Sensing Application — Metal–Organic Frameworks Coordination-Oriented Polymer Dielectrics for Neuromorphic Vision Sensors

6 measurement groups · 36 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

36 x 36 sensor-array motion trajectory simulation and tiny artificial neural network action recognition

PM1-based NeuVS OFET · Electrode

Four motion classes: moving down, up, right, and left. Four-bit optical pulse encoding; 1 = 2.04 mW/cm2 light, 0 = dark, 200 ms pulse, 50% duty cycle.

Geometry: NeuVS array compared with conventional image sensor
Context: PM1 target compared with PAA NeuVS and conventional image sensor
Measurement source: 9-11 · 3.5 · Figure 5

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
Simulated sensor array size	36 x 36	—	—	Text Exact Reported	9-10 · 3.5 · Figure 5A
Optical pulse duty cycle	50%	—	—	Text Exact Reported	10 · 3.5 · Figure 5B
Optical pulse encoding light intensity for digit 1	2.04 mW/cm2	—	—	Text Exact Reported	10 · 3.5 · Figure 5B
Optical pulse duration for action encoding	200 ms	0.2 s	—	Text Exact Reported	10 · 3.5 · Figure 5B
Conventional image sensor action recognition accuracy	~25%	—	~	Text Approximate	11 · 3.5 · Figure 5D
PAA NeuVS action recognition accuracy	95% after about 100 training rounds	—	about 100 training rounds	Text Rounded Reported	11 · 3.5 · Figure 5D
PM1 NeuVS action recognition accuracyMarked as a best value within this paper	95% after about 40 training rounds	—	about 40 training rounds	Text Rounded Reported	11 · 3.5 · Figure 5D

Static-image colour extraction simulation using measured pulse responses

PM1-based NeuVS OFET · Electrode

RGB image components mapped to 690, 515, and 450 nm light intensities; PAA and PM1 tested under 1, 2, 5, and 10 light pulses.

Geometry: NeuVS array simulation
Context: PM1 target compared with PAA control
Measurement source: 29-30 · Supporting Note S1 · Figure 4H; Supporting Information Figures S25-S27

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
PAA vs PM1 blue-component output ratio	fOutput(PAA) approximately 0.159 fOutput(PM1)	—	approximately	Text Approximate	30 · Supporting Note S1 · Supporting Note S1
RGB mapped wavelengths	690, 515, and 450 nm	—	—	Text Exact Reported	29 · Supporting Note S1 · Supporting Note S1
PAA photocurrent at 450 nm and 10 pulses	~4.5 nA	—	—	Visual Estimate Approximate	26 · Supporting Information · Figure S25A
PM1 photocurrent at 450 nm and 10 pulsesMarked as a best value within this paper	~22 nA	—	—	Visual Estimate Approximate	26 · Supporting Information · Figure S25A

Control-device transfer curves, P, R, D*, capacitance and mobility

PM0.5 and PM3 MOF-loading devices · Electrode

PM0.5/PM3 loading controls, PZ1/PZ2 Zr-species controls, PM-T1/PM-T2 thickness controls, PT1/PT2 MOF-545 controls, aM1/aM2 polyacrylic acid controls, and PAN/NM1/NM2 controls.

Geometry: C10-DNTT NeuVS devices with modified dielectric layers
Context: Mechanistic controls relative to PM1
Measurement source: 6-7 · 3.2 · Supporting Information Figures S13-S21

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
Optimal MOF loading trendMarked as a best value within this paper	PM1 outperforms PM0.5, PM2, and PM3 in P/R/D* trends	—	—	Qualitative Qualitative	6 · 3.2 · Supporting Information Figure S13
Effect of MOF-545 addition	Moderate MOF-545 addition improves device performance; MOF-545 size also affects performance	—	—	Qualitative Qualitative	6 · 3.2 · Supporting Information Figure S19
Effect of Zr-BTB addition to PAN	Zr-BTB addition has a significant negative effect on optoelectronic performance of PAN-based devices	—	—	Qualitative Qualitative	7 · 3.2 · Supporting Information Figure S21
Effect of Zr-BTB in polyacrylic acid	Moderate Zr-BTB improves photoresponse and excessive Zr-BTB degrades photoresponse	—	—	Qualitative Qualitative	6-7 · 3.2 · Supporting Information Figure S20
Effect of Zr salts/clusters alone	Addition of Zr species decreased device performance	—	—	Qualitative Qualitative	6 · 3.2 · Supporting Information Figure S16
Effect of Zr-BTB nanosheet thickness	Increasing nanosheet thickness significantly decreases device/photoresponsive performance	—	—	Qualitative Qualitative	6 · 3.2 · Supporting Information Figure S18

450 nm monochromatic-light phototransistor photoresponse

Photoresponse and photoelectrochemistry

PM1-based NeuVS OFET · Electrode

Nineteen illumination densities from 0.61 to 105.73 mW/cm2; transfer curves and photocurrent distributions measured for PAA, PM1, PM2 devices.

