Electrical Transport — Fe–O–Zr in MOF for effective photo-Fenton Bisphenol A degradation: Boosting mechanism of electronic transmission

Measurement evidence

Electrical Transport

Fe–O–Zr in MOF for effective photo-Fenton Bisphenol A degradation: Boosting mechanism of electronic transmission · Guan Z., Zhu S., Ding S. et al. · Chemosphere · 2022 · 134481

1 measurement group · 5 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

Cyclic voltammetry, chronoamperometric I-t response and linear sweep voltammetry

Voltammetry Chronoamperometry

FeUiO-1 powder/FTO electrochemical electrode · Electrode

CV of UiO-66 and FeUiO-1; I-t curves at 0 V vs Ag/AgCl in 0.5 M Na2SO4 with H2O2 and BPA additions; LSV from 0.0-1.5 V vs Ag/AgCl at 50 mV/s.

Geometry: FTO drop-cast powder/Nafion electrode; Ag/AgCl reference and Pt counter electrode
Context: FeUiO-1 compared with UiO-66.
Measurement source: 10 · 3.5 Possible degradation mechanism · Fig. 8a-c

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
FeUiO-1 Faradaic current and charge storageMarked as a best value within this paper	FeUiO-1 had a higher Faraday current and a higher ability to store charge than UiO-66	—	—	Text Qualitative	10 · 3.5 Possible degradation mechanism · Fig. 8a
EIS frequency range	10^5 to 10^-1 Hz	—	—	Text Range	Text S4 Electrochemical analysis tests
LSV scan rate	50 mV/s	—	—	Text Exact Reported	Text S4 Electrochemical analysis tests
I-t current response after contaminant additionMarked as a best value within this paper	current change of FeUiO-1 was stronger than UiO-66 after addition of contaminant	—	—	Text Qualitative	10 · 3.5 Possible degradation mechanism · Fig. 8b
LSV overpotential comparison	FeUiO-1 had a higher overpotential compared with UiO-66	—	—	Text Qualitative	10 · 3.5 Possible degradation mechanism · Fig. 8c