Measurement evidence
Ligand-Insertion Strategy for Constructing 2D Conjugated Metal–Organic Framework with Large Pore Size for Electrochemical Analytics · Wang X.-Z., Chen Y., Cao X.-M. et al. · Angewandte Chemie - International Edition · 2025 · e202413115
Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.
Bare GCE reference electrode · Electrode
DPV for 5-HT, UA and CA under same pulse settings; comparative calibration plots in Figure S17.
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|
Cu3(HHTP)(DHBQ)1.5/1.53-coated GCE · Electrode
PBS 0.1 M, pH 7.4; analytes 5-HT, UA and CA; CV at 100 mV s-1; DPV pulse width 0.05 s and pulse amplitude 0.05 V.
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-HT DPV linear concentration range on target electrode | 1-70 uM | — | — | Text Range | 6 · Electrochemical Analysis with MOF-Coated Electrodes · Figure 4d |
| 5-HT limit of detection on target electrode | 0.37 uM | 3.7e-7 mol L-1 | 3sigma/k level | Text Exact Reported | 6 · Electrochemical Analysis with MOF-Coated Electrodes · Figure 4d |
| Caffeic acid DPV linear concentration range on target electrode | 0.04-120 uM | — | — | Text Range | 6 · Electrochemical Analysis with MOF-Coated Electrodes · Figure 4f |
| Caffeic acid limit of detection on target electrodeMarked as a best value within this paper | 0.021 uM | 2.1e-8 mol L-1 | 3sigma/k level | Text Exact Reported | 6 · Electrochemical Analysis with MOF-Coated Electrodes · Figure 4f |
| Caffeic acid CV peak separation on target electrode | 110 mV | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 6 · Electrochemical Analysis with MOF-Coated Electrodes · Figure 4a-c |
| 5-HT LOD relative to bare GCE | target LOD is 1/135.1 of bare GCE LOD | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 6 · Electrochemical Analysis with MOF-Coated Electrodes · Figures S17-S18 |
| UA LOD relative to Cu3(HHTP)2/GCEMarked as a best value within this paper | target UA LOD is 1/21.7 of Cu3(HHTP)2/GCE LOD | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 6 · Electrochemical Analysis with MOF-Coated Electrodes · Figures S17-S18 |
| Target electrode 5-HT DPV calibration slope | Ip(uA) = 0.00937 c5-HT(uM) + 0.0547; R2 = 0.991 | — | — | Figure Axis Approximate | 6 · Figure 4 · Figure 4d |
| Target electrode CA DPV calibration slopeMarked as a best value within this paper | Ip(uA) = 0.0814 cCA(uM) + 0.619; R2 = 0.997 | — | — | Figure Axis Approximate | 6 · Figure 4 · Figure 4f |
| Target electrode UA DPV calibration slopeMarked as a best value within this paper | Ip(uA) = 0.0680 cUA(uM) + 0.0679; R2 = 0.993 | — | — | Figure Axis Approximate | 6 · Figure 4 · Figure 4e |
| Uric acid DPV linear concentration range on target electrode | 0.25-100 uM | — | — | Text Range | 6 · Electrochemical Analysis with MOF-Coated Electrodes · Figure 4e |
| Uric acid LOD in literature-comparison Table S6Marked as a best value within this paper | Cu3(HHTP)(DHBQ)1.5(3-)/GCE: linear range 0.25-100 uM, LOD 0.025 uM, DPV | 2.5e-8 mol L-1 | — | SI Table Exact Reported | 14 · Table S6 · Table S6 |
| Uric acid limit of detection on target electrodeMarked as a best value within this paper | 0.025 uM | 2.5e-8 mol L-1 | 3sigma/k level | Text Exact Reported | 6 · Electrochemical Analysis with MOF-Coated Electrodes · Figure 4e; Table S6 |