UPS and UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy with Tauc analysis
Ni SAs@UiO-66-NH2(Hf) powder · Powder
Electronic-state, work-function, valence-band and bandgap comparison of UiO-66, UiO-66-NH2 and Ni SAs@UiO-66-NH2.
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Optical bandgap of Ni SAs@UiO-66-NH2Marked as a best value within this paper | 2.12 eV | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 8 · Experimental Insights into Electronic States and Polarization · Figure 4d |
| Optical bandgap of UiO-66 | 3.25 eV | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 8 · Experimental Insights into Electronic States and Polarization · Figure 4d |
| Optical bandgap of UiO-66-NH2 | 2.44 eV | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 8 · Experimental Insights into Electronic States and Polarization · Figure 4d |
| Valence band maximum of Ni SAs@UiO-66-NH2 vs Fermi level | 0.86 eV vs EF | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 8 · Experimental Insights into Electronic States and Polarization · Figure 4a |
| Valence band maximum of UiO-66 vs Fermi level | 0.75 eV vs EF | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 8 · Experimental Insights into Electronic States and Polarization · Figure 4a |
| Valence band maximum of UiO-66-NH2 vs Fermi level | 0.46 eV vs EF | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 8 · Experimental Insights into Electronic States and Polarization · Figure 4a |
| Work function of Ni SAs@UiO-66-NH2Marked as a best value within this paper | 3.92 eV | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 8 · Experimental Insights into Electronic States and Polarization · Figure 4b,c |
| Work function of UiO-66 | 2.56 eV | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 8 · Experimental Insights into Electronic States and Polarization · Figure 4b,c |
| Work function of UiO-66-NH2 | 3.26 eV | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 8 · Experimental Insights into Electronic States and Polarization · Figure 4b,c |