Zhang J., Xu C., Li J. et al. · Vacuum · 2023 · 111937
Open a family to keep every result attached to its sample, method and conditions.
Paraphrased for this database from the authors’ stated interpretations — never quoted verbatim — and kept separate from reported measurements.
Cu7, prepared with 0.5 mL DMF for 12 h, was identified as the best near-linear resistive temperature sensor sample, with TCR -0.0157 deg C^-1 and low resistance.
Caveat: Table 2 reports Cu12 minimum resistance endpoint as 0.104 kOhm, slightly below Cu7 0.106 kOhm, although the abstract/conclusion emphasise Cu7 as the minimum/optimal sample.
main p.1 · Abstract · Linked to 3 structured results
In two-week repeated temperature-sensing tests, Cu7 showed weaker attenuation than Ni3 and was described as having excellent cyclic stability.
Caveat: The SI provides plotted curves rather than tabulated day-by-day stability values; endpoint range is a visual estimate from a small rendered figure.
main p.8 · 3.2.3 Effect of solvent ratio · Fig. S2 · Linked to 3 structured results
Ni3(HHTP)2 and Cu3(HHTP)2 conductive MOF nanorods were synthesised by a one-pot hydrothermal method and confirmed by SEM, XRD and XPS.
Caveat: Representative Cu/Ni samples for XRD/XPS are inferred from context; the local SI file was unreadable.
main p.8 · 4. Conclusion · Linked to 5 structured results
Short reaction time leaves particle-rich samples with weaker electrical/thermal conductivity, while 12 h reactions form nanorod-rich samples with improved thermal sensitivity; overly long reactions degrade nanorod morphology.
Caveat: Morphology-performance link is argued qualitatively; no carrier mobility or conductivity values are reported.
main p.7 · 3.2.3 Effect of solvent ratio · Fig. 7 · Linked to 4 structured results
All Ni/Cu M3(HHTP)2 sensors behave as negative temperature coefficient thermistors with near-linear resistance-temperature response over 20-80 deg C.
Caveat: The paper uses RVR-T fitting/R2 values rather than independent thermistor modelling.
main p.5 · 3.2.1 Effect of reaction time · Fig. 6 · Linked to 3 structured results
Names and aliases are kept exactly within the paper’s own identity model.
| Material | Composition | Structure context | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cu3(HHTP)2 conductive MOF nanorodsBrowse family: Cu₃(HHTP)₂ / Cu–HHTP | Cu3(HHTP)2Cu nodes; Cu 2p XPS assigned to Cu(I) and Cu(II) centres. · 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexahydroxytriphenylene (HHTP) | 2D · PristineConjugated hexagonal M3(HHTP)2 lattice with slipped-parallel ab-plane stacking; synthesised as 1D nanorod-like MOF powder. | main p.4 · 3.1 Synthesis and characterization · Fig. 4; Fig. 5 |
| Ni3(HHTP)2 conductive MOF nanorodsBrowse family: Ni₃(HHTP)₂ / Ni–HHTP | Ni3(HHTP)2Ni nodes; Ni present as Ni2+ by Ni 2p XPS. · 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexahydroxytriphenylene (HHTP) | 2D · PristineConjugated hexagonal M3(HHTP)2 lattice stacked along the c axis; synthesised as 1D nanorod-like MOF powder. | main p.3 · 3.1 Synthesis and characterization · Fig. 1; Fig. 4; Fig. 5 |
Sample form, processing state and composition status define the context for measurements.
