Electrochemistry Application — Fe–O–Zr in MOF for effective photo-Fenton Bisphenol A degradation: Boosting mechanism of electronic transmission

8 measurement groups · 34 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

Photo-Fenton condition screening

FeUiO-1 · Powder

Effects of pH, water quality, catalyst dosage, H2O2 concentration, BPA concentration and inorganic anions on BPA degradation.

Geometry: suspension photocatalysis
Context: FeUiO-1 application tests.
Measurement source: 7 · 3.3 Factors influencing the degradation of BPA by catalysts · Fig. 5

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
BPA degradation with Cl-, SO4(2-) and NO3-	degradation rates still above 94% with Cl-, SO4(2-) and NO3- (10 mM)	—	>94%	Text Rounded Reported	1 · Abstract · Fig. 5f
Carbonate inhibition of BPA degradation	CO3(2-) decreased degradation efficiency to 20.88%	—	—	Text Exact Reported	9 · 3.3 Factors influencing degradation · Fig. 5f
BPA degradation in lake water	56.88%	—	—	Text Exact Reported	8 · 3.3 Factors influencing degradation · Fig. 5b
Selected FeUiO-1 catalyst dosageMarked as a best value within this paper	0.5 g/L chosen as subsequent reaction condition	—	—	Text Exact Reported	8 · 3.3 Factors influencing degradation · Fig. 5c
Selected H2O2 concentrationMarked as a best value within this paper	20 mg/L oxidant	—	—	Text Exact Reported	9 · 3.3 Factors influencing degradation · Fig. 5d
pH operating range	removal rate more than 97% at pH 3-9	—	pH range 3-9	Text Rounded Reported	1 · Abstract · Fig. 5a
BPA degradation in tap water	15.86%	—	—	Text Exact Reported	8 · 3.3 Factors influencing degradation · Fig. 5b

Photo-Fenton BPA degradation

FeUiO-X series · Powder

50.0 mL aqueous BPA, 15.0 mg/L BPA, 100 mW LED visible light, catalyst 0.5 g/L; dark adsorption equilibrium before H2O2 addition and irradiation.

Geometry: suspension photocatalysis
Context: UiO-66 control and FeUiO-X target series.
Measurement source: 3 · 2.3 Experiment

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
BPA degradation efficiency increase vs UiO-66Marked as a best value within this paper	100.8 times	—	—	Text Exact Reported	1 · Abstract
FeUiO-1 BPA removal after 30 minMarked as a best value within this paper	97% removal in 30 min	—	—	Text Rounded Reported	5 · 3.2 Optical Fenton performance · Fig. 4a
FeUiO-1/Vis/H2O2 BPA degradation efficiencyMarked as a best value within this paper	degraded about 96.94% in 30 min	—	—	Text Approximate	6 · 3.2 Optical Fenton performance · Fig. 4b
Natural light vs dark reaction rate	reaction rate under natural light is 2.11 times higher than under dark conditions	—	—	Text Exact Reported	6 · 3.2 Optical Fenton performance · Fig. 4d
FeUiO-1 BPA degradation rate constantMarked as a best value within this paper	0.1209 min-1	—	—	Text Exact Reported	11 · 4 Conclusion
UiO-66 BPA degradation rate constant	0.0012 min-1	—	—	Text Exact Reported	11 · 4 Conclusion
TOC removal for BPA system	69.55%	—	—	Text Exact Reported	1 · Abstract · Fig. 4f

Cyclic degradation stability and metal dissolution

FeUiO-1 · Powder

Five repeated H2O2/Vis/FeUiO-1/BPA cycles; BPA = 15 mg/L, H2O2 = 20 mg/L, catalyst = 0.5 g/L.

Geometry: suspension photocatalysis
Context: FeUiO-1 target sample.
Measurement source: 8 · 3.4 Stability and recyclability of catalysts · Fig. 6a

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
BPA removal after five cycles	about 86.4% BPA after five reactions	—	—	Text Approximate	9 · 3.4 Stability and recyclability · Fig. 6a
Fe ion dissolution Cycle 1	0.57 mg/L	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	7 · Table S4 Iron ion dissolution · Table S4
Fe ion dissolution Cycle 2	0.54 mg/L	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	7 · Table S4 Iron ion dissolution · Table S4
Fe ion dissolution Cycle 3	0.45 mg/L	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	7 · Table S4 Iron ion dissolution · Table S4
Fe ion dissolution Cycle 4	0.36 mg/L	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	7 · Table S4 Iron ion dissolution · Table S4
Fe ion dissolution Cycle 5	0.336 mg/L	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	7 · Table S4 Iron ion dissolution · Table S4
Average ferrous ion dissolution per cycle	0.45 mg/L	—	—	Text Exact Reported	9 · 3.4 Stability and recyclability · Fig. 6a

Mott-Schottky analysis

FeUiO-1 powder/FTO electrochemical electrode · Electrode

Mott-Schottky curves at 500, 750 and 1000 Hz.

