Sensing Application — A conductive metal-organic framework-modified electrode for sensitive electrochemiluminescent detection of cardiac Troponin I

Measurement evidence

Sensing Application

A conductive metal-organic framework-modified electrode for sensitive electrochemiluminescent detection of cardiac Troponin I · Murray A., Valenti G., Baker P. · Electrochimica Acta · 2026 · 148350

4 measurement groups · 11 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

ECL cTnI calibration

SPCE/Cu3(HHTP)2/Ab/BSA immunosensor · Electrode

Optimised ECL conditions; cTnI additions over 0-80 pg/mL in PBS containing 100 uM [Ru(bpy)3]2+, n = 3.

Geometry
SPCE/Cu3(HHTP)2/Ab/BSA immunosensor
Context
final immunosensor
Measurement source
p008-p009 · 3.7 Analytical performance · Figure 9; Table 1
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Clinical threshold comparison for early AMI diagnosis0.4 ng/mL or 400 pg/mL0.4 ng/mLText
Exact Reported
p008 · 3.7 Analytical performance
Calibration correlation coefficientMarked as a best value within this paperR = 0.99Text
Exact Reported
p008 · 3.7 Analytical performance · Figure 9B
cTnI linear calibration rangeMarked as a best value within this paper0-80 pg/mLrangeText
Range
p008-p009 · 3.7 Analytical performance · Figure 9; Table 1
Limit of detection for cTnIMarked as a best value within this paper10.23 +/- 1.06 pg/mL+/- 1.06 pg/mLText
Exact Reported
p008-p009 · 3.7 Analytical performance; Table 1 · Table 1
Limit of quantification for cTnIMarked as a best value within this paper30.98 +/- 3.20 pg/mL+/- 3.20 pg/mLText
Exact Reported
p008 · 3.7 Analytical performance
Calibration regression intercept21.64 a.u.Text
Exact Reported
p008 · 3.7 Analytical performance · Figure 9B
Calibration regression slopeMarked as a best value within this papery = 0.85X + 21.64Text
Exact Reported
p008 · 3.7 Analytical performance · Figure 9B

ECL optimisation versus Cu3(HHTP)2 dispersion concentration

SPCE/Cu3(HHTP)2 · Electrode

Drop-casting suspensions of different Cu3(HHTP)2 loadings; ECL intensity monitored.

Geometry
SPCE/Cu3(HHTP)2
Context
c-MOF/SPCE sensor optimisation
Measurement source
p007 · 3.6 Optimization · Figure 8A
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Optimal Cu3(HHTP)2 dispersion concentrationMarked as a best value within this paper2 mg/mL selected as optimal c-MOF loadingText
Exact Reported
p007 · 3.6 Optimization · Figure 8A

ECL optimisation versus electrolyte pH

SPCE/Cu3(HHTP)2/Ab/BSA immunosensor · Electrode

Solution pH varied between 6.0 and 8.0; pH 7.0 chosen for immunoassays despite peak at pH 8.0.

Geometry
SPCE/Cu3(HHTP)2-based immunosensor
Context
immunosensor optimisation
Measurement source
p007-p008 · 3.6 Optimization · Figure 8B
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
pH at maximum ECL responsepH 8.0 peakText
Exact Reported
p007-p008 · 3.6 Optimization · Figure 8B
pH selected for immunoassayMarked as a best value within this paperpH 7.0 preferred for immunoassaysText
Exact Reported
p007-p008 · 3.6 Optimization · Figure 8B

ECL optimisation versus [Ru(bpy)3]2+ concentration

SPCE/Cu3(HHTP)2/Ab/BSA immunosensor · Electrode

[Ru(bpy)3]2+ concentration varied from 1 uM to 150 uM; maximum at 100 uM.

Geometry
SPCE/Cu3(HHTP)2-based immunosensor
Context
immunosensor optimisation
Measurement source
p007-p008 · 3.6 Optimization · Figure 8C
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Optimal [Ru(bpy)3]2+ concentrationMarked as a best value within this paper100 uM maximum ECL intensityText
Exact Reported
p008 · 3.6 Optimization · Figure 8C