cMOF Evidence Base
Spectroscopy — Microfluidic Printing-Induced Dynamic Splitting of Conductive MOF to Expose High-Density Active Sites for Boosted CO2 Electroreduction

Measurement evidence

Spectroscopy

Microfluidic Printing-Induced Dynamic Splitting of Conductive MOF to Expose High-Density Active Sites for Boosted CO2 Electroreduction · Yue J.-N., Wang Y., Meng J. et al. · Small · 2026 · e00018

2 measurement groups · 13 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

In situ ATR-FTIR spectroscopy during CO2RR

Infrared spectroscopy

MF-cMOFQx/ty H-cell electrode inks · Electrode

10 min tests at applied potentials from -0.8 to -2.2 V in 0.1 M KHCO3-KCl electrolyte.

Atmosphere
CO2RR electrolyte
Geometry
ATR-FTIR electrochemical cell
Context
target vs ST-cMOF comparison
Measurement source
Section S1 Structural characterization · Figure 4; Figures S48-S49
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
*CH2O ATR-FTIR band range1740-1700 cm^-1—rangeText
Range		6 · 2.3 Mechanism Study · Figure 4b,d
*CHO ATR-FTIR band1635 cm^-1——Text
Exact Reported		6 · 2.3 Mechanism Study · Figure 4b,d
*COOH ATR-FTIR band range1500-1580 cm^-1—rangeText
Range		6 · 2.3 Mechanism Study · Figure 4b,d
*CH2O integrated peak area slope on MF-cMOFQ1.28/t5Marked as a best value within this paper0.61——Text
Exact Reported		6-7 · 2.3 Mechanism Study · Figure 4e
*CH2O integrated peak area slope on ST-cMOF0.37——Text
Exact Reported		6-7 · 2.3 Mechanism Study · Figure 4e
*CHO integrated peak area slope on MF-cMOFQ1.28/t5Marked as a best value within this paper0.66——Text
Exact Reported		6 · 2.3 Mechanism Study · Figure 4e
*CHO integrated peak area slope on ST-cMOF0.46——Text
Exact Reported		6 · 2.3 Mechanism Study · Figure 4e
*COOH integrated peak area slope on MF-cMOFQ1.28/t5Marked as a best value within this paper0.61——Text
Exact Reported		6 · 2.3 Mechanism Study · Figure 4e
*COOH integrated peak area slope on ST-cMOF0.46——Text
Exact Reported		6 · 2.3 Mechanism Study · Figure 4e

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS)

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

MF-cMOFQ1.28/t5 · Nanosheet

Survey and high-resolution C 1s, Cu 2p, and O 1s spectra of MF-cMOFQ1.28/t5 compared with ST-cMOF.

Geometry
powder XPS
Context
pristine target and control comparison
Measurement source
4-5 · 2.1 Synthesis and Characterization of cMOF · Figures S29-S32
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
C 1s deconvolution peak positions283.8, 285.1, 287.8, and 291.6 eV assigned to C-C, C-O, C=O, and pi-pi* excited state——Text
Exact Reported		4-5 · 2.1 Synthesis and Characterization of cMOF · Figure S30
Cu 2p peak positions933.7 and 953.5 eV assigned to Cu 2p3/2 and Cu 2p1/2; satellites at 938.9, 942.8, and 961.6 eV——Text
Exact Reported		5 · 2.1 Synthesis and Characterization of cMOF · Figure S31
O 1s deconvolution peak positions529.9, 530.5, 531.2, and 532.6 eV assigned to Cu-O, C-O, C=O, and -OH——Text
Exact Reported		5 · 2.1 Synthesis and Characterization of cMOF · Figure S32
Enhanced pi-pi* satellite peakMarked as a best value within this paperEnhanced pi-pi* satellite peak at 291.6 eV for MF-cMOFQ1.28/t5——Text
Exact Reported		5 · 2.1 Synthesis and Characterization of cMOF · Figure S30