Electrical Transport — Tuning the Structure-Property Relationships of Metallophthalocyanine-Based Two-Dimensional Conductive Metal-Organic Frameworks with Different Metal Linkages

7 measurement groups · 10 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

Four-contact probe DC conductivity on pressed pellet

Electrical conductivity

CuPc-O-Cu pressed pellet · Pellet

25-30 mg samples pressed into 6 x 6 mm pellets for 10 min at about 800 psi; four 25 um Au wire contacts with carbon paste; room-temperature conductivity from three synthetic batches.

Temperature: 300
Atmosphere: ambient / measurement fixture not further specified
Geometry: pressed pellet, four parallel gold-wire contacts
Context: pristine
Measurement source: SI p.43-46 · Section S15 Measurements of electrical conductivity · Figure S28; Table S8; Table S9

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
average room-temperature conductivity across repeated batchesMarked as a best value within this paper	8.7 (+/- 0.6) S m-1	—	+/- 0.6 S m-1	SI Table Exact Reported	SI p.44 · Section S15 Measurements of electrical conductivity · Table S8
room-temperature bulk electrical conductivityMarked as a best value within this paper	9.3 S m-1 at room temperature	—	—	Text Exact Reported	main p.7 · Results and Discussion · Figure 4; Table S9

Four-contact probe DC conductivity on pressed pellet

Electrical conductivity

CuPc(OH)8 pressed pellet · Pellet

Same pelletised four-contact probe method as MOF samples; room-temperature value reported in Table S8.

Temperature: 300
Geometry: pressed pellet
Context: pristine
Measurement source: SI p.44 · Section S15 Measurements of electrical conductivity · Table S8

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
room-temperature conductivity of monomer control	7.5 x 10-5 S m-1	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	SI p.44 · Section S15 Measurements of electrical conductivity · Table S8

Four-contact probe DC conductivity on pressed pellet

Electrical conductivity

CuPc-O-Ni pressed pellet · Pellet

25-30 mg samples pressed into 6 x 6 mm pellets for 10 min at about 800 psi; four 25 um Au wire contacts with carbon paste; room-temperature conductivity from three synthetic batches.

Temperature: 300
Atmosphere: ambient / measurement fixture not further specified
Geometry: pressed pellet, four parallel gold-wire contacts
Context: pristine
Measurement source: SI p.43-46 · Section S15 Measurements of electrical conductivity · Figure S28; Table S8; Table S9

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
average room-temperature conductivity across repeated batches	4.0 (+/- 0.53) S m-1	—	+/- 0.53 S m-1	SI Table Exact Reported	SI p.44 · Section S15 Measurements of electrical conductivity · Table S8
room-temperature bulk electrical conductivity	4.6 S m-1 at room temperature	—	—	Text Exact Reported	main p.7 · Results and Discussion · Figure 4; Table S9

Four-contact probe DC conductivity on pressed pellet

Electrical conductivity

CuPc-O-Zn pressed pellet · Pellet

25-30 mg samples pressed into 6 x 6 mm pellets for 10 min at about 800 psi; four 25 um Au wire contacts with carbon paste; room-temperature conductivity from three synthetic batches.

Temperature: 300
Atmosphere: ambient / measurement fixture not further specified
Geometry: pressed pellet, four parallel gold-wire contacts
Context: pristine
Measurement source: SI p.43-46 · Section S15 Measurements of electrical conductivity · Figure S28; Table S8; Table S9

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
average room-temperature conductivity across repeated batches	2.3 (+/- 0.67) S m-1	—	+/- 0.67 S m-1	SI Table Exact Reported	SI p.44 · Section S15 Measurements of electrical conductivity · Table S8
room-temperature bulk electrical conductivity	2.9 S m-1 at room temperature	—	—	Text Exact Reported	main p.7 · Results and Discussion · Figure 4; Table S9

Variable-temperature four-contact probe DC conductivity

Electrical conductivity

CuPc-O-Cu pressed pellet · Pellet

Measured in Quantum Design PPMS Dynacool liquid He cryostat; temperature varied from 300 K to 180 K at 2.5 K min-1; resistance measured every 2.5 K; Arrhenius fit for activation energy.

Temperature: 180-300
Atmosphere: liquid He cryostat
Geometry: pressed pellet, four-contact probe
Context: pristine
Measurement source: SI p.43-45 · Section S15 Measurements of electrical conductivity · Figure S29

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
Arrhenius activation energy	Ea = 73 meV	—	—	Text Exact Reported	main p.8 · Results and Discussion · Figure 4

Variable-temperature four-contact probe DC conductivity

Electrical conductivity

CuPc-O-Ni pressed pellet · Pellet

Measured in Quantum Design PPMS Dynacool liquid He cryostat; temperature varied from 300 K to 180 K at 2.5 K min-1; resistance measured every 2.5 K; Arrhenius fit for activation energy.

Temperature: 180-300
Atmosphere: liquid He cryostat
Geometry: pressed pellet, four-contact probe
Context: pristine
Measurement source: SI p.43-45 · Section S15 Measurements of electrical conductivity · Figure S29

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
Arrhenius activation energy	Ea = 81 meV	—	—	Text Exact Reported	main p.8 · Results and Discussion · Figure 4

Variable-temperature four-contact probe DC conductivity

Electrical conductivity

CuPc-O-Zn pressed pellet · Pellet

Measured in Quantum Design PPMS Dynacool liquid He cryostat; temperature varied from 300 K to 180 K at 2.5 K min-1; resistance measured every 2.5 K; Arrhenius fit for activation energy.

Temperature: 180-300
Atmosphere: liquid He cryostat
Geometry: pressed pellet, four-contact probe
Context: pristine
Measurement source: SI p.43-45 · Section S15 Measurements of electrical conductivity · Figure S29

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
Arrhenius activation energy	Ea = 53 meV	—	—	Text Exact Reported	main p.8 · Results and Discussion · Figure 4