Electrochemistry Application — Triggering Anodic Luminol Electrochemiluminescence through Electrostatic Interactions: An Innovative Approach Utilizing Conductive Metal-Organic Framework Co-HHTP

10 measurement groups · 26 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

cyclic voltammetry

Voltammetry

Co-HHTP-modified glassy carbon electrode · Electrode

Three-electrode system in 0.04 M B-R buffer with catalyst-modified GCE; comparison of HHTP, Ni-HHTP and Co-HHTP under air-saturated conditions.

Atmosphere: air-saturated solution for comparison in Figure 3C
Geometry: 5 mm glassy carbon working electrode
Context: pristine MOF catalyst on electrode compared with HHTP control
Measurement source: 4-5 · 3.2 ECL Performance · Figure 3C

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
Co-HHTP reduction/oxidation current relative rankingMarked as a best value within this paper	reduction and oxidation currents on Co-HHTP exceeded those on Ni-HHTP and HHTP	—	—	Text Qualitative	5 · 3.2 ECL Performance · Figure 3C

ECL-potential profiles in N2 and air

Co-HHTP-modified glassy carbon electrode · Electrode

Co-HHTP electrode in N2-saturated and air-saturated B-R/luminol solutions.

Atmosphere: N2-saturated versus air-saturated
Geometry: Co-HHTP-modified glassy carbon working electrode
Context: pristine Co-HHTP catalyst on electrode
Measurement source: 3,5 · 3.2 ECL Performance · Figure 2C

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
Peak ECL intensity in air-saturated solutionMarked as a best value within this paper	~12000 a.u.	—	visual estimate +/-1000 a.u.	Figure Axis Approximate	3 · Figure 2 · Figure 2C
ECL response in N2-saturated solution	no discernible ECL signal	—	—	Text Qualitative	5 · 3.2 ECL Performance · Figure 2C

ECL-potential profiles versus initial potential

Co-HHTP-modified glassy carbon electrode · Electrode

Co-HHTP ECL profiles at initial potentials -0.1, -0.3, -0.5, and -0.7 V to 1.0 V.

Atmosphere: dissolved oxygen/air context
Geometry: Co-HHTP-modified glassy carbon working electrode
Context: pristine Co-HHTP catalyst on electrode
Measurement source: 3,5 · 3.2 ECL Performance · Figure 2D

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
Peak ECL intensity at -0.5 V initial potentialMarked as a best value within this paper	~12000 a.u.	—	visual estimate +/-1000 a.u.	Figure Axis Approximate	3 · Figure 2 · Figure 2D
Peak ECL intensity at -0.7 V initial potential	~5800 a.u.	—	visual estimate +/-800 a.u.	Figure Axis Approximate	3 · Figure 2 · Figure 2D
Optimal initial potentialMarked as a best value within this paper	-0.5 V	—	—	Text Exact Reported	5 · 3.2 ECL Performance · Figure 2D; Figure S2 cited

ECL-potential profile material comparison

Co-HHTP-modified glassy carbon electrode · Electrode

HHTP-, Ni-HHTP-, and Co-HHTP-modified electrodes in luminol/dissolved oxygen ECL system.

Atmosphere: air/dissolved oxygen
Geometry: drop-cast catalyst film on glassy carbon electrode
Context: pristine Co-HHTP compared with pristine Ni-HHTP and HHTP control
Measurement source: 1,4-5 · Abstract; 3.2 ECL Performance · Figure 3A

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
Co-HHTP peak ECL intensityMarked as a best value within this paper	~12000 a.u.	—	visual estimate +/-1000 a.u.	Figure Axis Approximate	4 · Figure 3 · Figure 3A
Co-HHTP ECL intensity versus HHTPMarked as a best value within this paper	approximately 8 times	—	—	Text Rounded Reported	1 · Abstract
Co-HHTP ECL intensity versus Ni-HHTPMarked as a best value within this paper	approximately 1.5 times	—	—	Text Rounded Reported	1 · Abstract
HHTP peak ECL intensity	~1500 a.u.	—	visual estimate +/-500 a.u.	Figure Axis Approximate	4 · Figure 3 · Figure 3A
Ni-HHTP peak ECL intensity	~8000 a.u.	—	visual estimate +/-1000 a.u.	Figure Axis Approximate	4 · Figure 3 · Figure 3A

ECL-potential profiles versus luminol adsorption time

Ni-HHTP-modified glassy carbon electrode · Electrode

Ni-HHTP in 0.02 mM luminol solution with adsorption times 0-3 h.

Geometry: Ni-HHTP-modified glassy carbon electrode
Context: pristine Ni-HHTP comparator electrode exposed to luminol solution
Measurement source: S6 · Supporting Information · Figure S4

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
Ni-HHTP ECL peak after 0 h luminol adsorption	~200 a.u.	—	—	Figure Axis Approximate	S6 · Supporting Information · Figure S4
Ni-HHTP ECL peak after 3 h luminol adsorptionMarked as a best value within this paper	~7200 a.u.	—	—	Figure Axis Approximate	S6 · Supporting Information · Figure S4

luminol electrochemiluminescence potential scans

Co-HHTP-modified glassy carbon electrode · Electrode

0.04 M B-R buffer with 0.02 mM luminol; photomultiplier voltage 600 V; potential windows 0 to -0.5 to 0 V, 0 to 1.0 to 0 V, and -0.5 to 1.0 to -0.5 V.

