Sensing Application — Controlled synthesis of Cu-/Ni-based 1D c-MOFs and their application in near-linear temperature sensing

Measurement evidence

Sensing Application

Controlled synthesis of Cu-/Ni-based 1D c-MOFs and their application in near-linear temperature sensing · Zhang J., Xu C., Li J. et al. · Vacuum · 2023 · 111937

18 measurement groups · 86 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

Two-week repeated resistive temperature-sensing test

Cu7 · Powder

Relative resistance versus measured temperature recorded after 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 14 days for Cu7-based MOF sensor.

Atmosphere: not reported
Geometry: Interdigital electrode temperature sensor prepared by spraying MOF dispersion, as in main text sensor fabrication.
Context: pristine Cu3(HHTP)2 powder sensor (Cu7)
Measurement source: SI rendered p.2 · Supplementary information · Fig. S2b

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
visual endpoint range at 80 deg C over repeated testsMarked as a best value within this paper	approximately 78-86% DeltaR/R0 at 80 deg C across 1-14 day traces	—	visual range ca. 78-86%	Visual Estimate Approximate	SI rendered p.2 · Supplementary information · Fig. S2b
repeatability test duration	2 weeks; 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 14 days	—	—	Caption Exact Reported	main p.8 · 3.2.3 Effect of solvent ratio · Fig. S2
repeatability trend with testing daysMarked as a best value within this paper	relatively weak signs of attenuation; excellent cyclic stability	—	—	Text Qualitative	main p.8 · 3.2.3 Effect of solvent ratio · Fig. S2b

Two-week repeated resistive temperature-sensing test

Ni3 · Powder

Relative resistance versus measured temperature recorded after 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 14 days for Ni3-based MOF sensor.

Atmosphere: not reported
Geometry: Interdigital electrode temperature sensor prepared by spraying MOF dispersion, as in main text sensor fabrication.
Context: pristine Ni3(HHTP)2 powder sensor
Measurement source: SI rendered p.2 · Supplementary information · Fig. S2a

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
visual endpoint range at 80 deg C over repeated tests	approximately 65-70% DeltaR/R0 at 80 deg C across 1-14 day traces	—	visual range ca. 65-70%	Visual Estimate Approximate	SI rendered p.2 · Supplementary information · Fig. S2a
repeatability test duration	2 weeks; 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 14 days	—	—	Caption Exact Reported	main p.8 · 3.2.3 Effect of solvent ratio · Fig. S2
repeatability trend with testing days	conspicuous attenuation trend with increasing testing days	—	—	Text Qualitative	main p.8 · 3.2.3 Effect of solvent ratio · Fig. S2a

Resistive temperature sensing; RVR and TCR calculated from resistance-temperature curves

Cu1 · Powder

Interdigital electrodes fixed on slide, heated table at 80 deg C during spraying; 200 uL dispersion sprayed; response measured from 20 to 80 deg C at 5 deg C intervals.

Atmosphere: ambient air; atmosphere not otherwise specified
Geometry: Sprayed MOF dispersion on interdigital electrodes/glass slide; two-terminal resistance readout.
Context: pristine framework sensor/material
Measurement source: main p.2 and p.6 · 2.5 Sensor fabrication and research; Table 2 · Table 2; Fig. 6; Fig. 7

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
linear-fit R squared for RVR-temperature curve	0.8311	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
maximum resistance in reported range	108	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
minimum resistance in reported range	30	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
relative variation of resistance over 20-80 deg C	72.2%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
temperature coefficient of resistance	-0.012	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2

Resistive temperature sensing; RVR and TCR calculated from resistance-temperature curves

Cu10 · Powder

Interdigital electrodes fixed on slide, heated table at 80 deg C during spraying; 200 uL dispersion sprayed; response measured from 20 to 80 deg C at 5 deg C intervals.

Atmosphere: ambient air; atmosphere not otherwise specified
Geometry: Sprayed MOF dispersion on interdigital electrodes/glass slide; two-terminal resistance readout.
Context: pristine framework sensor/material
Measurement source: main p.2 and p.6 · 2.5 Sensor fabrication and research; Table 2 · Table 2; Fig. 6; Fig. 7

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
linear-fit R squared for RVR-temperature curve	0.9829	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
maximum resistance in reported range	45.3	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
minimum resistance in reported range	12.6	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
relative variation of resistance over 20-80 deg C	77.1%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
temperature coefficient of resistance	-0.012	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2

Resistive temperature sensing; RVR and TCR calculated from resistance-temperature curves

Cu11 · Powder

Interdigital electrodes fixed on slide, heated table at 80 deg C during spraying; 200 uL dispersion sprayed; response measured from 20 to 80 deg C at 5 deg C intervals.