| Sample | Form and role | Processing and geometry | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cu1research_0869__mat__cu3_hhtp2 | Powder · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | Cu(CH3COO)2.H2O 39 mg; HHTP 35 mg; water 7 mL; DMF 0.25 mL; 80 deg C; 3 h; sensor fabricated by spraying 200 uL dispersion on interdigital electrodes at 80 deg C.Interdigital electrode on glass slide for sensing after powder dispersion spraying; none for as-synthesised powder characterisation. | main p.3 · Table 1 / sensor fabrication · Table 1; Fig. 3 |
| Cu10research_0869__mat__cu3_hhtp2 | Powder · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | Cu(CH3COO)2.H2O 39 mg; HHTP 35 mg; water 7 mL; DMF 0.75 mL; 80 deg C; 6 h; sensor fabricated by spraying 200 uL dispersion on interdigital electrodes at 80 deg C.Interdigital electrode on glass slide for sensing after powder dispersion spraying; none for as-synthesised powder characterisation. | main p.3 · Table 1 / sensor fabrication · Table 1; Fig. 3 |
| Cu11research_0869__mat__cu3_hhtp2 | Powder · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | Cu(CH3COO)2.H2O 39 mg; HHTP 35 mg; water 7 mL; DMF 0.75 mL; 80 deg C; 12 h; sensor fabricated by spraying 200 uL dispersion on interdigital electrodes at 80 deg C.Interdigital electrode on glass slide for sensing after powder dispersion spraying; none for as-synthesised powder characterisation. | main p.3 · Table 1 / sensor fabrication · Table 1; Fig. 3 |
| Cu12research_0869__mat__cu3_hhtp2 | Powder · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | Cu(CH3COO)2.H2O 39 mg; HHTP 35 mg; water 7 mL; DMF 0.75 mL; 80 deg C; 24 h; sensor fabricated by spraying 200 uL dispersion on interdigital electrodes at 80 deg C.Interdigital electrode on glass slide for sensing after powder dispersion spraying; none for as-synthesised powder characterisation. | main p.3 · Table 1 / sensor fabrication · Table 1; Fig. 3 |
| Cu2research_0869__mat__cu3_hhtp2 | Powder · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | Cu(CH3COO)2.H2O 39 mg; HHTP 35 mg; water 7 mL; DMF 0.25 mL; 80 deg C; 6 h; sensor fabricated by spraying 200 uL dispersion on interdigital electrodes at 80 deg C.Interdigital electrode on glass slide for sensing after powder dispersion spraying; none for as-synthesised powder characterisation. | main p.3 · Table 1 / sensor fabrication · Table 1; Fig. 3 |
| Cu3research_0869__mat__cu3_hhtp2 | Powder · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | Cu(CH3COO)2.H2O 39 mg; HHTP 35 mg; water 7 mL; DMF 0.25 mL; 80 deg C; 12 h; sensor fabricated by spraying 200 uL dispersion on interdigital electrodes at 80 deg C.Interdigital electrode on glass slide for sensing after powder dispersion spraying; none for as-synthesised powder characterisation. | main p.4 · Table 1 / sensor fabrication · Fig. 3; Table 1 |
| Cu4research_0869__mat__cu3_hhtp2 | Powder · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | Cu(CH3COO)2.H2O 39 mg; HHTP 35 mg; water 7 mL; DMF 0.25 mL; 80 deg C; 24 h; sensor fabricated by spraying 200 uL dispersion on interdigital electrodes at 80 deg C.Interdigital electrode on glass slide for sensing after powder dispersion spraying; none for as-synthesised powder characterisation. | main p.4 · Table 1 / sensor fabrication · Fig. 3; Table 1 |
| Cu5research_0869__mat__cu3_hhtp2 | Powder · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | Cu(CH3COO)2.H2O 39 mg; HHTP 35 mg; water 7 mL; DMF 0.50 mL; 80 deg C; 3 h; sensor fabricated by spraying 200 uL dispersion on interdigital electrodes at 80 deg C.Interdigital electrode on glass slide for sensing after powder dispersion spraying; none for as-synthesised powder characterisation. | main p.3 · Table 1 / sensor fabrication · Table 1; Fig. 3 |