Geometry: FTO drop-cast powder/Nafion electrode
Context: FeUiO-1 photoelectrochemical characterisation.
Measurement source: 5 · 3.2 Optical Fenton performance · Fig. 3c

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
FeUiO-1 conduction band	-1.03 eV	—	—	Text Exact Reported	5 · 3.2 Optical Fenton performance · Fig. 3c; Fig. 9
FeUiO-1 semiconductor type	positive Mott-Schottky slope; n-type semiconductor	—	—	Text Qualitative	5 · 3.2 Optical Fenton performance · Fig. 3c
FeUiO-1 valence band	0.99 eV	—	—	Text Exact Reported	5 · 3.2 Optical Fenton performance · Fig. 3c; Fig. 9

Mott-Schottky analysis

UiO-66 powder/FTO electrochemical electrode · Electrode

SI Fig. S10 reports UiO-66 Mott-Schottky band-edge labels.

Geometry: FTO drop-cast powder/Nafion electrode
Context: UiO-66 pristine electrochemical control.
Measurement source: 12 · Fig. S10 · Fig. S10

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
UiO-66 HOMO level from Mott-Schottky SI figure	2.58 eV	—	—	Figure Axis Approximate	12 · Fig. S10 · Fig. S10
UiO-66 LUMO level from Mott-Schottky SI figure	-1.31 eV	—	—	Figure Axis Approximate	12 · Fig. S10 · Fig. S10

Hydroxyl radical quantification by HPLC

FeUiO-X series · Powder

Hydroxyl radical generation in H2O2/Vis system for UiO-66 and FeUiO-X.

Geometry: suspension
Context: UiO-66 control compared with FeUiO-X.
Measurement source: 3 · 2.4 Characterizations · Fig. 5g

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
FeUiO-1 hydroxyl radical generation rateMarked as a best value within this paper	0.0053 mM/min	—	—	Text Exact Reported	1 · Abstract · Fig. 5g
Hydroxyl radical generation increaseMarked as a best value within this paper	increased by 5.8 times	—	—	Text Exact Reported	1 · Abstract · Fig. 5g
UiO-66 hydroxyl radical generation rate	0.0009 mM/min	—	—	Text Exact Reported	1 · Abstract · Fig. 5g

Transient photocurrent response

Photoresponse and photoelectrochemistry

FeUiO-1 powder/FTO electrochemical electrode · Electrode

Visible-light on-off cycles comparing UiO-66 and FeUiO-1.

Geometry: FTO drop-cast powder/Nafion electrode
Context: FeUiO-1 compared with UiO-66.
Measurement source: 5 · 3.2 Optical Fenton performance · Fig. 3d

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
Photocurrent response enhanced by FeUiO-1Marked as a best value within this paper	FeUiO-1 shows much stronger transient photocurrent than UiO-66; UiO-66 has low photocurrent density.	—	—	Text Qualitative	5 · 3.2 Optical Fenton performance · Fig. 3d

BPA degradation comparison table

FeUiO-1 · Powder

SI Table S7 compares BPA degradation systems and includes first-hand FeUiO-1/H2O2/Vis performance under CBPA 0.07 mM, H2O2 0.58 mM, 30 min reaction time.

Geometry: suspension photocatalysis
Context: FeUiO-1 target sample compared with literature systems.
Measurement source: 8 · Table S7 · Table S7

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
SI Table S7 BPA concentration for this work	0.07 mM	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	8 · Table S7 BPA Degradation by different catalysts · Table S7
SI Table S7 H2O2 concentration for this work	0.58 mM	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	8 · Table S7 BPA Degradation by different catalysts · Table S7
SI Table S7 FeUiO-1/H2O2/Vis removal rateMarked as a best value within this paper	97.50%	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	8 · Table S7 BPA Degradation by different catalysts · Table S7
SI Table S7 reaction time for this work	30 min	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	8 · Table S7 BPA Degradation by different catalysts · Table S7