Review · secondary evidencePerspective

Electrically Conductive Coordination Polymers for Electronic and Optoelectronic Device Applications

Hao Liu, Yongshuai Wang, Zhengsheng Qin, Dan Liu, Hai Xu, Huanli Dong, and Wenping Hu · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · 2021

This dossier represents secondary evidence: section summaries, claims and benchmarks are paraphrased for this database, not quoted. Check quantitative values against the linked primary study, and cite the review itself (10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c02988) for its arguments.

7review sections
8material families
16review claims
20secondary benchmarks
36cited studies
8research gaps

Review scope

Provide a perspective on electrically conductive coordination polymers for electronic and optoelectronic devices, linking electronic design, charge-transport mechanisms, thin-film fabrication routes, device demonstrations, and open research needs.

Coverage
2009–2020
Category
Review Thin Film Device
Material scope
electrically conductive coordination polymers · porous coordination polymers and MOFs · nonporous pi-d conjugated coordination polymers · 2D conductive MOFs and CPs · 3D conductive MOFs · thin films and single crystals for devices
Transport scope
band-like transport · hopping transport · through-bond transport · through-space transport · redox or host-guest mediated conductivity · mobility and conductivity measurement caveats
Application scope
chemiresistive sensors · field-effect transistors · organic photovoltaics · photodetectors · spintronic devices · thermoelectrics · memristors · light-emitting devices as outlook
Explicit exclusions
broad one-dimensional coordination polymers outside the selected scope · full synthetic recipes · exhaustive bibliography of all conductive MOFs · primary-data replacement for device benchmarks
Source
1612 · Abstract
Evidence role
Context, taxonomy and secondary benchmarking

Section map

The review’s argument is preserved as a navigable set of section summaries.

Conductive MOFs/CPs for chemiresistive sensors

1618-1620

Summarises conductive porous MOFs as chemical-to-electrical transducers, including NH3 and VOC sensing by 2D frameworks and hydrocarbon sensing in 3D conductive MOFs.

Relevance: Supporting · 1618 · Conductive MOFs/CPs for Chemiresistive Sensors · Figure 6

Conductive MOFs/CPs for FETs

1619-1622

Positions conductive MOFs/CPs as an FET material class, compares Cu-BHT, Ni3(HITP)2, and redox-controlled Fe2(BDP)3 devices, and tabulates mobility, conductivity, device structure, and fabrication method.

Relevance: Core · 1621 · Conductive MOFs/CPs for FETs · Table 1

Introduction and scope

1612-1614

Frames conductive coordination polymers as a newer alternative to conjugated organic polymers, narrows the review to porous MOFs/PCPs and nonporous pi-d CPs, and identifies their advantages and early milestones.

Relevance: Core · 1613 · Introduction · Figure 1

OPVs, photodetectors, and other devices

1622-1624

Reviews early photovoltaic, sensitiser, photodetector, spin-valve, thermoelectric, memristor, photoconductive, and light-emission opportunities, while noting slow development and unresolved device questions.

Relevance: Supporting · 1623 · Conductive MOFs/CPs for OPVs and Photodetectors · Figure 8

Outlook and open questions

1623-1624

Lists author-prioritised needs: rational design, controllable preparation, high-quality single crystals, standardised conductivity and mobility measurements, and expansion into LEDs, LETs, phototransistors, and superconducting applications.

Relevance: Core · 1623 · Outlook

Thin-film and sample preparation

1616-1618

Treats device-ready form as a prerequisite and compares interfacial synthesis, powder-based deposition, and liquid-phase epitaxy for conductive MOF/CP films.

Relevance: Core · 1616 · Preparation of working samples · Figure 3

Electronic structures and charge transport mechanisms

1614-1616

Explains conductivity as carrier density times mobility, contrasts band-like and hopping regimes, and organises charge pathways by 1D, 2D, and 3D framework dimensionality.

Relevance: Core · 1614 · Electronic structures and charge transport mechanisms · Figure 2

Taxonomies

Classification systems are attributed to this review and are not treated as a global material registry.

Application TypeAuthor-proposed

Electronic and optoelectronic device classes

The device taxonomy separates demonstrations with realised devices from outlook targets such as LEDs and light-emitting transistors.

