Other — Novel 2D CuFe-MOF-based immunoprobe: Addressing antifouling electrochemical immunosensing inadequate sensitivity challenge

2 measurement groups · 4 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

GCE-Gel · Electrode

Bare GCE and ST-HA-hydrogel-modified GCE compared for hydrophilicity.

Geometry: water droplet on electrode surface
Context: hydrogel versus bare electrode
Measurement source: 3 · 3.2 Verification of the construction of antifouling hydrogel · Fig. 1C,D

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
Bare GCE contact angle	99.6 degrees	—	—	Text Exact Reported	3 · 3.2 Verification of hydrogel · Fig. 1C
ST-HA hydrogel-modified GCE contact angleMarked as a best value within this paper	32.8 degrees	—	—	Text Exact Reported	3 · 3.2 Verification of hydrogel · Fig. 1D

Au-Thi@ST-HA hydrogel · Thin Film

ST-HA gel before and after thionine adsorption.

Context: hydrogel substrate
Measurement source: 3 · 3.2 Verification of the construction of antifouling hydrogel · Fig. S1

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
Gel-Thi zeta potential	-1.65 mV	—	—	Text Exact Reported	3 · 3.2 Verification of hydrogel · Fig. S1
ST-HA gel zeta potential	-21.1 mV	—	—	Text Exact Reported	3 · 3.2 Verification of hydrogel · Fig. S1