Spectroscopy — Charge Transfer-Induced Molecular Hole Doping into Thin Film of Metal-Organic Frameworks

Measurement evidence

Spectroscopy

Charge Transfer-Induced Molecular Hole Doping into Thin Film of Metal-Organic Frameworks · Lee D.Y., Kim E.-K., Shrestha N.K. et al. · ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces · 2015 · 18501-18507

5 measurement groups · 20 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

Energy-dispersive X-ray analysis

Iodine-doped Co3(NDC)3 LbL film on glass · Thin Film

EDX atomic percentages for undoped and iodine-doped DB and LbL Co3(NDC)3 films.

Geometry
MOF thin films
Context
Pristine and iodine-doped films
Measurement source
S6 · Figure S1 · Figure S1
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
DB iodine-doped I atomic percentI K 4.18 atomic %4.18 atomic %Figure Axis
Exact Reported
S6 · Figure S1 · Figure S1C
DB undoped C atomic percentC K 68.60 atomic %68.6 atomic %Figure Axis
Exact Reported
S6 · Figure S1 · Figure S1A
DB undoped Co atomic percentCo K 14.94 atomic %14.94 atomic %Figure Axis
Exact Reported
S6 · Figure S1 · Figure S1A
DB undoped O atomic percentO K 16.46 atomic %16.46 atomic %Figure Axis
Exact Reported
S6 · Figure S1 · Figure S1A
LbL iodine-doped I atomic percentMarked as a best value within this paperI K 6.27 atomic %6.27 atomic %Figure Axis
Exact Reported
S6 · Figure S1 · Figure S1D
LbL undoped C atomic percentC K 70.21 atomic %70.21 atomic %Figure Axis
Exact Reported
S6 · Figure S1 · Figure S1B
LbL undoped Co atomic percentCo K 14.56 atomic %14.56 atomic %Figure Axis
Exact Reported
S6 · Figure S1 · Figure S1B
LbL undoped O atomic percentO K 15.23 atomic %15.23 atomic %Figure Axis
Exact Reported
S6 · Figure S1 · Figure S1B

Photoluminescence emission spectroscopy

Iodine-doped Co3(NDC)3 LbL film on ITO · Thin Film

Undoped and iodine-doped DB and LbL Co3(NDC)3 films on ITO; Co(II)* emission quenching quantified.

Geometry
Thin MOF films on ITO
Context
Doped films compared with pristine ITO-supported controls
Measurement source
18505 · Results and Discussion · Figure 6
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Conductivity enhancement versus iodineconductivity of Co3(NDC)3 films after iodine doping is higher by a factor of 10^3 than iodinefactor ofText
Approximate
18505 · Results and Discussion
Co(II)* emission quenching for iodine-doped DB film on ITO95.1% quenchingText
Exact Reported
18505 · Results and Discussion · Figure 6
Co(II)* emission quenching for iodine-doped LbL film on ITOMarked as a best value within this paper97.4% quenchingText
Exact Reported
18505 · Results and Discussion · Figure 6
Co(II)* PL emission maximumapproximately 570 nmvisual estimate from Figure 6/S9Figure Axis
Approximate
18505 · Results and Discussion · Figure 6

UV-visible absorption spectroscopy of chloroform suspensions

Iodine plus naphthalene dicarboxylic acid model · Model

I2, undoped Co3(NDC)3, iodine-doped Co3(NDC)3, and iodine/NDC saturated suspensions in chloroform.

Geometry
Chloroform suspensions
Context
Iodine-doped MOF and molecular model charge-transfer evidence
Measurement source
18504 · Results and Discussion · Figure 4
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Charge-transfer complex deep-UV peakabout 241.5 nmaboutText
Approximate
18503 · Results and Discussion · Figure 4
Iodine characteristic suspension peakabout 512.8 nmaboutText
Approximate
18503 · Results and Discussion · Figure 4

UV-visible absorption spectroscopy

Iodine-doped Co3(NDC)3 LbL film on glass · Thin Film

Co3(NDC)3 LbL and DB films before and after iodine doping; iodine/acetonitrile solution comparison in SI.

Geometry
Thin films on glass slides
Context
Pristine film compared with iodine-doped target film
Measurement source
18502-18503 · Results and Discussion · Figure 3A; Figure S2
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Co3(NDC)3 d-d absorption peakabout 548 nmaboutText
Approximate
18502 · Results and Discussion · Figure 3A; Figure S2A
Iodine-doped film new absorption peakabout 438 nmaboutText
Approximate
18502 · Results and Discussion · Figure 3A; Figure S2B

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

Iodine-doped Co3(NDC)3 LbL film on glass · Thin Film

Survey, I 3d, Co 2p, and C 1s spectra for Co3(NDC)3 frameworks with and without I2 doping.

Geometry
Thin films/frameworks
Context
Iodine-doped target compared with pristine framework
Measurement source
S8 · Figure S3 · Figure S3
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Iodine-doped C 1s new peaknew C 1s peak at 285.5 eVText
Exact Reported
18503 · Results and Discussion · Figure S3D
Iodine loading per Co3(NDC)3 unit cellMarked as a best value within this paper0.35 molecules of iodine accommodated into 1 unit cellText
Rounded Reported
18502 · Results and Discussion · Figure S3A
I3- XPS detectionI3- detected in iodine-doped frameworksText
Qualitative
18503 · Results and Discussion · Figure S3B
Co 2p binding-energy shift after iodine dopingno shift in Co 2p binding-energy positions0 eVqualitative no shiftText
Qualitative
18503 · Results and Discussion · Figure S3C