Categories: chemiresistive sensors · field-effect transistors · organic photovoltaics · photodetectors · spintronic devices · thermoelectrics · memristors · light-emitting devices

1618 · Device applications

Framework Dimensionality And PathwayAuthor-proposed

Dimensional transport pathways

The review treats framework dimensionality as a practical organising axis for transport pathways and device-relevant anisotropy.

Categories: 1D through-bond metal-organic chains · 2D through-bond pi-d networks · 2D through-space pi-pi stacking · 3D through-space redox-active cores · 3D through-bond metal-ligand networks · host-guest or redox-doped conduction

1614 · Electronic structures and charge transport mechanisms · Figure 2c-e

Device Sample FabricationAuthor-proposed

Common film-preparation routes

For device integration, the review groups conductive MOF/CP films into three commonly used preparation families and discusses their process strengths and weaknesses.

Categories: interfacial synthesis · powder MOFs/CPs-based deposition · liquid-phase epitaxy

1617 · Preparation of working samples · Figure 3

Linker Chemistry

Planar electroactive ligand families for 2D conductive frameworks

The review highlights flat, multidentate, pi-conjugated ligands with N, O, S, or Se donor atoms as common building blocks for 2D conductive MOFs/CPs.

Categories: benzoquinone-based dhbq ligands · hexa-substituted triphenylenes (HXTP) · hexa-substituted benzenes (HXB) · phthalocyanine-based ligands

1614 · Electronic structures and charge transport mechanisms

Porosity And Framework TypeAuthor-proposed

Two major coordination-polymer categories

The perspective deliberately narrows its review to porous MOFs/PCPs and nonporous pi-d CPs, excluding the broad 1D CP field for readability.

Categories: porous coordination polymers / MOFs / PCPs · nonporous pi-d conjugated coordination polymers

1613 · Introduction

Charge Transport Mechanism

Band-like versus hopping transport

Band-like transport is associated with delocalised bands and can decline with increased scattering at higher temperature; hopping transport proceeds between separated localised sites and is thermally activated.

Categories: band-like transport · hopping transport

1614 · Electronic structures and charge transport mechanisms · Figure 2a,b

Material families

Review-defined families retain their representative materials and conduction descriptions.

HXB/BHT benzene-based pi-d coordination polymers

2D Sheets Or Networks

2D frameworks built from hexa-substituted benzene ligands, especially benzenehexathiol and related chalcogenolate linkers.

Conduction: Metal-sulfur or metal-chalcogen networks can give very high film conductivity, metallic states, and ambipolar FET behaviour.

Representative materials: Cu-BHT · Ag-BHT · Ni3(BHT)2

Nodes / linkers: Cu · Ag · Ni · benzenehexathiol · benzenehexaselenolate · bis(dithiolene)

1616 · Electronic structures and charge transport mechanisms · Figure 2h

Dithiolene and pyrazinedithiolate conductive frameworks

1D Chains And 3D Porous Frameworks

Frameworks using redox-active dithiolene or pyrazinedithiolate units to promote donor-acceptor charge transfer.

Conduction: Soft metal-sulfur linkages and donor-acceptor building units can provide hopping, through-bond, or guest-sensitive conductive pathways.

Representative materials: Cu[Cu(pdt)2] · Cu[Ni(pdt)2] · Mn2(DSBDC)

Nodes / linkers: Cu · Ni · Mn · pyrazinedithiolate · disulfhydrylbenzene dicarboxylate

1613 · Introduction

HXTP/HITP/HHTP triphenylene-based 2D frameworks

2D Layered Frameworks

2D conductive MOFs/CPs based on hexa-substituted triphenylene linkers such as HITP, HHTP, or THT.

Conduction: Flat pi-conjugated ligands with transition-metal nodes enable in-plane delocalisation and, in some cases, band-like or high-mobility behaviour.

Representative materials: Ni3(HITP)2 · Cu3(HITP)2 · Cu3(HHTP)2 · Fe3(THT)2(NH4)3

Nodes / linkers: Ni · Cu · Fe · hexaiminotriphenylene · hexahydroxytriphenylene · triphenylenehexathiol

1614 · Electronic structures and charge transport mechanisms

MOF photovoltaic and photodetector active layers

Thin Films, Layered 2D Frameworks, And Porous MOFs

MOF/CP films used as photoactive or hole-transporting sensitiser layers in photovoltaic and photodetector devices.

Conduction: Device performance depends on light absorption, exciton dissociation, charge transport and collection, plus conductive or doped MOF pathways.