Atmosphere: air
Geometry: NeuVS OFET
Context: PAA control vs PM1/PM2 MOF-polymer composites
Measurement source: 5 · 3.2 · Figure 2F-L; Supporting Information Figures S10-S12

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
PAA dynamic response range	112.25 dB	—	—	Figure Axis Rounded Reported	5-6 · 3.2 · Figure 2J-L
450 nm illumination density range	0.61 to 105.73 mW/cm2	—	—	Text Range	5 · 3.2 · Figure 2F-H; Supporting Information Figure S10
PM1 dynamic response rangeMarked as a best value within this paper	122.30 dB	—	—	Text Rounded Reported	5-6 · 3.2 · Figure 2J-L
PM1 maximum photosensitivity PMarked as a best value within this paper	exceeding 10^6	—	>	Text Approximate	6 · 3.2 · Figure 2I; Supporting Information Figure S11
PM2 dynamic response range	103.76 dB	—	—	Figure Axis Rounded Reported	5-6 · 3.2 · Figure 2J-L

Benchmark comparison with representative neuromorphic synaptic transistors

PM1-based NeuVS OFET · Electrode

SI Table S4 compares material structure, VDS, mobility, energy consumption, PPF, and recognition accuracy; extracted only this work row as first-hand evidence.

Geometry: C10-DNTT/PM1 NeuVS
Context: This-work row compared with literature rows
Measurement source: 32-33 · Supporting Information · Table S4

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
SI Table S4 this-work recognition accuracyMarked as a best value within this paper	95%	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	32-33 · Supporting Information · Table S4
SI Table S4 this-work energy consumption	5.5 x 10^-15 J	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	32-33 · Supporting Information · Table S4
SI Table S4 this-work mobilityMarked as a best value within this paper	20.62 cm2/(V s)	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	32-33 · Supporting Information · Table S4
SI Table S4 this-work PPFMarked as a best value within this paper	223%	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	32-33 · Supporting Information · Table S4
SI Table S4 this-work VDS	-1 V	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	32-33 · Supporting Information · Table S4

Excitatory postsynaptic current (EPSC), STP, and PPF measurements under optical pulses

PM1-based NeuVS OFET · Electrode

450 nm, 0.61 mW/cm2, 1 s pulses unless otherwise stated; synaptic behaviours at VDS = -0.2 V and VGS = -0.1 V.

Geometry: ITO/PM1/C10-DNTT/Au NeuVS OFET
Context: PM1 target compared with PAA control
Measurement source: 8-9 · 3.3 · Figure 4B-G; Supporting Information Figures S22-S24

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
Synaptic transistor low operating voltage	1 mV	—	—	Text Exact Reported	9 · 3.3 · Supporting Information Figure S24
PAA single-event synaptic energy consumptionMarked as a best value within this paper	1.28 fJ	—	—	Text Exact Reported	9 · 3.3 · Supporting Information Figure S24
PAA maximum PPF	182%	—	—	Text Rounded Reported	9 · 3.3 · Supporting Information Figure S23A
PAA EPSC relaxation time t0	3.9 s	—	—	Text Rounded Reported	8-9 · 3.3 · Figure 4B; Supporting Information Figure S22
PM1 single-event synaptic energy consumption	5.5 fJ	—	—	Text Exact Reported	9 · 3.3 · Supporting Information Figure S24
PM1 EPSC peak range with light intensity	0.39 nA to 24.14 nA as intensity increased from 0.61 to 25.26 mW/cm2	—	—	Text Range	9 · 3.3 · Figure 4E
PM1 maximum PPFMarked as a best value within this paper	223%	—	—	Text Rounded Reported	9 · 3.3 · Figure 4D; Supporting Information Figure S23A
PM1 EPSC relaxation time t0Marked as a best value within this paper	5.3 s	—	—	Text Rounded Reported	9 · 3.3 · Figure 4B; Supporting Information Figure S22
PM1 t0 tuning rangeMarked as a best value within this paper	0.06 to 16.6 s	—	—	Text Range	9 · 3.3 · Figure 4E-G