Computational Modelling — Does the Mode of Metal-Organic Framework/Electrode Adhesion Determine Rates for Redox-Hopping-Based Charge Transport within Thin-Film Metal-Organic Frameworks?

Measurement evidence

Computational Modelling

Does the Mode of Metal-Organic Framework/Electrode Adhesion Determine Rates for Redox-Hopping-Based Charge Transport within Thin-Film Metal-Organic Frameworks? · Duan J., Goswami S., Patwardhan S. et al. · Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2022 · 4601-4611

2 measurement groups · 21 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

ADF DFT; B3LYP exchange-correlation functional; TZP all-electron basis set; fragment-based charge-transfer integral approach

MOF-525 linker-pair computational model · Model

Pairs of linkers extracted from MOF-525 crystal structure; reorganisation energies and transfer integrals calculated

Context
pristine MOF thin film
Measurement source
3 · Calculation Methods
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
DFT methodB3LYP/TZP in ADFText
Qualitative
3 · Calculation Methods

Marcus-type charge-transfer calculations and SI conversion equations

MOF-525 linker-pair computational model · Model

Includes hopping-rate equation, conductivity-to-D(EIS) conversion, transfer integrals, reorganisation energies and model transfer rates

Context
pristine MOF thin film
Measurement source
6 · Calculation details · Tables S2-S5
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
charge transfer integral at 180 deg, electron0.00025 eVSI Table
Exact Reported
6 · Charge transfer integral comparison
charge transfer integral at 180 deg, hole0.00003 eVSI Table
Exact Reported
6 · Charge transfer integral comparison
charge transfer integral at 90 deg, electron0.0016 eVSI Table
Exact Reported
6 · Charge transfer integral comparison
charge transfer integral at 90 deg, hole0.0008 eVSI Table
Exact Reported
6 · Charge transfer integral comparison
charge transfer integral, electron transfer narrative0.016 eVText
Exact Reported
6 · Calculation details
charge transfer integral, hole transfer narrative0.0008 eVText
Exact Reported
6 · Calculation details
hole transfer-rate difference from transfer integrals700x differenceText
Exact Reported
6 · Charge transfer integral comparison
phenyl-porphyrin dihedral inside MOF47-48 degText
Range
6 · Calculation details
phenyl-porphyrin dihedral in solution70-71 degText
Range
6 · Calculation details
MOF-525 linker distortion energy penalty per anchoring group3.5 kcal/molText
Exact Reported
6 · Calculation details
MOF-525 linker distortion energy penalty14 kcal/molText
Exact Reported
6 · Calculation details
internal reorganisation energy, free linker0.13 eVText
Exact Reported
6 · Internal reorganization energy comparison
internal reorganisation energy, linker in MOF0.15 eVText
Exact Reported
7 · Internal reorganization energy comparison
RDA distance, 180 deg neighbour1.89 nmText
Exact Reported
7 · Solvent reorganization energy comparison
RDA distance, 90 deg neighbour1.36 nmText
Exact Reported
7 · Solvent reorganization energy comparison
solvent reorganisation energy, 180 deg neighbour0.54 eVText
Exact Reported
7 · Solvent reorganization energy comparison
solvent reorganisation energy, 90 deg neighbour0.47 eVText
Exact Reported
7 · Solvent reorganization energy comparison
computed transfer rate, 180 deg neighbour2 x 10^6 s^-1Text
Rounded Reported
7 · The transfer rates comparison
computed transfer rate, 90 deg neighbour2 x 10^9 s^-1Text
Rounded Reported
7 · The transfer rates comparison
computed transfer-rate ratiofactor of 1000Text
Rounded Reported
7 · The transfer rates comparison