Atmosphere: ambient air; atmosphere not otherwise specified
Geometry: Sprayed MOF dispersion on interdigital electrodes/glass slide; two-terminal resistance readout.
Context: pristine framework sensor/material
Measurement source: main p.2 and p.6 · 2.5 Sensor fabrication and research; Table 2 · Table 2; Fig. 6; Fig. 7

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
linear-fit R squared for RVR-temperature curveMarked as a best value within this paper	0.9998	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
maximum resistance in reported range	0.728	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
minimum resistance in reported range	0.167	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
relative variation of resistance over 20-80 deg C	72.2%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
temperature coefficient of resistance	-0.0128	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2

Resistive temperature sensing; RVR and TCR calculated from resistance-temperature curves

Cu12 · Powder

Interdigital electrodes fixed on slide, heated table at 80 deg C during spraying; 200 uL dispersion sprayed; response measured from 20 to 80 deg C at 5 deg C intervals.

Atmosphere: ambient air; atmosphere not otherwise specified
Geometry: Sprayed MOF dispersion on interdigital electrodes/glass slide; two-terminal resistance readout.
Context: pristine framework sensor/material
Measurement source: main p.2 and p.6 · 2.5 Sensor fabrication and research; Table 2 · Table 2; Fig. 6; Fig. 7

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
linear-fit R squared for RVR-temperature curve	0.995	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
maximum resistance in reported range	0.993	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
minimum resistance in reported range	0.104	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
relative variation of resistance over 20-80 deg C	89.5%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
temperature coefficient of resistance	-0.0149	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2

Resistive temperature sensing; RVR and TCR calculated from resistance-temperature curves

Cu2 · Powder

Interdigital electrodes fixed on slide, heated table at 80 deg C during spraying; 200 uL dispersion sprayed; response measured from 20 to 80 deg C at 5 deg C intervals.

Atmosphere: ambient air; atmosphere not otherwise specified
Geometry: Sprayed MOF dispersion on interdigital electrodes/glass slide; two-terminal resistance readout.
Context: pristine framework sensor/material
Measurement source: main p.2 and p.6 · 2.5 Sensor fabrication and research; Table 2 · Table 2; Fig. 6; Fig. 7

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
linear-fit R squared for RVR-temperature curve	0.9974	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
maximum resistance in reported range	305	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
minimum resistance in reported range	36	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
relative variation of resistance over 20-80 deg C	88.2%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
temperature coefficient of resistance	-0.0147	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2

Resistive temperature sensing; RVR and TCR calculated from resistance-temperature curves

Cu3 · Powder

Interdigital electrodes fixed on slide, heated table at 80 deg C during spraying; 200 uL dispersion sprayed; response measured from 20 to 80 deg C at 5 deg C intervals.

Atmosphere: ambient air; atmosphere not otherwise specified
Geometry: Sprayed MOF dispersion on interdigital electrodes/glass slide; two-terminal resistance readout.
Context: pristine framework sensor/material
Measurement source: main p.2 and p.6 · 2.5 Sensor fabrication and research; Table 2 · Table 2; Fig. 6; Fig. 7

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
linear-fit R squared for RVR-temperature curve	0.9954	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
maximum resistance in reported range	1.38	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
minimum resistance in reported range	0.126	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
relative variation of resistance over 20-80 deg C	90.9%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
temperature coefficient of resistance	-0.0151	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2

Resistive temperature sensing; RVR and TCR calculated from resistance-temperature curves

Cu4 · Powder

Interdigital electrodes fixed on slide, heated table at 80 deg C during spraying; 200 uL dispersion sprayed; response measured from 20 to 80 deg C at 5 deg C intervals.

