AFM tapping mode and SEM
Pristine Cu-BHT thin film · Thin Film
AFM images of up-side and bottom-side surfaces; SEM images in SI corroborate surface morphology.
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bottom-side interfacial areaMarked as a best value within this paper | 25.26 um2 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | p003 · Results and Discussion · Figure 1 |
| Bottom-side film height | 17.42 nm | — | — | Text Exact Reported | p003 · Results and Discussion · Figure 2b |
| Bottom-side surface roughness rqMarked as a best value within this paper | rq = 8.6 nm | — | — | Text Rounded Reported | p003 · Results and Discussion · Figure 1h |
| Controlled Cu-BHT film thickness | approx 17 nm; conclusion says 16-nm-thick | — | RSD 3.9% for six films | Text Approximate | p003 · Results and Discussion · Figure S6 |
| Thickness reproducibility RSD | RSD = 3.9% | — | — | Text Exact Reported | p003 · Results and Discussion · Figure S6 |
| Up-side interfacial area | 25.04 um2 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | p003 · Results and Discussion · Figure 1 |
| Up-side film height | 16.79 nm | — | — | Text Exact Reported | p003 · Results and Discussion · Figure 2b |
| Up-side surface roughness rq | rq = 0.9 nm | — | — | Text Rounded Reported | p002-p003 · Results and Discussion · Figure 1e |