Representative materials: Al2(BDC)3 · Cu-based MOF benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylate · Co-DAPV · Fe3(THT)2(NH4)3

Nodes / linkers: Al · Cu · Co · Fe · benzenedicarboxylate · benzenetricarboxylate · viologen · triphenylenehexathiol

1622 · Conductive MOFs/CPs for OPVs and Photodetectors · Figure 8

Nonporous pi-d conjugated coordination polymers

Principally 2D Networks And Nanosheets

Nonporous coordination polymers in which metal centres and pi-conjugated ligands form extended pi-d conjugated networks.

Conduction: Strong metal-ligand orbital coupling and pi-d interactions promote delocalisation and high conductivity.

Representative materials: Cu-BHT · Ag-BHT · Ni3(BHT)2

Nodes / linkers: Cu · Ag · Ni · benzenehexathiol · bis(dithiolene)

1613 · Introduction

Porous conductive MOFs/PCPs

2D And 3D Porous Frameworks

Intrinsically porous crystalline coordination polymers built from metal ions or clusters and organic linkers, treated as one of the review's two main categories.

Conduction: Conductivity is achieved through donor-acceptor combinations, extended pi-d networks, through-space overlap, or guest/redox modulation rather than by porosity alone.

Representative materials: Cu[Cu(pdt)2] · Cu[Ni(pdt)2] · Ni3(HITP)2 · Cu3(HHTP)2

Nodes / linkers: Cu · Ni · dithiolene · hexaiminotriphenylene · hexahydroxytriphenylene

1613 · Introduction

Redox-controlled Fe2(BDP)3 frameworks

3D Porous Framework With 1D Pyrazolate Chains

3D MOFs whose charge transport is modulated by controlled Fe(III) reduction to mixed-valence KxFe2(BDP)3.

Conduction: Controlled reduction creates mixed-valence pathways along pyrazolate chains, increasing conductivity and electron mobility but retaining strong anisotropy.

Representative materials: Fe2(BDP)3 · K0.98Fe2(BDP)3 · KxFe2(BDP)3

Nodes / linkers: Fe · K · benzene dipyrazolate

1621 · Conductive MOFs/CPs for FETs · Figure 7f

TTF-based 3D conductive MOFs

3D Porous Frameworks

Porous 3D MOFs incorporating tetrathiafulvalene or related electron-rich cores.

Conduction: Neighbouring TTF motifs create through-space pathways via short S...S contacts and spatial hopping of charge carriers.

Representative materials: Zn2(TTFTB) · Cd2(TTFTB)

Nodes / linkers: Zn · Cd · tetrathiafulvalene tetrabenzoate

1615 · Electronic structures and charge transport mechanisms

Synthesis strategies

Review-level synthesis principles remain separate from primary-study recipes.

Interfacial synthesis

Grow thin films at liquid-liquid or air-liquid interfaces, enabling freestanding or ultrathin MOF/CP films that can be transferred or integrated into devices.

Claimed effects: Can produce uniform films, ultrathin nanosheets, and oriented 2D conductive layers for structural characterisation and devices.

Controlling variables: choice of immiscible phases · precursor diffusion rates · air-liquid versus liquid-liquid interface · growth direction · film transfer substrate

Representative materials: Ag-BHT · Ni3(BHT)2 · Cu-BHT · Ni3(HITP)2

Caveat: Film nucleation and morphology depend strongly on precursor diffusion and interfacial conditions; transfer and large-area uniformity remain practical issues.

1616 · Interfacial Synthesis · Figures 3a and 4a-b

Liquid-phase epitaxy

Use functionalised substrates and sequential precursor deposition to grow surface-supported MOF/CP thin films layer by layer.

Claimed effects: Enables controlled film orientation, thickness and roughness, including spray LPE films for room-temperature chemiresistive sensing.

Controlling variables: SAM terminal group · substrate functionalisation · metal salt and ligand sequence · number of growth cycles · film orientation · thickness and roughness

Representative materials: Cu3(HHTP)2

Caveat: The route can be technologically tedious, and the review notes broader weaknesses across current film protocols.

1616 · Liquid-Phase Epitaxy · Figures 3c and 4c

Powder MOFs/CPs-based deposition

Deposit powder MOFs/CPs directly onto substrates or prepatterned electrodes, typically by drop-casting, for device fabrication.

