Spectroscopy — sp-Carbon Incorporated Conductive Metal-Organic Framework as Photocathode for Photoelectrochemical Hydrogen Generation

Measurement evidence

Spectroscopy

sp-Carbon Incorporated Conductive Metal-Organic Framework as Photocathode for Photoelectrochemical Hydrogen Generation · Lu Y., Zhong H., Li J. et al. · Angewandte Chemie - International Edition · 2022 · e202208163

5 measurement groups · 20 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

operando electrochemical resonance Raman spectroscopy

Cu3HHAE2 photocathode on Cu foam · Electrode

0.1 M Na2SO4, 594 nm laser excitation, potential scan from 0.7 to 0.0 V vs RHE; confocal Raman microscope with Ar flow, 20x objective, about 1.5 mW laser.

Atmosphere
continuous Ar flow
Geometry
Cu3HHAE2 photocathode/electrochemical Raman cell
Context
supported Cu3HHAE2 electrode during PEC HER
Measurement source
4 · Operando Raman · Figure 5a; Figure S9c
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
operando Raman potential scan range0.7 to 0.0 V vs RHErangeText
Range
4 · Operando Raman · Figure 5a
intrinsic sp-carbon Raman signal at OCP2116 cm-1Text
Rounded Reported
4 · Operando Raman · Figure 5a; Figure S9c
transient Raman band under HER2044 cm-1Text
Rounded Reported
4 · Operando Raman · Figure 5a

FT-IR spectroscopy

as-synthesised Cu3HHAE2 powder/hexagonal rods · Powder

Bruker Optics ALPHA-E ATR, 400-4000 cm-1; compared CuSO4.5H2O, HHAE and Cu3HHAE2.

Context
pristine Cu3HHAE2 powder with HHAE and CuSO4.5H2O references
Measurement source
8 · Figure S2 caption · Figure S2
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Cu3HHAE2 sp-carbon FT-IR vibrationstrong vibrational peak at 2200 cm-1Caption
Rounded Reported
8 · Figure S2 caption · Figure S2
HHAE sp-carbon FT-IR vibrationweak vibrational peak at 2250 cm-1Caption
Rounded Reported
8 · Figure S2 caption · Figure S2

ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS)

as-synthesised Cu3HHAE2 powder/hexagonal rods · Powder

He I source 21.22 eV under ultrahigh vacuum; SECO and low binding-energy HOMO regions analysed.

Atmosphere
ultrahigh vacuum about 3 x 10^-9 Torr
Geometry
film on heavily doped n-type Si wafer
Context
pristine Cu3HHAE2 film
Measurement source
14 · Figure S8 caption · Figure S8
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
H2O/H2 redox pair energy level comparison-4.44 eVText
Exact Reported
3 · Optoelectronic properties
estimated LUMO level-4.39 eVCalculated From Reported
Exact Reported
3 · Optoelectronic properties · Figure 3d; Figure S8
Fermi level-4.60 eVCaption
Exact Reported
14 · Figure S8 caption · Figure S8
HOMO level-5.26 eVCaption
Exact Reported
14 · Figure S8 caption · Figure S8

UV-vis-NIR absorption and Tauc plot

Cu3HHAE2 drop-cast film on quartz glass · Thin Film

Catalyst drop-cast on quartz glass in transmission mode; compared HHAE and Cu3HHAE2, absorption followed to 1600 nm.

Geometry
film on quartz glass
Context
Cu3HHAE2 film with HHAE control
Measurement source
3 · Optoelectronic properties · Figure 3c; Figure S7; Figure S10
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
broad absorption extends to1600 nmText
Rounded Reported
3 · Optoelectronic properties · Figure 3c
optical band gapMarked as a best value within this paperabout 0.87 eVaboutText
Approximate
3 · Optoelectronic properties · Figure 3c; Figure S7
Cu3HHAE2 absorption peak assigned to ligand-to-Cu transition480 nmCaption
Rounded Reported
16 · Figure S10 caption · Figure S10

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS)

as-synthesised Cu3HHAE2 powder/hexagonal rods · Powder

Kratos AXIS Supra/Ultra; monochromatic Al Kalpha source 1486.7 eV; Ar+ etch 60 s before high-resolution scans.

Atmosphere
ultrahigh vacuum about 3 x 10^-9 Torr
Context
pristine powder/film deposited on heavily doped n-type Si wafer
Measurement source
2 · XPS analysis · Figure 1d; Figure S4
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
C 1s C=O binding energy288.9 eVText
Exact Reported
2 · XPS analysis · Figure 1d
C 1s C-O binding energy286.9 eVText
Exact Reported
2 · XPS analysis · Figure 1d
C 1s C-C(sp) binding energy285.6 eVText
Exact Reported
2 · XPS analysis · Figure 1d
C 1s C-C(sp2) binding energy284.9 eVText
Exact Reported
2 · XPS analysis · Figure 1d
Cu 2p binding energy peak 1934 eVCaption
Rounded Reported
10 · Figure S4 caption · Figure S4
Cu 2p binding energy peak 2941 eVCaption
Rounded Reported
10 · Figure S4 caption · Figure S4
Cu 2p binding energy peak 3944 eVCaption
Rounded Reported
10 · Figure S4 caption · Figure S4
C(sp2):C(sp) peak area ratioclose to 2:1close toText
Approximate
2 · XPS analysis · Figure 1d