Dawood S., Yarbrough R., Davis K. et al. · Synthetic Metals · 2019 · 107-112
Open a family to keep every result attached to its sample, method and conditions.
Paraphrased for this database from the authors’ stated interpretations — never quoted verbatim — and kept separate from reported measurements.
Pristine IRMOF-8 microstructure thin films are semiconducting, with an optical band gap around 2.82 eV and electrical conductivity up to 3.98 x 10-2 S cm-1.
Caveat: The abstract reports 2.84 eV whereas the detailed section reports 2.82 eV; the electrical data are thin-film device values from multiple I-V curves with no full statistics reported.
111 · 3.4. Electrical conductivity · Fig. 5 · Linked to 3 structured results
No first-hand BET surface area or gas-sorption porosity data for the prepared microstructures were reported in the provided main article, SI text layer, or rendered SI surrogate.
Caveat: The introduction and references discuss porous MOFs generally, but the extracted porosity result here is image-inferred surface/void dimension only.
110 · 3.2. Solvents dependent self-assembly and their morphology studies · Fig. 4 · Linked to 2 structured results
The microstructures are assigned as interpenetrated IRMOF-8 with Zn4O(NDC)3 formula and pcu topology.
Caveat: Assignment relies on comparison to simulated patterns and reported CCDC data rather than a newly deposited CIF in the provided files.
109 · 3.1. Synthesis and characterization · Fig. 2, Fig. 3 · Linked to 4 structured results
Photoluminescence from the microstructures is assigned to linker-based vibronic transitions without additional charge-transfer emissions.
Caveat: Assignment is based on spectral comparison and peak positions; no time-resolved or computational confirmation was reported.
111 · 3.3. Photophysical properties · Fig. 5(b) · Linked to 3 structured results
Changing the post-synthesis solvent system manipulates nanocrystal arrangement to yield porous/nonporous microstructures with different shapes and sizes.
Caveat: The evidence is qualitative SEM/TEM morphology rather than quantitative mechanistic kinetics.
110 · 3.2. Solvents dependent self-assembly and their morphology studies · Fig. 4 · Linked to 5 structured results
The authors attribute electrical conductivity to the interpenetrated network, offset layer-by-layer NDC packing and the narrow optical band gap.
Caveat: Mechanism is interpretive and not supported by carrier-mobility, temperature-dependent transport or electronic-structure measurements in this paper.
111 · 3.4. Electrical conductivity · Linked to 3 structured results
Names and aliases are kept exactly within the paper’s own identity model.
| Material | Composition | Structure context | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| interpenetrated IRMOF-8 microstructures | Zn4O(NDC)3Zn4O clusters; Zn(II) · 2,6-naphthalene dicarboxylate (NDC) | 3D · PristineTwo-fold interpenetrated IRMOF-8 analogue with primitive cubic (pcu) topology, assigned by powder XRD comparison with simulated INT-IRMOF-8 A and SAED. | 107 · Abstract |
| 2,6-naphthalene dicarboxylic acid ligand | 2,6-NDC / 2,6-naphthalene dicarboxylic acidnone · 2,6-naphthalene dicarboxylic acid | 0D · Model SystemMolecular ligand control used for UV-vis and photoluminescence comparisons. | 111 · 3.3. Photophysical properties · Fig. 5 |
Sample form, processing state and composition status define the context for measurements.
| Sample | Form and role | Processing and geometry | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| as-prepared IRMOF-8 microstructures in DMFresearch_0507__mat__mat_irmof8_microstructures | Powder · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | As-prepared in DMF; imaged by SEM/TEM. | 110 · 3.2. Solvents dependent self-assembly and their morphology studies · Fig. 4(a,b) |
| IRMOF-8 microstructures cast from butanoneresearch_0507__mat__mat_irmof8_microstructures | Thin Film · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | Original microstructures dispersed in butanone, drop-cast and annealed at 100 C for 5 min.drop-casted substrate, substrate material not specified | 110 · 3.2. Solvents dependent self-assembly and their morphology studies · Fig. 4(c,d) |
| glass/ITO/IRMOF-8 microstructures/Cu thin-film deviceresearch_0507__mat__mat_irmof8_microstructures | Electrode · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | ITO cleaned, UV cleaned 35 min, MOF spin-coated from DMF, vacuum dried under nitrogen, Cu deposited by PVD e-beam.ITO-coated glass with 100 nm Cu top electrode · Cu layer 100 nm; MOF active-layer thickness not reported | SI page 2 · Figure S3 · Figure S3 |
| IRMOF-8 microstructures cast from DMF/propanolresearch_0507__mat__mat_irmof8_microstructures | Thin Film · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | Original microstructures dispersed in DMF/propanol (v/v 1:1), drop-cast and annealed at 100 C for 5 min.drop-casted substrate, substrate material not specified | 110 · 3.2. Solvents dependent self-assembly and their morphology studies · Fig. 4(g,h) |
| spin-coated IRMOF-8 microstructure thin film for UV-visresearch_0507__mat__mat_irmof8_microstructures | Thin Film · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | Spin-coated from DMF dispersion and vacuum dried under nitrogen.ozone/UV-treated quartz plate or ITO-coated glass · not reported | 108 · 2.1. Materials |
| off-white crystalline IRMOF-8 microstructure powderresearch_0507__mat__mat_irmof8_microstructures | Powder · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | Solvothermally prepared powder washed with cold DMF and acetone. | 108 · 2.2. General procedure for preparation of IRMOF-8 analogue |
| IRMOF-8 microstructures in ethanol solutionresearch_0507__mat__mat_irmof8_microstructures | Unknown · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | Microstructures measured in ethanol solution for UV-vis spectra. | 111 · Figure 5 caption · Fig. 5(a) |
| IRMOF-8 microstructures cast from tolueneresearch_0507__mat__mat_irmof8_microstructures | Thin Film · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | Original microstructures dispersed in toluene, drop-cast and annealed at 100 C for 5 min.drop-casted substrate, substrate material not specified | 110 · 3.2. Solvents dependent self-assembly and their morphology studies · Fig. 4(e,f) |
| 2,6-NDC ligand solutionresearch_0507__mat__mat_ndc_ligand_control | Model · Model System · Model | Ligand measured in solution for UV-vis and photoluminescence comparison. | 111 · 3.3. Photophysical properties · Fig. 5 |
| 2,6-NDC ligand thin filmresearch_0507__mat__mat_ndc_ligand_control | Model · Model System · Model | Ligand thin film measured by UV-vis for band-gap comparison.not specified | 111 · 3.3. Photophysical properties · Fig. 5(a) |