Electrochemistry Application — A conductive metal-organic framework-modified electrode for sensitive electrochemiluminescent detection of cardiac Troponin I

5 measurement groups · 12 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

SPCE/Cu3(HHTP)2 · Electrode

SPCE/Cu3(HHTP)2 redox behaviour in PBS, potential window -0.7 to +1.3 V vs Ag/AgCl, 50 mV/s.

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
CV HHTP catechol to hemiquinone oxidation peak	0.91 V vs Ag/AgCl	—	—	Text Exact Reported	p004-p005 · 3.3 Redox properties · Figure 5A
CV oxidation peak Cu0 to Cu+	-0.078 V vs Ag/AgCl	—	—	Text Exact Reported	p004-p005 · 3.3 Redox properties · Figure 5A
CV oxidation peak Cu+ to Cu2+	0.34 V vs Ag/AgCl	—	—	Text Exact Reported	p004-p005 · 3.3 Redox properties · Figure 5A

SPCE/Cu3(HHTP)2/Ab/BSA immunosensor · Electrode

5.0 mM K3[Fe(CN)6] in PBS, scan rate 50 mV/s, comparing SPCE, SPCE/Cu3(HHTP)2, SPCE/Cu3(HHTP)2/Ab, and SPCE/Cu3(HHTP)2/Ab/BSA.

Geometry: screen-printed electrode
Context: stepwise immunosensor fabrication
Measurement source: p005-p006 · 2.5; 3.4 Characterization of immunosensor · Figure 6A

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source

SPCE/Cu3(HHTP)2 · Electrode

PBS containing 100 uM [Ru(bpy)3]2+; SPCE/Cu3(HHTP)2 compared with unmodified SPCE.

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
Anodic current peak for SPCE/Cu3(HHTP)2 with [Ru(bpy)3]2+Marked as a best value within this paper	approximately 190 uA at high positive potential	—	visual estimate from plotted axis	Figure Axis Approximate	p006 · 3.4 Characterization of immunosensor · Figure 7B

SPCE/Cu3(HHTP)2 · Electrode

100 uM [Ru(bpy)3]2+ in 10 mM PBS, pH 7.0; potential range 0 to 1.3 V vs Ag/AgCl, scan rate 0.05 V/s.

Geometry: screen-printed electrode
Context: SPCE/Cu3(HHTP)2 versus unmodified SPCE
Measurement source: p006 · 2.6; 3.4 Characterization of immunosensor · Figure 7A

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
Maximum ECL intensity for SPCE/Cu3(HHTP)2 in [Ru(bpy)3]2+Marked as a best value within this paper	approximately 41 a.u. peak near 0.95 V	—	visual estimate from plotted axis	Figure Axis Approximate	p006 · 3.4 Characterization of immunosensor · Figure 7A
ECL intensity for unmodified SPCE in [Ru(bpy)3]2+	approximately 23-24 a.u.; nearly flat baseline	—	visual estimate from plotted axis	Figure Axis Approximate	p006 · 3.4 Characterization of immunosensor · Figure 7A

SPCE/HHTP ligand film · Electrode

SPCE/HHTP with and without 100 uM [Ru(bpy)3]2+; CV and ECL responses shown in SI Figure S1.

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
HHTP ligand control ECL enhancement	SPCE/HHTP showed clear anodic ECL enhancement relative to unmodified electrode; no ECL emission without HHTP under identical conditions	—	—	Qualitative Qualitative	p002 · Figure S1 note · Figure S1
SPCE/HHTP anodic peak i potential	approximately 0.13 V vs Ag/AgCl	—	visual estimate from SI figure label	Figure Axis Approximate	p002 · Figure S1 · Figure S1
SPCE/HHTP anodic peak ii potential	approximately 0.29 V vs Ag/AgCl	—	visual estimate from SI figure label	Figure Axis Approximate	p002 · Figure S1 · Figure S1
SPCE/HHTP anodic peak iii potential	approximately 0.63 V vs Ag/AgCl	—	visual estimate from SI figure label	Figure Axis Approximate	p002 · Figure S1 · Figure S1
[Ru(bpy)3]2+ oxidation peak on SPCE/HHTP	approximately 1.15 V vs Ag/AgCl	—	visual estimate from SI figure label	Figure Axis Approximate	p002 · Figure S1 · Figure S1
SPCE/HHTP ECL peak intensity with [Ru(bpy)3]2+	approximately 33 a.u. near 1.15 V	—	visual estimate from SI Figure S1b axis	Figure Axis Approximate	p002 · Figure S1 · Figure S1