Electrochemistry Application — Novel 2D CuFe-MOF-based immunoprobe: Addressing antifouling electrochemical immunosensing inadequate sensitivity challenge

Measurement evidence

Electrochemistry Application

Novel 2D CuFe-MOF-based immunoprobe: Addressing antifouling electrochemical immunosensing inadequate sensitivity challenge · Jiang X., Yao T., Wang S. et al. · Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical · 2024 · 135410

4 measurement groups · 12 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

Cyclic voltammetry (CV)

GCE-Gel-Ab1-Antigen-Probe immunosensor · Electrode

10 mM PBS including 0.1 M KCl, pH 7.4; sequential GCE, GCE-Gel, GCE-Gel-Ab1, GCE-Gel-Ab1-Antigen, GCE-Gel-Ab1-Antigen-Probe.

Geometry
three-electrode GCE system
Context
complete immunosensor fabrication sequence
Measurement source
5 · 3.4 Electrochemical characterization · Fig. 3A
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Current response after CuFe-MOF immunoprobe bindingdramatic growth in current response observed after 2D immunoprobes were bondedText
Qualitative
6 · 3.4 Electrochemical characterization · Fig. 3A

Cyclic voltammetry effective-area analysis

2D CuFe-MOF · Nanosheet

Scan rates 10-500 mV s-1 in 1 mM K3[Fe(CN)6] containing 0.1 M KCl; Randles-Sevcik equation.

Geometry
CuFe nanosheet-modified GCE versus bare GCE
Context
target MOF on electrode versus bare electrode
Measurement source
1.4 Supplementary Figures · Fig. S3
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Bare GCE effective electrode area, conflicting assignment0.07 cm2 (main-text inferred; SI caption order conflicts)Text
Uncertain
1.4 Supplementary Figures · Fig. S3
Effective electrode area modified with 2D CuFe-MOFMarked as a best value within this paper0.077 cm2Text
Exact Reported
5 · 3.3 Characterization of immunoprobe · Fig. S3

EIS antifouling degree of contamination

GCE-Gel · Electrode

Bare, BSA-modified and gel-modified GCE exposed to real human serum dilutions.

Atmosphere
serum dilutions
Geometry
GCE electrode
Context
hydrogel antifouling layer versus BSA and bare GCE
Measurement source
6 · 3.5 Antifouling performance · Fig. 4
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Bare GCE degree of contamination at 100% serum1962.4%Text
Exact Reported
7 · 3.5 Antifouling performance · Fig. 4
Bare GCE degree of contamination at 20% serum377.7%Text
Exact Reported
6 · 3.5 Antifouling performance · Fig. 4
Bare GCE degree of contamination at 40% serum646.5%Text
Exact Reported
6 · 3.5 Antifouling performance · Fig. 4
Bare GCE degree of contamination at 60% serum813.9%Text
Exact Reported
6 · 3.5 Antifouling performance · Fig. 4
Bare GCE degree of contamination at 80% serum1061.6%Text
Exact Reported
6 · 3.5 Antifouling performance · Fig. 4
BSA-modified GCE degree of contamination at 100% serumapproximately 780%visual estimate from bar heightVisual Estimate
Approximate
6 · 3.5 Antifouling performance · Fig. 4
Gel-modified GCE degree of contamination at 100% serumMarked as a best value within this paper39.3%Text
Exact Reported
7 · 3.5 Antifouling performance · Fig. 4
Gel-modified GCE contamination range across serum dilutionsMarked as a best value within this paperapproximately 20-39.3% from 20-100% serumvisual estimate for 20-80%; 39.3% text-reported at 100%Visual Estimate
Range
6 · 3.5 Antifouling performance · Fig. 4

Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS)

GCE-Gel-Ab1-Antigen-Probe immunosensor · Electrode

5 mM [Fe(CN)6]4-/3- including 0.1 M KCl; sequential interface modification.

Geometry
three-electrode GCE system
Context
complete immunosensor fabrication sequence
Measurement source
6 · 3.4 Electrochemical characterization · Fig. 3B
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
EIS construction verificationEIS detections consistent with CV, indicating successful constructionText
Qualitative
6 · 3.4 Electrochemical characterization · Fig. 3B