| Cu6research_0869__mat__cu3_hhtp2 | Powder · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | Cu(CH3COO)2.H2O 39 mg; HHTP 35 mg; water 7 mL; DMF 0.50 mL; 80 deg C; 6 h; sensor fabricated by spraying 200 uL dispersion on interdigital electrodes at 80 deg C.Interdigital electrode on glass slide for sensing after powder dispersion spraying; none for as-synthesised powder characterisation. | main p.3 · Table 1 / sensor fabrication · Table 1; Fig. 3 |
| Cu7research_0869__mat__cu3_hhtp2 | Powder · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | Cu(CH3COO)2.H2O 39 mg; HHTP 35 mg; water 7 mL; DMF 0.50 mL; 80 deg C; 12 h; sensor fabricated by spraying 200 uL dispersion on interdigital electrodes at 80 deg C.Interdigital electrode on glass slide for sensing after powder dispersion spraying; none for as-synthesised powder characterisation. | main p.3 · Table 1 / sensor fabrication · Table 1; Abstract |
| Cu8research_0869__mat__cu3_hhtp2 | Powder · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | Cu(CH3COO)2.H2O 39 mg; HHTP 35 mg; water 7 mL; DMF 0.50 mL; 80 deg C; 24 h; sensor fabricated by spraying 200 uL dispersion on interdigital electrodes at 80 deg C.Interdigital electrode on glass slide for sensing after powder dispersion spraying; none for as-synthesised powder characterisation. | main p.3 · Table 1 / sensor fabrication · Table 1; Fig. 3 |
| Cu9research_0869__mat__cu3_hhtp2 | Powder · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | Cu(CH3COO)2.H2O 39 mg; HHTP 35 mg; water 7 mL; DMF 0.75 mL; 80 deg C; 3 h; sensor fabricated by spraying 200 uL dispersion on interdigital electrodes at 80 deg C.Interdigital electrode on glass slide for sensing after powder dispersion spraying; none for as-synthesised powder characterisation. | main p.3 · Table 1 / sensor fabrication · Table 1; Fig. 3 |
| Ni1research_0869__mat__ni3_hhtp2 | Powder · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | Ni(CH3COO)2.4H2O 114 mg; HHTP 50 mg; dioxane total volume 7 mL; 80 deg C; 3 h; sensor fabricated by spraying 200 uL dispersion on interdigital electrodes at 80 deg C.Interdigital electrode on glass slide for sensing after powder dispersion spraying; none for as-synthesised powder characterisation. | main p.3 · Table 1 / sensor fabrication · Table 1; Fig. 2 |
| Ni2research_0869__mat__ni3_hhtp2 | Powder · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | Ni(CH3COO)2.4H2O 114 mg; HHTP 50 mg; dioxane total volume 7 mL; 80 deg C; 6 h; sensor fabricated by spraying 200 uL dispersion on interdigital electrodes at 80 deg C.Interdigital electrode on glass slide for sensing after powder dispersion spraying; none for as-synthesised powder characterisation. | main p.3 · Table 1 / sensor fabrication · Table 1; Fig. 2 |
| Ni3research_0869__mat__ni3_hhtp2 | Powder · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | Ni(CH3COO)2.4H2O 114 mg; HHTP 50 mg; dioxane total volume 7 mL; 80 deg C; 12 h; sensor fabricated by spraying 200 uL dispersion on interdigital electrodes at 80 deg C.Interdigital electrode on glass slide for sensing after powder dispersion spraying; none for as-synthesised powder characterisation. | main p.3 · Table 1 / sensor fabrication · Table 1; Fig. 2 |
| Ni4research_0869__mat__ni3_hhtp2 | Powder · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | Ni(CH3COO)2.4H2O 114 mg; HHTP 50 mg; dioxane total volume 7 mL; 80 deg C; 24 h; sensor fabricated by spraying 200 uL dispersion on interdigital electrodes at 80 deg C.Interdigital electrode on glass slide for sensing after powder dispersion spraying; none for as-synthesised powder characterisation. | main p.3 · Table 1 / sensor fabrication · Table 1; Fig. 2 |