Atmosphere: ambient air; atmosphere not otherwise specified
Geometry: Sprayed MOF dispersion on interdigital electrodes/glass slide; two-terminal resistance readout.
Context: pristine framework sensor/material
Measurement source: main p.2 and p.6 · 2.5 Sensor fabrication and research; Table 2 · Table 2; Fig. 6; Fig. 7

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
linear-fit R squared for RVR-temperature curve	0.9969	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
maximum resistance in reported range	2.2	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
minimum resistance in reported range	0.199	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
relative variation of resistance over 20-80 deg C	91.0%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
temperature coefficient of resistance	-0.0152	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2

Resistive temperature sensing; RVR and TCR calculated from resistance-temperature curves

Cu5 · Powder

Interdigital electrodes fixed on slide, heated table at 80 deg C during spraying; 200 uL dispersion sprayed; response measured from 20 to 80 deg C at 5 deg C intervals.

Atmosphere: ambient air; atmosphere not otherwise specified
Geometry: Sprayed MOF dispersion on interdigital electrodes/glass slide; two-terminal resistance readout.
Context: pristine framework sensor/material
Measurement source: main p.2 and p.6 · 2.5 Sensor fabrication and research; Table 2 · Table 2; Fig. 6; Fig. 7

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
linear-fit R squared for RVR-temperature curve	0.825	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
maximum resistance in reported range	440	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
minimum resistance in reported range	26	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
relative variation of resistance over 20-80 deg C	73.4%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
temperature coefficient of resistance	-0.012	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2

Resistive temperature sensing; RVR and TCR calculated from resistance-temperature curves

Cu6 · Powder

Interdigital electrodes fixed on slide, heated table at 80 deg C during spraying; 200 uL dispersion sprayed; response measured from 20 to 80 deg C at 5 deg C intervals.

Atmosphere: ambient air; atmosphere not otherwise specified
Geometry: Sprayed MOF dispersion on interdigital electrodes/glass slide; two-terminal resistance readout.
Context: pristine framework sensor/material
Measurement source: main p.2 and p.6 · 2.5 Sensor fabrication and research; Table 2 · Table 2; Fig. 6; Fig. 7

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
linear-fit R squared for RVR-temperature curve	0.9859	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
maximum resistance in reported range	25.1	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
minimum resistance in reported range	2.91	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
relative variation of resistance over 20-80 deg CMarked as a best value within this paper	94.1%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
temperature coefficient of resistance	-0.0143	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2

Resistive temperature sensing; RVR and TCR calculated from resistance-temperature curves

Cu7 · Powder

Interdigital electrodes fixed on slide, heated table at 80 deg C during spraying; 200 uL dispersion sprayed; response measured from 20 to 80 deg C at 5 deg C intervals.

Atmosphere: ambient air; atmosphere not otherwise specified
Geometry: Sprayed MOF dispersion on interdigital electrodes/glass slide; two-terminal resistance readout.
Context: pristine framework sensor/material
Measurement source: main p.2 and p.6 · 2.5 Sensor fabrication and research; Table 2 · Table 2; Fig. 6; Fig. 7

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
linear-fit R squared for RVR-temperature curve	0.9743	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
maximum resistance in reported range	0.752	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
minimum resistance in reported range	0.106	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
relative variation of resistance over 20-80 deg C	85.9%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
temperature coefficient of resistanceMarked as a best value within this paper	-0.0157	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2

Resistive temperature sensing; RVR and TCR calculated from resistance-temperature curves

Cu8 · Powder

Interdigital electrodes fixed on slide, heated table at 80 deg C during spraying; 200 uL dispersion sprayed; response measured from 20 to 80 deg C at 5 deg C intervals.

Atmosphere: ambient air; atmosphere not otherwise specified
Geometry: Sprayed MOF dispersion on interdigital electrodes/glass slide; two-terminal resistance readout.
Context: pristine framework sensor/material
Measurement source: main p.2 and p.6 · 2.5 Sensor fabrication and research; Table 2 · Table 2; Fig. 6; Fig. 7

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
linear-fit R squared for RVR-temperature curve	0.9799	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
maximum resistance in reported range	1.92	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
minimum resistance in reported range	0.51	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
relative variation of resistance over 20-80 deg C	88.4%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
temperature coefficient of resistance	-0.0147	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2

Resistive temperature sensing; RVR and TCR calculated from resistance-temperature curves

Cu9 · Powder

Interdigital electrodes fixed on slide, heated table at 80 deg C during spraying; 200 uL dispersion sprayed; response measured from 20 to 80 deg C at 5 deg C intervals.

