Electrochemistry Application — Large π-Conjugated Metal-Organic Frameworks for Infrared-Light-Driven CO2Reduction

7 measurement groups · 30 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

NIR-light-driven photocatalytic CO2 reduction

TBCP-MOF crystals · Single Crystal

same conditions as TNP-MOF series comparison

Context: pristine MOF
Measurement source: 1223 · Figure 5 · Figure 5H

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
HCOO- amount after 12 h NIR	~0.0 μmol	—	—	Visual Estimate Approximate	1223 · Figure 5 · Figure 5H
HCOO- under NIR	not detected	—	—	Text Qualitative	1226 · NIR-Light-Driven CO2Reduction Performance · Figure 5H
TOF per cell formula unit	~0.0 h-1	—	—	Visual Estimate Approximate	1223 · Figure 5 · Figure 5I

NIR-light-driven photocatalytic CO2 reduction

TBML-MOF crystals · Single Crystal

same conditions as TNP-MOF series comparison

Context: pristine MOF
Measurement source: 1223 · Figure 5 · Figure 5H

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
HCOO- amount after 12 h NIR	~0.66 μmol	—	—	Visual Estimate Approximate	1223 · Figure 5 · Figure 5H
TOF per cell formula unit	~0.43 h-1	—	—	Visual Estimate Approximate	1223 · Figure 5 · Figure 5I

NIR-light-driven photocatalytic CO2 reduction

TML-MOF crystals · Single Crystal

same conditions as TNP-MOF series comparison

Context: pristine MOF
Measurement source: 1223 · Figure 5 · Figure 5H

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
AQE at 760 nm	0.141 %	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	S85 · Section 6 · Table S17
HCOO- amount after 12 h NIR	~3.11 μmol	—	—	Visual Estimate Approximate	1223 · Figure 5 · Figure 5H
CO2 conversion rate at 760 nm	459.2 μmol g-1 h-1	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	S85 · Section 6 · Table S17
TOF per cell formula unit	~2.03 h-1	—	—	Visual Estimate Approximate	1223 · Figure 5 · Figure 5I

NIR-light-driven photocatalytic CO2 reduction

TM-MOF crystals · Single Crystal

same conditions as TNP-MOF series comparison

Context: pristine MOF
Measurement source: 1223 · Figure 5 · Figure 5H

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
AQE at 760 nm	0.185 %	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	S85 · Section 6 · Table S17
HCOO- amount after 12 h NIR	~4.09 μmol	—	—	Visual Estimate Approximate	1223 · Figure 5 · Figure 5H
CO2 conversion rate at 760 nm	604.1 μmol g-1 h-1	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	S85 · Section 6 · Table S17
TOF per cell formula unit	~2.87 h-1	—	—	Visual Estimate Approximate	1223 · Figure 5 · Figure 5I

NIR-light-driven photocatalytic CO2 reduction

TNP-MOF crystals · Single Crystal

gas-liquid-solid reactor; acetonitrile/TEOA 50 mM; catalyst 10 µg/mL; CO2 pre-degassed; 300 W Xe lamp, 730-cut filter; 14.5 mW cm-2

Atmosphere: CO2
Context: pristine MOF
Measurement source: S71-S82 · Section 6 NIR-light-driven CO2 photoreduction experiments · Figures S64-S68; Tables S10-S15

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
HCOO- amount after 12 h NIRMarked as a best value within this paper	~44.9 μmol	—	—	Visual Estimate Approximate	1223 · Figure 5 · Figure 5H
TNP linker HCOO- amount after 12 h	4.26 μmol	—	—	Text Exact Reported	1224 · NIR-Light-Driven CO2Reduction Performance · Figure 5H
AQE at ca. 730 nm	~2.78 %	—	—	Visual Estimate Approximate	1223 · Figure 5 · Figure 5G
AQE at 760 nmMarked as a best value within this paper	2.03 %	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	S85 · Section 6 · Table S17
AQE at 808 nmMarked as a best value within this paper	1.11 %	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	S85 · Section 6 · Table S17
CO under NIR	0 %	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	S82 · Section 6 · Table S14
H2 under NIR	0 %	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	S82 · Section 6 · Table S15
HCOO- generation rate under λ≥730 nmMarked as a best value within this paper	6630 ± 242 μmol h-1 g-1	—	± 242 μmol h^-1 g^-1	Text Exact Reported	1228 · Conclusions · Figure 5; Table S16
CO2 conversion rate at 760 nm	6480 μmol g-1 h-1	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	S85 · Section 6 · Table S17
CO2 conversion rate at 808 nm	3444 μmol g-1 h-1	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	S85 · Section 6 · Table S17
HCOO- conversion rate in MOF comparisonMarked as a best value within this paper	6630 μmol g-1 h-1	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	S84 · Section 6 · Table S16
TOF per cell formula unitMarked as a best value within this paper	~34.2 h-1	—	—	Visual Estimate Approximate	1223 · Figure 5 · Figure 5I

transient photocurrent response

Photoresponse and photoelectrochemistry

TNP-MOF-coated ITO electrode · Electrode

sample-coated ITO, Pt counter, Ag/AgCl reference, Nafion binder; chopped visible/NIR light; no extra bias

Context: MOF/Nafion/ITO electrode
Measurement source: 1222 · Optoelectronic Property Characterization of MOFs · Figure 4C

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
NIR photocurrent response	fast, uniform and reversible photocurrent under NIR light	—	—	Text Qualitative	1224 · Optoelectronic Property Characterization of MOFs · Figure 4C

Tauc plot and Mott-Schottky analysis

UV-visible and optical absorption spectroscopy Mott-Schottky analysis

TNP-MOF crystals · Single Crystal

Mott-Schottky in 0.2 M Na2SO4; Tauc plot for band gap

Context: pristine MOF
Measurement source: 1224 · Optoelectronic Property Characterization of MOFs · Figure 4D,E

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
band gap	1.54 eV	—	—	Text Rounded Reported	1224 · Optoelectronic Property Characterization of MOFs · Figure 4D,E
conduction band	-0.79 V vs NHE	—	—	Text Rounded Reported	1224 · Optoelectronic Property Characterization of MOFs · Figure 4D,E
flat-band potential	-0.99 V vs Ag/AgCl	—	—	Text Rounded Reported	1224 · Optoelectronic Property Characterization of MOFs · Figure 4D,E
valence band	0.75 V vs NHE	—	—	Calculated From Reported Rounded Reported	1224 · Optoelectronic Property Characterization of MOFs · Figure 4D,E