| Complex 1 catalyst dosage trend | degradation improved from 0.2 to 0.6 g/L; reduced at higher catalyst concentration | — | — | Text Rounded Reported | p.449 · Catalytic Performance · Figure 5b |
| H2O2 concentration trend | degradation increased from 10 to 100 mM and plateaued at higher H2O2 | — | — | Text Rounded Reported | p.449 · Catalytic Performance · Figure 5c |
| Complex 1 degradation of 40 ppm MB in 50 min | 96.2% of 40 ppm MB within 50 min | — | — | Text Rounded Reported | p.448-449 · Catalytic Performance · Figures 4e,f; Figure 5d-f |
| MB degradation using complex 1 + H2O2 under visible light after 20 min | 88.3% in 20 min | — | — | Text Rounded Reported | p.448-449 · Catalytic Performance · Figures 4e,f; Figure 5d-f |
| MB degradation using complex 1 + H2O2 under visible light after 50 minMarked as a best value within this paper | >99% in 50 min | — | — | Text Rounded Reported | p.448-449 · Catalytic Performance · Figures 4e,f; Figure 5d-f |
| MB degradation using complex 1 + H2O2 in dark | 43.5% within 50 min | — | — | Text Rounded Reported | p.448-449 · Catalytic Performance · Figures 4e,f; Figure 5d-f |
| Complex 1+H2O2 rate multiple versus complex 2+H2O2 | 3.2 times higher | — | — | Text Rounded Reported | p.448 · Catalytic Performance · Figure 4d |
| Complex 1+H2O2 rate multiple versus complex 3+H2O2 | 2.0 times higher | — | — | Text Rounded Reported | p.448 · Catalytic Performance · Figure 4d |
| Complex 1 MB degradation rate constant with H2O2Marked as a best value within this paper | k = 0.09557 min-1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | p.448 · Catalytic Performance · Figure 4d |
| Complex 2 MB degradation rate constant with H2O2 | k = 0.03004 min-1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | p.448 · Catalytic Performance · Figure 4d |
| Complex 3 MB degradation rate constant with H2O2 | k = 0.04718 min-1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | p.448 · Catalytic Performance · Figure 4d |
| Complex 1 MB degradation rate constant without H2O2Marked as a best value within this paper | k = 0.01433 min-1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | p.448 · Catalytic Performance · Figure 4b |
| Complex 2 MB degradation rate constant without H2O2 | k = 0.00661 min-1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | p.448 · Catalytic Performance · Figure 4b |
| Complex 3 MB degradation rate constant without H2O2 | k = 0.00793 min-1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | p.448 · Catalytic Performance · Figure 4b |
| MB degradation using complex 1 alone under visible light | 51.7% within 50 min | — | — | Text Rounded Reported | p.448-449 · Catalytic Performance · Figures 4e,f; Figure 5d-f |
| MB degradation using H2O2 alone under visible light | 24.7% within 50 min | — | — | Text Rounded Reported | p.448-449 · Catalytic Performance · Figures 4e,f; Figure 5d-f |
| Complex 1 MB removal at pH 4 | 93.4% | — | — | Text Rounded Reported | p.448-449 · Catalytic Performance · Figures 4e,f; Figure 5d-f |
| Complex 1 MB degradation at pH 5.5 and 7 | >99% of MB was degraded | — | — | Text Approximate | p.449 · Catalytic Performance · Figure 5d |
| Complex 1 MB removal at pH 9 | 91.9% | — | — | Text Rounded Reported | p.448-449 · Catalytic Performance · Figures 4e,f; Figure 5d-f |
| Complex 1 recyclability after five cycles | degradation performance did not reduce after five consecutive cycles | — | — | Text Qualitative | p.449-450 · Recyclability and Universality of Complex 1 · Figure 6a |
| Complex 1 Table S4 catalyst amount | 30 mg | — | — | SI Table Exact Reported | SI p.7 · Table S4 · Table S4 |
| Complex 1 Table S4 MB concentration | 20 mg/L | — | — | SI Table Exact Reported | SI p.7 · Table S4 · Table S4 |
| Complex 1 Table S4 MB removal efficiencyMarked as a best value within this paper | 99.3% | — | — | SI Table Exact Reported | SI p.7 · Table S4 · Table S4 |
| Complex 1 Table S4 MB degradation time | 50 min | — | — | SI Table Exact Reported | SI p.7 · Table S4 · Table S4 |