Atmosphere: ambient air; atmosphere not otherwise specified
Geometry: Sprayed MOF dispersion on interdigital electrodes/glass slide; two-terminal resistance readout.
Context: pristine framework sensor/material
Measurement source: main p.2 and p.6 · 2.5 Sensor fabrication and research; Table 2 · Table 2; Fig. 6; Fig. 7

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
linear-fit R squared for RVR-temperature curve	0.9911	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
maximum resistance in reported range	61.8	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
minimum resistance in reported range	44.3	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
relative variation of resistance over 20-80 deg C	28.3%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
temperature coefficient of resistance	-0.00472	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2

Resistive temperature sensing; RVR and TCR calculated from resistance-temperature curves

Ni1 · Powder

Interdigital electrodes fixed on slide, heated table at 80 deg C during spraying; 200 uL dispersion sprayed; response measured from 20 to 80 deg C at 5 deg C intervals.

Atmosphere: ambient air; atmosphere not otherwise specified
Geometry: Sprayed MOF dispersion on interdigital electrodes/glass slide; two-terminal resistance readout.
Context: pristine framework sensor/material
Measurement source: main p.2 and p.6 · 2.5 Sensor fabrication and research; Table 2 · Table 2; Fig. 6; Fig. 7

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
linear-fit R squared for RVR-temperature curve	0.9773	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
maximum resistance in reported range	198	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
minimum resistance in reported range	117	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
relative variation of resistance over 20-80 deg C	40.9%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
temperature coefficient of resistance	-0.00682	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2

Resistive temperature sensing; RVR and TCR calculated from resistance-temperature curves

Ni2 · Powder

Interdigital electrodes fixed on slide, heated table at 80 deg C during spraying; 200 uL dispersion sprayed; response measured from 20 to 80 deg C at 5 deg C intervals.

Atmosphere: ambient air; atmosphere not otherwise specified
Geometry: Sprayed MOF dispersion on interdigital electrodes/glass slide; two-terminal resistance readout.
Context: pristine framework sensor/material
Measurement source: main p.2 and p.6 · 2.5 Sensor fabrication and research; Table 2 · Table 2; Fig. 6; Fig. 7

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
linear-fit R squared for RVR-temperature curve	0.9508	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
maximum resistance in reported range	65	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
minimum resistance in reported range	16	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
relative variation of resistance over 20-80 deg C	75.4%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
temperature coefficient of resistance	-0.0119	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2

Resistive temperature sensing; RVR and TCR calculated from resistance-temperature curves

Ni3 · Powder

Interdigital electrodes fixed on slide, heated table at 80 deg C during spraying; 200 uL dispersion sprayed; response measured from 20 to 80 deg C at 5 deg C intervals.

Atmosphere: ambient air; atmosphere not otherwise specified
Geometry: Sprayed MOF dispersion on interdigital electrodes/glass slide; two-terminal resistance readout.
Context: pristine framework sensor/material
Measurement source: main p.2 and p.6 · 2.5 Sensor fabrication and research; Table 2 · Table 2; Fig. 6; Fig. 7

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
linear-fit R squared for RVR-temperature curve	0.9856	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
maximum resistance in reported range	71.1	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
minimum resistance in reported range	20.5	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
relative variation of resistance over 20-80 deg C	71.2%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
temperature coefficient of resistance	-0.0126	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2

Resistive temperature sensing; RVR and TCR calculated from resistance-temperature curves

Ni4 · Powder

Interdigital electrodes fixed on slide, heated table at 80 deg C during spraying; 200 uL dispersion sprayed; response measured from 20 to 80 deg C at 5 deg C intervals.

Atmosphere: ambient air; atmosphere not otherwise specified
Geometry: Sprayed MOF dispersion on interdigital electrodes/glass slide; two-terminal resistance readout.
Context: pristine framework sensor/material
Measurement source: main p.2 and p.6 · 2.5 Sensor fabrication and research; Table 2 · Table 2; Fig. 6; Fig. 7

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
linear-fit R squared for RVR-temperature curve	0.9685	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
maximum resistance in reported range	101	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
minimum resistance in reported range	21	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
relative variation of resistance over 20-80 deg C	73.3%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2
temperature coefficient of resistance	-0.0122	—	—	Table Exact Reported	main p.6 · Table 2 · Table 2