This family merges chemical shorthand and formula variants only after verification against source articles. Per-paper composition and phase details remain separate below.
Paper counts are material-linked through samples and measurements; technique groups are not value rankings.
Distinct primary papers in this browse group by publication year.
Filter the material-linked paper set while keeping every result in its original dossier.
2 papers
Liu M., Zhao J., Dong H. et al. · Small · 2024
Reported here: Ni1.6Cu1.4(HITP)2 conductive MOF film · Ni2.1Cu0.9(HITP)2 conductive MOF film · Ni2.3Cu0.7(HITP)2 conductive MOF film
Chen T., Dou J.-H., Yang L. et al. · Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2020
Reported here: (Cu0.50Ni2.50)(HITP)2 · (Cu1.17Ni1.83)(HITP)2 · (Cu1.39Ni1.61)(HITP)2 · (Cu1.63Ni1.37)(HITP)2 · (Cu2.32Ni0.68)(HITP)2
No linked paper matches these filters.
Raw names, formulas and structural assignments remain separate; no consensus value is inferred.
| Paper and reported name | Formula and components | Structure context | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ni1.6Cu1.4(HITP)2 conductive MOF film2024 · Electrodeposition of Ni/Cu Bimetallic Conductive Metal–Organic Frameworks Electrocatalysts with Boosted Oxygen Reduction Activity for Zinc–Air Batteries | Ni1.6Cu1.4(HITP)2Mixed Ni/Cu metal centres coordinated by HITP N atoms · 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenylene (HITP) | 2D · PristineLayered bimetallic 2D conductive M3(HITP)2 film; actual Ni/Cu ratio corresponds to 1/1 feed. | 5 · 2.1 Material Design and Structural Characterization · Table S1 cited |
| Ni2.1Cu0.9(HITP)2 conductive MOF film2024 · Electrodeposition of Ni/Cu Bimetallic Conductive Metal–Organic Frameworks Electrocatalysts with Boosted Oxygen Reduction Activity for Zinc–Air Batteries | Ni2.1Cu0.9(HITP)2Mixed Ni/Cu metal centres coordinated by HITP N atoms; Ni/Cu-N4 bimetallic centres · 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenylene (HITP) | 2D · PristineLayered bimetallic 2D conductive MOF film with XRD peaks at 4.6 and 27.3 degrees assigned to (100) and (001) planes. | 2 · 2.1 Material Design and Structural Characterization · Figure 1b |
| Ni2.3Cu0.7(HITP)2 conductive MOF film2024 · Electrodeposition of Ni/Cu Bimetallic Conductive Metal–Organic Frameworks Electrocatalysts with Boosted Oxygen Reduction Activity for Zinc–Air Batteries | Ni2.3Cu0.7(HITP)2Mixed Ni/Cu metal centres coordinated by HITP N atoms · 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenylene (HITP) | 2D · PristineLayered bimetallic 2D conductive M3(HITP)2 film; actual Ni/Cu ratio corresponds to 3/1 feed. | 5 · 2.1 Material Design and Structural Characterization · Table S1 cited |
| (Cu0.50Ni2.50)(HITP)22020 · Continuous Electrical Conductivity Variation in M3(Hexaiminotriphenylene)2(M = Co, Ni, Cu) MOF Alloys | Cu0.50Ni2.50(HITP)2Cu0.50 · HITP = 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenylene | 2D · PristineLayered electrically conducting MOF; synchrotron PXRD Pawley refinements fit orthorhombic Cmcm for pure M3(HITP)2; alloys are isostructural solid solutions following Vegard-type trends. | 12369-12370 · Results and Discussion · Figures 2b, 5; Table S5 |
| (Cu1.17Ni1.83)(HITP)22020 · Continuous Electrical Conductivity Variation in M3(Hexaiminotriphenylene)2(M = Co, Ni, Cu) MOF Alloys | Cu1.17Ni1.83(HITP)2Cu1.17 · HITP = 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenylene | 2D · PristineLayered electrically conducting MOF; synchrotron PXRD Pawley refinements fit orthorhombic Cmcm for pure M3(HITP)2; alloys are isostructural solid solutions following Vegard-type trends. | 12369-12370 · Results and Discussion · Figures 2b, 5; Table S5 |
| (Cu1.39Ni1.61)(HITP)22020 · Continuous Electrical Conductivity Variation in M3(Hexaiminotriphenylene)2(M = Co, Ni, Cu) MOF Alloys | Cu1.39Ni1.61(HITP)2Cu1.39 · HITP = 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenylene | 2D · PristineLayered electrically conducting MOF; synchrotron PXRD Pawley refinements fit orthorhombic Cmcm for pure M3(HITP)2; alloys are isostructural solid solutions following Vegard-type trends. | 12369-12370 · Results and Discussion · Figures 2b, 5; Table S5 |
| (Cu1.63Ni1.37)(HITP)22020 · Continuous Electrical Conductivity Variation in M3(Hexaiminotriphenylene)2(M = Co, Ni, Cu) MOF Alloys | Cu1.63Ni1.37(HITP)2Cu1.63 · HITP = 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenylene | 2D · PristineLayered electrically conducting MOF; synchrotron PXRD Pawley refinements fit orthorhombic Cmcm for pure M3(HITP)2; alloys are isostructural solid solutions following Vegard-type trends. | 12369-12370 · Results and Discussion · Figures 2b, 5; Table S5 |
| (Cu2.32Ni0.68)(HITP)22020 · Continuous Electrical Conductivity Variation in M3(Hexaiminotriphenylene)2(M = Co, Ni, Cu) MOF Alloys | Cu2.32Ni0.68(HITP)2Cu2.32 · HITP = 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenylene | 2D · PristineLayered electrically conducting MOF; synchrotron PXRD Pawley refinements fit orthorhombic Cmcm for pure M3(HITP)2; alloys are isostructural solid solutions following Vegard-type trends. | 12369-12370 · Results and Discussion · Figures 2b, 5; Table S5 |