 4b; Figure S8 cited |
| N 1s benzoid amine binding energy | 400.0 eV | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 4 · Results and Discussion · Figure 4a |
| new N 1s amino-group binding energy after HAB treatment | 399.4 eV | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 4 · Results and Discussion · Figure 4a |
| N 1s quinoid imine binding energy | 398.4 eV | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 4 · Results and Discussion · Figure 4a |
| atomic N/Cu ratio after 60 min HAB treatment | 6.2:1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 4 · Results and Discussion · Figure S10 cited |
| atomic N/Cu ratio before HAB treatment | 3.45:1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 4 · Results and Discussion · Figure S9; Table S2 |
| atomic N/Cu ratio after 30 min HAB treatmentMarked as a best value within this paper | 4.18:1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 4 · Results and Discussion · Figure S9; Table S2 |
HAB-treated Cu3(HAB)2, 30 min · Pellet
Table S2 reports Cu 2p3, N 1s, and C 1s atomic percentages for pristine Cu3(HAB)2 and HAB-treated MOF
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C 1s atomic percentage in pristine Cu3(HAB)2 | 52.96 at % | — | — | SI Table Exact Reported | S9 · Table S2 |
| Cu 2p3 atomic percentage in pristine Cu3(HAB)2 | 10.57 at % | — | — | SI Table Exact Reported | S9 · Table S2 |
| N 1s atomic percentage in pristine Cu3(HAB)2 | 36.47 at % | — | — | SI Table Exact Reported | S9 · Table S2 |
| C 1s atomic percentage in HAB-treated Cu3(HAB)2 | 56.98 at % | — | — | SI Table Exact Reported | S9 · Table S2 |
| Cu 2p3 atomic percentage in HAB-treated Cu3(HAB)2 | 8.30 at % | — | — | SI Table Exact Reported | S9 · Table S2 |
| N 1s atomic percentage in HAB-treated Cu3(HAB)2 | 34.72 at % | — | — | SI Table Exact Reported | S9 · Table S2 |
HAB-treated Cu3(HAB)2, 30 min · Pellet
Diluted 30 uL of solution containing 5 mg material per 0.5 mL isopropyl alcohol in 1.2 mL isopropyl alcohol.
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| zeta potential change after HAB treatment | approximately -10 mV net negative change | — | approximately | Text Approximate | 4 · Results and Discussion · Figure 4c |