Spectroscopy — Triggering Anodic Luminol Electrochemiluminescence through Electrostatic Interactions: An Innovative Approach Utilizing Conductive Metal-Organic Framework Co-HHTP

Measurement evidence

Spectroscopy

Triggering Anodic Luminol Electrochemiluminescence through Electrostatic Interactions: An Innovative Approach Utilizing Conductive Metal-Organic Framework Co-HHTP · Liu M., Wei J., Lin S.-J. et al. · ACS Applied Electronic Materials · 2024 · 2375-2382

7 measurement groups · 27 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

FTIR spectroscopy

Co-HHTP powder · Powder

Spectrum GX FTIR spectroscopy system; conditions otherwise not reported.

Geometry
powder spectroscopy
Context
pristine Co-HHTP powder
Measurement source
4 · 3.1 Physical Characterization · Figure 1F
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
FTIR adsorbed-water vibration1627 cm-1Text
Exact Reported
4 · 3.1 Physical Characterization · Figure 1F
FTIR Co-O bond peak685 cm-1Text
Exact Reported
4 · 3.1 Physical Characterization · Figure 1F
FTIR O-H stretch3372 cm-1Text
Exact Reported
4 · 3.1 Physical Characterization · Figure 1F

FTIR spectroscopy

Ni-HHTP powder · Powder

Ni-HHTP powder; SI Figure S1B.

Context
pristine Ni-HHTP conductive-MOF control
Measurement source
S3 · Supporting Information · Figure S1B
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Ni-HHTP FTIR spectrumFT-IR spectrum recorded for Ni-HHTPCaption
Qualitative
S3 · Supporting Information · Figure S1B

photoluminescence/fluorescence spectroscopy of luminol after adsorption on Co-HHTP

Co-HHTP powder · Powder

Luminol fluorescence monitored versus adsorption time on Co-HHTP.

Atmosphere
solution, not specified
Geometry
solution fluorescence after powder adsorption
Context
pristine Co-HHTP as host for luminol adsorption
Measurement source
4-5 · 3.2 ECL Performance · Figure 3G
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Luminol fluorescence after 12 h adsorption on Co-HHTPMarked as a best value within this paperalmost imperceptibleText
Qualitative
5 · 3.2 ECL Performance · Figure 3G
luminol@Co-HHTP UV-vis luminol peak218 nmText
Exact Reported
5 · 3.2 ECL Performance · Figure S8 cited
luminol@Co-HHTP UV-vis luminol peak295 nmText
Exact Reported
5 · 3.2 ECL Performance · Figure S8 cited
luminol@Co-HHTP UV-vis luminol peak357 nmText
Exact Reported
5 · 3.2 ECL Performance · Figure S8 cited
Luminol molecular diameter~0.88 nmText
Approximate
5 · 3.2 ECL Performance · Figure S6 cited

UV-vis absorption spectroscopy

luminol@Co-HHTP powder · Powder

UV-vis patterns for luminol, luminol@Co-HHTP, Co-HHTP, luminol@Ni-HHTP and Ni-HHTP.

Context
guest-loaded framework confirmation
Measurement source
S10 · Supporting Information · Figure S8
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
luminol@Ni-HHTP UV-vis luminol peak220 nmFigure Axis
Rounded Reported
S10 · Supporting Information · Figure S8B
luminol@Ni-HHTP UV-vis luminol peak295 nmFigure Axis
Rounded Reported
S10 · Supporting Information · Figure S8B
luminol@Ni-HHTP UV-vis luminol peak360 nmFigure Axis
Rounded Reported
S10 · Supporting Information · Figure S8B

XPS

Co-HHTP powder · Powder

Thermo Scientific K-Alpha with monochromatic Al Kalpha under vacuum; C 1s corrected to 284.8 eV.

Atmosphere
vacuum
Geometry
powder XPS
Context
pristine Co-HHTP powder
Measurement source
3-4 · 2.3 Characterization; 3.1 Physical Characterization · Figure 1G-J
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
C 1s C=O binding energy288.50 eVText
Exact Reported
4 · 3.1 Physical Characterization · Figure 1J
C 1s C-C/C=C binding energy284.70 eVText
Exact Reported
4 · 3.1 Physical Characterization · Figure 1J
C 1s C-O binding energy286.20 eVText
Exact Reported
4 · 3.1 Physical Characterization · Figure 1J
Co 2p1/2 XPS binding energy797.32 eVText
Exact Reported
4 · 3.1 Physical Characterization · Figure 1H
Co 2p3/2 XPS binding energy781.46 eVText
Exact Reported
4 · 3.1 Physical Characterization · Figure 1H
Co 2p satellite binding energy785.40 eVText
Exact Reported
4 · 3.1 Physical Characterization · Figure 1H
Co 2p satellite binding energy802.30 eVText
Exact Reported
4 · 3.1 Physical Characterization · Figure 1H
O 1s C-O binding energy533.2 eVText
Exact Reported
4 · 3.1 Physical Characterization · Figure 1I
O 1s Co-O binding energy531.70 eVText
Exact Reported
4 · 3.1 Physical Characterization · Figure 1I
O 1s adsorbed-water binding energy535 eVText
Rounded Reported
4 · 3.1 Physical Characterization · Figure 1I

XPS survey and Co 2p high-resolution spectra

luminol@Co-HHTP powder · Powder

Luminol@Co-HHTP compared with Co-HHTP.

Atmosphere
vacuum
Context
guest-loaded Co-HHTP construct
Measurement source
S11 · Supporting Information · Figure S9A-B
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
luminol@Co-HHTP XPS survey elementsCo, O, C and N elements presentText
Qualitative
5 · 3.2 ECL Performance · Figure S9A,B
Co 2p1/2 binding-energy shift after luminol loadingnegative shift about 0.22 eVFigure Axis
Approximate
S11 · Supporting Information · Figure S9B
Co 2p3/2 binding-energy shift after luminol loadingnegative shift about 0.18 eVFigure Axis
Approximate
S11 · Supporting Information · Figure S9B

Ni 2p XPS

luminol@Ni-HHTP powder · Powder

Luminol@Ni-HHTP compared with Ni-HHTP.

Atmosphere
vacuum
Context
guest-loaded Ni-HHTP comparator
Measurement source
S11 · Supporting Information · Figure S9C
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Ni 2p1/2 binding-energy shift after luminol loadingnegative shift about 0.42 eVFigure Axis
Approximate
S11 · Supporting Information · Figure S9C
Ni 2p3/2 binding-energy shift after luminol loadingnegative shift about 0.10 eVFigure Axis
Approximate
S11 · Supporting Information · Figure S9C