Claimed effects: Offers a facile route from powder materials to devices and has been used in FET demonstrations.

Controlling variables: powder dispersion · substrate and electrode geometry · drop-casting conditions · post-deposition film integrity

Representative materials: In(isophthalate)2 · Im@CuBTC

Caveat: The review warns that PMD films often lack clear microzone characterisation and identification of the as-fabricated film.

1616 · Powder MOFs/CPs-Based Deposition · Figure 3b

Redox, guest, and dopant modulation

Modify conductive or semiconductive MOFs by guest inclusion, iodine doping, or controlled redox chemistry to tune carrier density and charge pathways.

Claimed effects: Can switch or increase conductivity, improve photovoltaic interfaces, or create mixed-valence pathways for transistor devices.

Controlling variables: oxidation or reduction state · guest molecule identity · dopant loading · framework redox-active sites · anisotropic pathway control

Representative materials: KxFe2(BDP)3 · I2-doped Cu-based MOF · DMB@Al2(BDC)3 · Cu[Ni(pdt)2]

Caveat: Changes can produce anisotropic conduction, measurement ambiguity, or device behaviour that depends on non-intrinsic guest and interface effects.

1621 · Conductive MOFs/CPs for FETs · Figure 7f

Review claims

These are the review authors’ synthesis, not newly measured results.

Consensus SummaryHigh supportStructure Property Link

Flat multidentate pi-conjugated ligands coordinated to transition metals can create 2D pi-d extended structures that support in-plane delocalisation and through-bond transport.

Evidence basis: single_reference

Caveat: Out-of-plane through-space transport can also matter in layered materials.

1614 · Electronic structures and charge transport mechanisms

Author InterpretationHigh supportCaveat

For 3D conductive MOFs/CPs, anisotropic charge transport is a recurring concern because conduction pathways can be fixed by nonisotropic structure.

Evidence basis: multi_reference

Caveat: The review suggests isotropic conduction would be more beneficial for electronic and optoelectronic devices.

1615 · Electronic structures and charge transport mechanisms

Consensus SummaryHigh supportTransport Mechanism

Band-like and hopping transport are treated as the dominant conceptual regimes for MOF/CP charge transport, with opposite temperature-dependence expectations.

Evidence basis: multi_reference

Caveat: Real materials may mix mechanisms or show anisotropic pathways.

1614 · Electronic structures and charge transport mechanisms · Figure 2a,b

Consensus SummaryHigh supportTransport Mechanism

The review presents conductivity as controlled by carrier density and mobility; electronic structure affects carrier concentration while transport mode affects mobility.

Evidence basis: review_reasoning

Caveat: This is a conceptual framing and does not identify all device-specific contact or morphology effects.

1614 · Electronic structures and charge transport mechanisms

Author InterpretationMedium supportHistorical Development

The review interprets the 2009-2020 literature as a seven-order-of-magnitude improvement in MOF/CP conductivity alongside rapid expansion in the number of conductive examples.

Evidence basis: multi_reference

Caveat: Figure 5 is selective and not an exhaustive database; comparisons mix pellets, films and methods.

1618 · Device applications · Figure 5

Author InterpretationHigh supportConsensus

Conductive coordination polymers are attractive because they combine compositional diversity, crystallinity for structure-function analysis, tunable apertures and functionalisation, device-compatible dimensionality, and additional magnetic or quantum possibilities.

Evidence basis: review_reasoning

Caveat: The advantages are potential rather than uniformly realised in current devices.

1613 · Introduction

Consensus SummaryMedium supportMeasurement Interpretation

Before rigorous measurements, DFT predictions of band structures, band gaps and densities of states can guide interpretation of electronic behaviour.

Evidence basis: single_reference

Caveat: DFT is presented as instructive, not a substitute for measurements.

1615 · Electronic structures and charge transport mechanisms · Figure 2f-h

Author InterpretationMedium supportApplication Relevance

Introducing metals into extended organic conjugated backbones is presented as an alternative route for FET materials beyond conventional organic and polymer semiconductors.

Evidence basis: single_reference

Caveat: High conductivity can be counterproductive for transistor switching when off-state behaviour is required.

1620 · Conductive MOFs/CPs for FETs

Author InterpretationHigh supportCaveat

Current interfacial, powder-deposition and LPE film protocols are compatible with some devices but are substantially limited by poor applicability, inferior film quality, or tedious processing.

