EPR
Cu-CAT-Rad · Powder
Powder EPR; ligand-centred monoradical signal
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPR g value | g = 2.001 | — | — | Text Rounded Reported | 2 · Results and Discussion · Figure 2j |
Spectroscopy — Radiation-Induced in Situ Construction of 2D Conductive Defect-Rich Metal-Organic Frameworks for High-Performance Supercapacitor
Measurement evidence
Spectroscopy
Radiation-Induced in Situ Construction of 2D Conductive Defect-Rich Metal-Organic Frameworks for High-Performance Supercapacitor · Zhang K., Mao X., Yan W. et al. · Small · 2025 · e07135
8 measurement groups · 18 results
Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.
EPR
Cu-CAT-Sol · Powder
Powder EPR; ligand-centred monoradical signal
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPR g value | g = 2.001 | — | — | Text Rounded Reported | 2 · Results and Discussion · Figure 2j |
FT-IR and Raman
Cu-CAT-Rad · Powder
400-4000 cm-1 FT-IR; Raman comparison
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FT-IR C=O stretch | 1650 cm-1 | — | — | Text Rounded Reported | 3 · Results and Discussion · Figure S13 |
| FT-IR Cu-O stretch | 450 cm-1 | — | — | Text Rounded Reported | 3 · Results and Discussion · Figure S13 |
FT-IR and Raman
Cu-CAT-Sol · Powder
400-4000 cm-1 FT-IR; Raman comparison
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|
Cu K-edge XANES/FT-EXAFS/WT-EXAFS fitting
Cu-CAT-Rad · Powder
Reference samples Cu foil, Cu2O and CuO
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average Cu-O bond length | approx1.92 A | — | — | Text Approximate | 5 · Results and Discussion · Table S3; Figure 3f |
| Average Cu coordination number | approx3.39 | — | — | Text Approximate | 5 · Results and Discussion · Table S3 |
| EXAFS fit R factor | 0.0130 | — | — | SI Table Rounded Reported | 15 · Section S4 · Table S3 |
Cu K-edge XANES/FT-EXAFS/WT-EXAFS fitting
Cu-CAT-Sol · Powder
Reference samples Cu foil, Cu2O and CuO
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average Cu-O bond length | 1.96 A | — | — | Text Rounded Reported | 5 · Results and Discussion · Table S3; Figure 3f |
| Average Cu coordination number | 3.87 | — | — | Text Rounded Reported | 5 · Results and Discussion · Table S3 |
| EXAFS fit R factor | 0.0360 | — | — | SI Table Rounded Reported | 15 · Section S4 · Table S3 |
XPS
Cu-CAT-Rad · Powder
Cu 2p, O 1s and C 1s core-level spectra
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cu+ 2p1/2 binding energy | 952.56 eV | — | — | Text Rounded Reported | 3 · Results and Discussion · Figure 3a |
| Cu+ 2p3/2 binding energy | 932.87 eV | — | — | Text Rounded Reported | 3 · Results and Discussion · Figure 3a |
| Cu2+ 2p1/2 binding energy | 954.41 eV | — | — | Text Rounded Reported | 3 · Results and Discussion · Figure 3a |
| Cu2+ 2p3/2 binding energy | 934.56 eV | — | — | Text Rounded Reported | 3 · Results and Discussion · Figure 3a |
| Cu+ fraction from XPSMarked as a best value within this paper | 31.3% | — | — | Figure Axis Rounded Reported | 14 · Section S4 · Figure S16 |
| O 1s C-O-Cu component | 531.00 eV | — | — | Text Rounded Reported | 4 · Results and Discussion · Figure 3b |
| O 1s C=O-Cu component | 532.76 eV | — | — | Text Rounded Reported | 4 · Results and Discussion · Figure 3b |
XPS
Cu-CAT-Sol · Powder
Cu 2p, O 1s and C 1s core-level spectra
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cu+ fraction from XPS | 14.2% | — | — | Figure Axis Rounded Reported | 14 · Section S4 · Figure S16 |