SEM/EDS
Au/Cu-THQ/GCE · Electrode
SEM of Au/Cu-THQ/GCE and Au/Cu-TCPP/GCE at 3.0 kV after electrode surface modification; EDS mapping in SI.
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Au mass-normalised percentage on Au/Cu-TCPP/GCE surface | 89.58 mass norm% | — | — | SI Table Exact Reported | 12 · Supplementary Materials · Figure S8 |
| Au atom percentage on Au/Cu-TCPP/GCE surface | 48.26 atom% (main text calls this mass percentage; SI table labels it Atom [%]) | — | — | SI Table Exact Reported | 12 · Supplementary Materials · Figure S8 |
| Au morphology on Cu-TCPP/GCE | AuNPs unevenly deposited on Cu-TCPP/GCE | — | — | Text Qualitative | 5 · Preparation and characterization of Au/2D-MOF/GCE · Figure 2B; Figure S8 |
| Au mass-normalised percentage on Au/Cu-THQ/GCE surfaceMarked as a best value within this paper | 98.62 mass norm% | — | — | SI Table Exact Reported | 13 · Supplementary Materials · Figure S9 |
| Au atom percentage on Au/Cu-THQ/GCE surfaceMarked as a best value within this paper | 84.96 atom% (main text calls this mass percentage; SI table labels it Atom [%]) | — | — | SI Table Exact Reported | 13 · Supplementary Materials · Figure S9 |
| Au morphology on Cu-THQ/GCEMarked as a best value within this paper | evenly deposited and fully covered; nanoflower-like 3D architecture | — | — | Text Qualitative | 5 · Preparation and characterization of Au/2D-MOF/GCE · Figure 2C; Figure S9 |