Electrochemistry Application — Detection of Ascorbic Acid by Two-Dimensional Conductive Metal-Organic Framework-Based Electrochemical Sensors

Measurement evidence

Electrochemistry Application

Detection of Ascorbic Acid by Two-Dimensional Conductive Metal-Organic Framework-Based Electrochemical Sensors · Wang S., Li P., Wang J. et al. · Molecules · 2024 · 2413

6 measurement groups · 24 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

CV optimisation of Cu3(HHTP)2 loading

Cu3(HHTP)2/SPE · Electrode

AA oxidation current compared for Cu3(HHTP)2 dispersion concentrations of 1, 2, 4, and 8 mg/mL on SPE; bar heights read from SI Figure S3.

Geometry
screen-printed electrode sensor
Context
Cu3(HHTP)2 composite electrode loading optimisation
Measurement source
2 · Supplementary Materials · Figure S3
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
selected Cu3(HHTP)2 loading for follow-up testsMarked as a best value within this paper4 mg/mL4 mg/mLText
Exact Reported
3 · 2. Results and Discussion · Figure S3
AA oxidation current at 1 mg/mL Cu3(HHTP)2 loadingabout 3.0 uA from SI Figure S3 bar3 uAVisual Estimate
Approximate
2 · Supplementary Materials · Figure S3
AA oxidation current at 2 mg/mL Cu3(HHTP)2 loadingabout 4.2 uA from SI Figure S3 bar4.2 uAVisual Estimate
Approximate
2 · Supplementary Materials · Figure S3
AA oxidation current at 4 mg/mL Cu3(HHTP)2 loadingMarked as a best value within this paperabout 4.8 uA from SI Figure S3 bar4.8 uAVisual Estimate
Approximate
2 · Supplementary Materials · Figure S3
AA oxidation current at 8 mg/mL Cu3(HHTP)2 loadingabout 3.8 uA from SI Figure S3 bar3.8 uAVisual Estimate
Approximate
2 · Supplementary Materials · Figure S3

cyclic voltammetry (CV)

bare SPE · Electrode

Bare SPE control in AA under the same CV comparison; 0.1 mol/L PBS and 100 mV/s reported for CV tests.

Geometry
bare screen-printed electrode
Context
bare electrode control
Measurement source
4 · 2. Results and Discussion · Figure 3a
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
AA oxidation current on bare SPE5.01 x 10-6 A5.01 uAText
Exact Reported
4 · 2. Results and Discussion · Figure 3a
AA oxidation peak potential on bare SPE0.48 VText
Exact Reported
4 · 2. Results and Discussion · Figure 3a

cyclic voltammetry (CV)

Cu3(HHTP)2/SPE · Electrode

0.1 mol/L PBS; CV range -1 to 1 V; scan rate 100 mV/s; with or without 1 mM AA; optimised at pH 6 and 4 mg/mL Cu3(HHTP)2.

Geometry
screen-printed electrode sensor
Context
Cu3(HHTP)2 composite electrode compared against bare SPE
Measurement source
3-4 · 2. Results and Discussion; 3.2.4. Electrochemical Test · Figure 3a
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
AA oxidation current on Cu3(HHTP)2/SPEMarked as a best value within this paper1.98 x 10-5 A19.8 uAText
Exact Reported
4 · 2. Results and Discussion · Figure 3a
AA oxidation potential on Cu3(HHTP)2/SPEMarked as a best value within this paper0.27 VText
Exact Reported
4 · 2. Results and Discussion · Figure 3a
Cu+/Cu2+ oxidation peak potential0.28 VText
Exact Reported
4 · 2. Results and Discussion · Figure 3a
C-O to C=O oxidation peak potential-0.21 VText
Exact Reported
4 · 2. Results and Discussion · Figure 3a

electrochemically active surface area by Randles-Sevcik equation

Cu3(HHTP)2/SPE · Electrode

CV of 5 mM K4[Fe(CN)6] in 0.1 M KCl at scan rates 20, 50, 80, 120, 150, and 180 mV/s.

Geometry
screen-printed electrode sensor
Context
Cu3(HHTP)2 composite electrode
Measurement source
4,8 · 2. Results and Discussion; 3.2.5. Calculation of Electrochemically Surface Area
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
electroactive surface area from discussionMarked as a best value within this paper0.72 cm20.72 cm2Text
Exact Reported
4 · 2. Results and Discussion
electroactive area from methods calculationA = 0.07 cm20.07 cm2Text
Exact Reported
8 · 3.2.5. Calculation of Electrochemically Surface Area

pH optimisation for AA electrocatalysis

Cu3(HHTP)2/SPE · Electrode

AA oxidation current compared from pH 4 to pH 8; point values read from SI Figure S4.

Geometry
screen-printed electrode sensor
Context
Cu3(HHTP)2 composite electrode pH optimisation
Measurement source
3 · Supplementary Materials · Figure S4
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
selected pH for follow-up testsMarked as a best value within this paperpH = 6Text
Exact Reported
3 · 2. Results and Discussion · Figure S4
AA oxidation current at pH 4about 10.9 uA from SI Figure S4 point10.9 uAVisual Estimate
Approximate
3 · Supplementary Materials · Figure S4
AA oxidation current at pH 5about 10.7 uA from SI Figure S4 point10.7 uAVisual Estimate
Approximate
3 · Supplementary Materials · Figure S4
AA oxidation current at pH 6Marked as a best value within this paperabout 19.8 uA from SI Figure S4 point19.8 uAVisual Estimate
Approximate
3 · Supplementary Materials · Figure S4
AA oxidation current at pH 7about 11.9 uA from SI Figure S4 point11.9 uAVisual Estimate
Approximate
3 · Supplementary Materials · Figure S4
AA oxidation current at pH 8about 11.2 uA from SI Figure S4 point11.2 uAVisual Estimate
Approximate
3 · Supplementary Materials · Figure S4

CV scan-rate dependence

Cu3(HHTP)2/SPE · Electrode

CV tests at different scan rates; Figure 3c visually spans 20-180 mV/s and Figure 3d plots peak current versus v^1/2.

Geometry
screen-printed electrode sensor
Context
Cu3(HHTP)2 composite electrode
Measurement source
5 · 2. Results and Discussion · Figure 3c,d
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
peak current versus v^1/2 intercept-2.984 uAText
Exact Reported
5 · 2. Results and Discussion · Figure 3d
maximum scan rate in Figure 3c180 mV/sFigure Axis
Rounded Reported
5 · 2. Results and Discussion · Figure 3c
minimum scan rate in Figure 3c20 mV/sFigure Axis
Rounded Reported
5 · 2. Results and Discussion · Figure 3c
scan-rate linear fit R2R2 = 0.99Text
Exact Reported
5 · 2. Results and Discussion · Figure 3d
peak current versus v^1/2 slopey = -0.342x - 2.984Text
Exact Reported
5 · 2. Results and Discussion · Figure 3d