Atmosphere: air/dissolved oxygen unless otherwise specified
Geometry: Co-HHTP-modified glassy carbon working electrode
Context: pristine Co-HHTP catalyst on electrode in luminol/dissolved oxygen ECL system
Measurement source: 3-5 · 2.4; 3.2 ECL Performance · Figure 2A-B

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
Peak ECL intensity for -0.5 to 1.0 to -0.5 V scanMarked as a best value within this paper	~12000 a.u.	—	visual estimate +/-1000 a.u.	Figure Axis Approximate	3 · Figure 2 · Figure 2A
ECL enhancement by -0.5 to 1.0 V window versus 0 to 1.0 VMarked as a best value within this paper	30 times higher	—	—	Text Rounded Reported	1 · Abstract

ECL transient/intensity comparison of luminol@M-HHTP

luminol@Co-HHTP-modified glassy carbon electrode · Electrode

luminol@Co-HHTP and luminol@Ni-HHTP modified electrodes compared under repeated ECL pulses/scans; exact pulse details not fully specified in main text.

Atmosphere: dissolved oxygen/air context
Geometry: guest-loaded catalyst film on glassy carbon electrode
Context: guest-loaded Co-HHTP compared with guest-loaded Ni-HHTP
Measurement source: 4-5 · 3.2 ECL Performance · Figure 3H

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
luminol@Co-HHTP peak ECL transient intensityMarked as a best value within this paper	~15000 a.u.	—	visual estimate +/-1500 a.u.	Figure Axis Approximate	4 · Figure 3 · Figure 3H
luminol@Ni-HHTP peak ECL transient intensity	~7000 a.u.	—	visual estimate +/-1000 a.u.	Figure Axis Approximate	4 · Figure 3 · Figure 3H

ECL with ROS quenchers

Co-HHTP-modified glassy carbon electrode · Electrode

10 mM isopropanol (IPA, hydroxyl radical quencher) or 10 mM benzoquinone (BQ, superoxide radical quencher) added to Co-HHTP/luminol/dissolved O2 ECL system.

Atmosphere: dissolved O2
Geometry: Co-HHTP-modified GCE
Context: pristine Co-HHTP catalyst on electrode
Measurement source: 6 · 3.3 Possible Enhancement Mechanism · Figure 4C-D

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
Blank ECL intensity without quencherMarked as a best value within this paper	~12000 a.u.	—	visual estimate +/-1000 a.u.	Figure Axis Approximate	6 · Figure 4 · Figure 4D
ECL intensity with 10 mM BQ	~100 a.u.; nearly suppressed	—	visual estimate +/-200 a.u.	Figure Axis Approximate	6 · Figure 4 · Figure 4D
ECL intensity with 10 mM IPA	~5200 a.u.	—	visual estimate +/-700 a.u.	Figure Axis Approximate	6 · Figure 4 · Figure 4D

stepped-pulse ECL transients

Co-HHTP-modified glassy carbon electrode · Electrode

Co-HHTP in luminol/dissolved O2 ECL system; stepped pulses from -0.5 to 1.0 V and from 1.0 to -0.5 V.

Atmosphere: dissolved O2
Geometry: Co-HHTP-modified GCE
Context: pristine Co-HHTP catalyst on electrode
Measurement source: 6 · 3.3 Possible Enhancement Mechanism · Figure 4A-B

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
Stepped-pulse ECL peak after -0.5 to 1.0 V sequenceMarked as a best value within this paper	~11000 a.u.	—	visual estimate +/-1000 a.u.	Figure Axis Approximate	6 · Figure 4 · Figure 4A
Reverse pulse first-cycle ECL emission	no significant ECL emission during first pulse cycle	—	—	Text Qualitative	6 · 3.3 Possible Enhancement Mechanism · Figure 4B

stepped-pulse ECL transient optimisation

Co-HHTP-modified glassy carbon electrode · Electrode

Co-HHTP in luminol/dissolved O2 ECL system; pulses from -0.1, -0.3, -0.5, or -0.7 V to +1.0 V.

Atmosphere: dissolved O2 / air-saturated B-R buffer implied
Geometry: Co-HHTP-modified glassy carbon electrode
Context: pristine Co-HHTP electrode in luminol electrolyte
Measurement source: S4 · Supporting Information · Figure S2

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
Peak ECL for -0.1 to +1.0 V stepped pulse	~1600 a.u.	—	—	Figure Axis Approximate	S4 · Supporting Information · Figure S2A
Peak ECL for -0.3 to +1.0 V stepped pulse	~4200 a.u.	—	—	Figure Axis Approximate	S4 · Supporting Information · Figure S2B
Peak ECL for -0.5 to +1.0 V stepped pulseMarked as a best value within this paper	~11000 a.u.	—	—	Figure Axis Approximate	S4 · Supporting Information · Figure S2C
Peak ECL for -0.7 to +1.0 V stepped pulse	~8000 a.u.	—	—	Figure Axis Approximate	S4 · Supporting Information · Figure S2D