Ma Z.-Z., Li Q.-H., Wang Z. et al. · Nature Communications · 2022 · 6347
Open a family to keep every result attached to its sample, method and conditions.
Paraphrased for this database from the authors’ stated interpretations — never quoted verbatim — and kept separate from reported measurements.
Applying 0-10 V across ITO-MOF-ITO devices increases the nonlinear absorption coefficient beta for both Cu-HHTP orientations, with a much larger increase for [001].
Caveat: Authors state high voltage can destroy the MOFs, limiting the studied range to 0-10 V.
5 · The third-order NLO test · Fig. 5d,e · Linked to 14 structured results
Cu-HHTP films with [001] and [100] orientations were successfully prepared on substrates, as supported by out-of-plane and in-plane XRD peak assignments.
Caveat: No CIF file was supplied in this extraction batch; assignment relies on reported XRD comparisons to simulated Cu-HHTP.
2 · Characterization · Fig. 2b · Linked to 4 structured results
The [001] orientation gives stronger nonlinear optical limiting than the [100] orientation at 0 V.
Caveat: Film thickness and linear transmittance differ between samples, so direct optical comparison may include morphology/thickness effects in addition to orientation.
4 · The third-order NLO test · Fig. 4 · Linked to 6 structured results
The applied-voltage model predicts a much larger gamma increase for c-axis voltage than for ab-plane voltage, consistent with the stronger experimental voltage response of [001]-oriented films.
Caveat: Based on simplified Cu3L2 model; not a directly measured gamma under voltage.
6 · The third-order NLO test · Fig. 5f · Linked to 5 structured results
DFT/TDDFT attributes the stronger [001] NLO response to more diverse electron-transfer pathways, including both intralayer and interlayer transfer, whereas [100] is dominated by local excitation and intralayer transfer.
Caveat: Mechanistic claim is computational and model-dependent.
4 · The third-order NLO test · Supplementary Table 2 · Linked to 6 structured results
The [001]-oriented Cu-HHTP film has better charge transport than the [100]-oriented film, shown by higher I-V response, lower EIS interfacial resistance and higher photocurrent response.
Caveat: Absolute conductivity was not reported; I-V currents are approximate visual reads from the figure.
3 · Characterization · Fig. 3a,b; Supplementary Fig. 7 · Linked to 5 structured results
Names and aliases are kept exactly within the paper’s own identity model.
| Material | Composition | Structure context | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cu-HHTPBrowse family: Cu₃(HHTP)₂ / Cu–HHTP | Cu-HHTP; HHTP = 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexahydroxytriphenyleneCu2+ / copper catecholate nodes · 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexahydroxytriphenylene (HHTP) | 2D · PristineGraphene-like honeycomb porous layered Cu-HHTP; oriented [001] and [100] thin films assigned by out-of-plane and in-plane XRD. | 1-3 · Introduction; Characterization · Fig. 2 |
| Cu-HHTP computational modelsBrowse family: Cu₃(HHTP)₂ / Cu–HHTP | Cu-HHTP model systems; Cu3L2 voltage modelCu centres · HHTP-derived ligand fragments | 2D · Model SystemDFT models for Cu-HHTP along [001] and [100] orientations plus Cu3L2 applied-voltage model. | 4, 6, 8 · The third-order NLO test; DFT calculations · Fig. 4e-g; Fig. 5f; Supplementary Figs. 10-14 |
Sample form, processing state and composition status define the context for measurements.
| Sample | Form and role | Processing and geometry | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cu-HHTP[001] filmresearch_0312__mat__mat_cu_hhtp | Thin Film · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | LPE LBL film with [001] orientation; 10 growth cycles; ethanolic solutions; 40 deg Cfunctionalized ITO glass · about 60 nm | 2-3, 7 · Preparation; Methods · Fig. 1; Fig. 2d |
| ITO-Cu-HHTP[001]-ITO sandwich deviceresearch_0312__mat__mat_cu_hhtp | Electrode · Target Sample · Composite | Cu-HHTP[001] film on ITO with another ITO glass attached for voltage-dependent Z-scan testing.ITO conductive glass / Cu-HHTP[001] / ITO glass · MOF film about 60 nm | 5 · The third-order NLO test · Fig. 5a |
| Cu-HHTP[100] filmresearch_0312__mat__mat_cu_hhtp | Thin Film · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | LPE LBL film with [100] orientation; 15 growth cycles; deionized-water solution with NMP additive; 70 deg Cfunctionalized ITO glass · about 120 nm | 2-3, 7 · Preparation; Methods · Fig. 1; Supplementary Fig. 1c |
| ITO-Cu-HHTP[100]-ITO sandwich deviceresearch_0312__mat__mat_cu_hhtp | Electrode · Target Sample · Composite | Cu-HHTP[100] film on ITO with another ITO glass attached for voltage-dependent Z-scan testing.ITO conductive glass / Cu-HHTP[100] / ITO glass · MOF film about 120 nm | 5 · The third-order NLO test · Fig. 5a |
| Cu-HHTP powderresearch_0312__mat__mat_cu_hhtp | Powder · Pristine Control · Pristine Framework | Solvothermal/hydrothermal powder used for XRD, IR, Raman, TEM, and NLO comparison. | 3, 7 · Characterization; Fabrication of Cu-HHTP Powder · Fig. 2b; Supplementary Fig. 2 |
| Bare ITO glass substrateresearch_0312__mat__mat_cu_hhtp | Electrode · Pristine Control · Composite | Bare substrate reference for Z-scan optical limiting tests.ITO glass | 4-5 · The third-order NLO test · Fig. 4a-c |
| Cu3L2 applied-voltage modelresearch_0312__mat__mat_cu_hhtp_model | Model · Model System · Model | Simple model for applied-voltage theoretical calculation. | 6 · The third-order NLO test · Fig. 5f; Supplementary Figs. 10c and 14 |
| Cu-HHTP [001] orientation DFT modelresearch_0312__mat__mat_cu_hhtp_model | Model · Model System · Model | Computational model for [001] orientation. | 13, 15-16, 20 · Supplementary figures and tables · Supplementary Figs. 10-13; Supplementary Table 2 |
| Cu-HHTP [100] orientation DFT modelresearch_0312__mat__mat_cu_hhtp_model | Model · Model System · Model | Computational model for [100] orientation. | 13, 15-16, 20 · Supplementary figures and tables · Supplementary Figs. 10-13; Supplementary Table 2 |