Computational Modelling — Electrically Conductive Metal–Organic Framework Thin Film-Based On-Chip Micro-Biosensor: A Platform to Unravel Surface Morphology-Dependent Biosensing

Measurement evidence

Computational Modelling

Electrically Conductive Metal–Organic Framework Thin Film-Based On-Chip Micro-Biosensor: A Platform to Unravel Surface Morphology-Dependent Biosensing · Chen X., Dong J., Chi K. et al. · Advanced Functional Materials · 2021 · 2102855

2 measurement groups · 12 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

DFT band structure and projected density of states

Cu3C6S6 DFT slab with s-Cu/ts-Cu/S/C adsorption sites · Model

Calculated band structure and projected density of states for Cu-BHT; equilibrium triclinic unit cell optimized with 3 x 3 x 9 Monkhorst-Pack k-point grid.

Geometry
periodic Cu3C6S6 model
Context
model system
Measurement source
p003 · Results and Discussion · Figure 2c
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Calculated electronic structure characterband structure overlaps Fermi level; pseudogap around Fermi level; metallic-like characterText
Qualitative
p003 · Results and Discussion · Figure 2c
DFT-optimised triclinic unit cell aa = 8.749 AText
Exact Reported
p008 · Experimental Section - Computational Method
DFT-optimised triclinic unit cell bb = 8.731 AText
Exact Reported
p008 · Experimental Section - Computational Method
DFT-optimised third lattice constant printed as aa = 3.432 A (likely c)Text
Exact Reported
p008 · Experimental Section - Computational Method

DFT H2O2 adsorption and reaction free-energy calculations

Cu3C6S6 DFT slab with s-Cu/ts-Cu/S/C adsorption sites · Model

H2O2 adsorption energies calculated for ts-Cu, s-Cu, S, and C sites; reaction energies for H2O2* + e- -> OH* + OH- compared across sites.

Geometry
Cu3C6S6 (001) slab with open-edge model
Context
model system
Measurement source
p006 · Results and Discussion · Figure 5c-d / Figure S22
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
H2O2 adsorption energy on C-0.35 eVText
Exact Reported
p006 · Results and Discussion · Figure 5c
H2O2 adsorption energy on S-0.37 eVText
Exact Reported
p006 · Results and Discussion · Figure 5c
H2O2 adsorption energy on s-Cu-0.4 eVText
Rounded Reported
p006 · Results and Discussion · Figure 5c
H2O2 adsorption energy on ts-CuMarked as a best value within this paper-2.7 eVText
Rounded Reported
p006 · Results and Discussion · Figure 5c
Reaction energy for H2O2* + e- -> OH* + OH- at C-1.92 eVText
Exact Reported
p006 · Results and Discussion · Figure 5d
Reaction energy for H2O2* + e- -> OH* + OH- at S-1.99 eVText
Exact Reported
p006 · Results and Discussion · Figure 5d
Reaction energy for H2O2* + e- -> OH* + OH- at s-Cu-1.67 eVText
Exact Reported
p006 · Results and Discussion · Figure 5d
Reaction energy for H2O2* + e- -> OH* + OH- at ts-CuMarked as a best value within this paper-2.7 eVText
Rounded Reported
p006 · Results and Discussion · Figure 5d