Measurement evidence
In-situ growth of high-crystallinity M3(hexaaminotriphenylene)2 (M = Co, Ni) thin film for field-effect transistor-based glucose biosensor · Tan P., Shen S., Luo Y. et al. · Chinese Chemical Letters · 2026 · 111636
Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.
Co/Ni-HITP-GA-FET sensor · Electrode
GA-only Co/Ni-HITP-GA-FET exposed to glucose solutions; PBS blank
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| glucose response with GA only | not a significant current response | — | — | Text Qualitative | 5 · Glucose sensing performance · Fig. 5c |
Co/Ni-HITP-GA-GOX-FET sensor · Electrode
15 uL PBS blank followed by 15 uL glucose solutions from 10 nmol/L to 10 mmol/L; Vgs = -0.1 V, Vds = -0.1 V, room temperature
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| glucose detection range lower boundMarked as a best value within this paper | 10 nmol/L | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 5 · Glucose sensing performance · Fig. 5d; Table S1 discussion |
| glucose detection range upper boundMarked as a best value within this paper | 10 mmol/L | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 5 · Glucose sensing performance · Fig. 5d; Table S1 discussion |
| linear fit intercept | -3.76 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 5 · Glucose sensing performance · Fig. 5e |
| linear fit slope | y = -0.39x - 3.76; slope -0.39 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 5 · Glucose sensing performance · Fig. 5e |
| linear glucose range lower boundMarked as a best value within this paper | 10 nmol/L | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 5 · Glucose sensing performance · Fig. 5e |
| linear glucose range upper boundMarked as a best value within this paper | 5 mmol/L | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 5 · Glucose sensing performance · Fig. 5e |
| linear correlation coefficient R2Marked as a best value within this paper | R2 = 0.996 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 5 · Glucose sensing performance · Fig. 5e |
| current response at 10 mmol/L glucoseMarked as a best value within this paper | about 3.30 uA | — | — | Text Approximate | 5 · Glucose sensing performance · Fig. 5d |
| glucose sensitivityMarked as a best value within this paper | 39 uA (mol/L)-1 mm-2 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 5 · Glucose sensing performance · Table S1 discussion |
Co-HITP-GA-GOX-FET sensor · Electrode
Ni-HITP-GA-GOX-FET, Co-HITP-GA-GOX-FET and Co/Ni-HITP(water)-GA-GOX-FET controls fabricated by same modification method
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Co-HITP-GA-GOX-FET total current response from 10 nmol/L to 10 mmol/L | about 1.23 uA | — | — | Text Approximate | 5 · Glucose sensing performance · Fig. S5b |
| Co/Ni-HITP(water)-GA-GOX-FET response quality | satisfactory linearity but relatively small absolute current change | — | — | Text Qualitative | 5 · Glucose sensing performance · Fig. S5c |
| Ni-HITP-GA-GOX-FET glucose response trend | significant current fluctuations, not linear | — | — | Text Qualitative | 5 · Glucose sensing performance · Fig. S5a |
Co/Ni-HITP-GA-GOX-FET sensor · Electrode
10 nmol/L glucose, 1 umol/L fructose/sucrose/ascorbic acid interferences, then 100 nmol/L glucose
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| selectivity against fructose, sucrose and ascorbic acid | 1 umol/L interferents gave only weak response, while 10 and 100 nmol/L glucose gave obvious/significant responses | — | — | Text Qualitative | 5 · Glucose sensing performance · Fig. 5f |
Co/Ni-HITP-GA-GOX-FET sensor · Electrode
Multiple devices stored at 0-4 deg C and tested at 24 h intervals; same sensor retested at two-day intervals
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| high-sensitivity retention duration | up to two days post-modification | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 5 · Glucose sensing performance · Fig. 5g-h |
| reusability current response day 0Marked as a best value within this paper | 2.89 uA | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 5 · Glucose sensing performance · Fig. S6 |
| reusability current-response decrease on day 2 | 3.81 % | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 5 · Glucose sensing performance · Fig. S6 |
| reusability current response day 2 | 2.78 uA | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 5 · Glucose sensing performance · Fig. S6 |
| reusability current-response decrease on day 4 | 47.10 % | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 5 · Glucose sensing performance · Fig. S6 |
| reusability current response day 4 | 1.53 uA | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 5 · Glucose sensing performance · Fig. S6 |
| response to 10 nmol/L glucose in five repeat tests | about 600 nA | — | — | Text Approximate | 5 · Glucose sensing performance · Fig. 5i |
Co/Ni-HITP-FET sensor without modification · Electrode
Unmodified Co/Ni-HITP-FET exposed to glucose solutions; PBS blank
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| glucose response without GOX | not a significant current response | — | — | Text Qualitative | 5 · Glucose sensing performance · Fig. 5b |
Co/Ni-HITP-GA-GOX-FET sensor · Electrode
Comparison table reports this work as bimetallic Co/Ni-HITP FET with detection range 0.01-10000 umol/L
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Table S1 this-work detection range lower boundMarked as a best value within this paper | 0.01 umol/L | — | — | SI Table Exact Reported | S-11 · Supporting information · Table S1 |
| Table S1 this-work detection range upper boundMarked as a best value within this paper | 10000 umol/L | — | — | SI Table Exact Reported | S-11 · Supporting information · Table S1 |