Porosity — Fe–O–Zr in MOF for effective photo-Fenton Bisphenol A degradation: Boosting mechanism of electronic transmission

Measurement evidence

Porosity

Fe–O–Zr in MOF for effective photo-Fenton Bisphenol A degradation: Boosting mechanism of electronic transmission · Guan Z., Zhu S., Ding S. et al. · Chemosphere · 2022 · 134481

1 measurement group · 7 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

N2 adsorption isotherm

FeUiO-1 · Powder

N2 adsorption used to compare pore-size/surface-area changes of UiO-66 and FeUiO-1.

Temperature
77
Atmosphere
N2
Geometry
powder
Context
FeUiO-1 compared with UiO-66.
Measurement source
7, 10 · Table S3; Fig. S6 · Table S3; Fig. S6
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
FeUiO-1 adsorption average pore size2.381 nm2SI Table
Exact Reported
7, 10 · Table S3; Fig. S6 · Table S3; Fig. S6
UiO-66 adsorption average pore sizeMarked as a best value within this paper4.343 nm2SI Table
Exact Reported
7, 10 · Table S3; Fig. S6 · Table S3; Fig. S6
FeUiO-1 BET surface areaMarked as a best value within this paper341.1836 m2/g-KSI Table
Exact Reported
7, 10 · Table S3; Fig. S6 · Table S3; Fig. S6
UiO-66 BET surface area27.5064 m2/g-KSI Table
Exact Reported
7, 10 · Table S3; Fig. S6 · Table S3; Fig. S6
FeUiO-1 pore volumeMarked as a best value within this paper0.092 cm3/g (Fig. S6 label: 0.092553 cm3/g)SI Table
Exact Reported
7, 10 · Table S3; Fig. S6 · Table S3; Fig. S6
UiO-66 pore volume0.064 cm3/g (Fig. S6 label: 0.064064 cm3/g)SI Table
Exact Reported
7, 10 · Table S3; Fig. S6 · Table S3; Fig. S6
Specific surface area change after Fe additionspecific surface area of MOFs became larger after the addition of FeText
Qualitative
4 · 3.1 Morphologies and structures · Fig. S6 referenced