Evidence basis: review_reasoning

Caveat: The assessment is qualitative and protocol-dependent.

1618 · Preparation of working samples

Consensus SummaryHigh supportMaterial Comparison

Most coordination polymers are still electrical insulators at room temperature, which limits direct use in electronic and optoelectronic devices.

Evidence basis: review_reasoning

Caveat: The claim is a broad review-level framing rather than a complete survey of all CP measurements.

1613 · Introduction

Author InterpretationHigh supportCaveat

MOF/CP active layers in OPVs remain challenging because they need visible/near-IR absorption and efficient generation, separation, transport and collection of photocarriers.

Evidence basis: review_reasoning

Caveat: The review treats this as a slow-developing field with only proof-of-concept demonstrations.

1622 · Conductive MOFs/CPs for OPVs and Photodetectors

Author InterpretationHigh supportDefinition Scope

For device-oriented discussion, the authors restrict conductive coordination polymers mainly to porous MOFs/PCPs and nonporous pi-d conjugated CPs.

Evidence basis: review_reasoning

Caveat: The choice explicitly excludes much of the broader 1D CP literature.

1613 · Introduction

Author InterpretationHigh supportCaveat

For conductive MOF sensor arrays, the review notes that observed sensing responses are not fully understood and may involve competing charge-transfer and hydrogen-bonding mechanisms.

Evidence basis: single_reference

Caveat: Mechanistic attribution remains speculative in the cited array study.

1618 · Conductive MOFs/CPs for Chemiresistive Sensors · Figure 6b

Author InterpretationHigh supportCaveat

High-quality single crystals are described as urgently needed because polycrystalline films and pellets introduce grain boundaries and defects that can obscure intrinsic transport.

Evidence basis: single_reference

Caveat: The review frames this as an aspirational direction; most current examples remain polycrystalline films or pellets.

1624 · Outlook

Author InterpretationHigh supportMeasurement Interpretation

The authors argue that conductivity and mobility testing in MOFs/CPs needs standardisation because different methods may overestimate or inconsistently report high performance.

Evidence basis: multi_reference

Caveat: The warning is especially relevant when comparing pellets, films, Hall measurements and FET-extracted mobilities.

1624 · Outlook

Author InterpretationHigh supportSynthesis Strategy

Device integration generally requires high-quality thin films or single crystals on substrates rather than bulk powders.

Evidence basis: single_reference

Caveat: The review notes that current protocols still suffer from applicability, quality, or process burdens.

1616 · Preparation of working samples

Secondary benchmarks

Every row remains visibly secondary and links to a primary dossier only where the mapping is verified.

MaterialPropertyReported valueContext and qualityPrimary evidenceReview source
SecondaryAg-BHTroom-temperature conductivity250 S cm^-1room temperature; similar device configuration
Text · Exact Reported
research_07351616 · Electronic structures and charge transport mechanisms · Figure 2h
SecondaryCo-DAPVhole mobility0.017 cm2 V^-1 s^-1Hall effect measurement; hole-transporting sensitiser
Text · Exact Reported
research_02311623 · Conductive MOFs/CPs for OPVs and Photodetectors
SecondaryCo-DAPVsolar-cell power conversion efficiency2.1%solid-state solar cell; 15 LbL cycles; TiO2/Co-DAPV heterojunction
Text · Exact Reported
research_02311623 · Conductive MOFs/CPs for OPVs and Photodetectors · Figure 8d
SecondaryCu-BHTfilm conductivity1580 S cm^-1film; four-probe measurement
Text · Exact Reported
research_00061616 · Electronic structures and charge transport mechanisms
SecondaryCu-BHTFET charge carrier mobility99 and 116 cm2 V^-1 s^-1 for holes and electrons, respectivelyambipolar FET; Cu-BHT films on Si/SiO2; review reports hole and electron mobilities
Text · Range
research_00061620 · Conductive MOFs/CPs for FETs · Figure 7b,c
SecondaryCu[Cu(pdt)2]electrical conductivity6 x 10^-4 S cm^-1ambient temperature; 3D porous MOF
Text · Exact Reported
research_02011613 · Introduction
SecondaryCu3(HHTP)2magnetoresistance25% at 10 Korganic spin valve with LSMO and Co/Au electrodes
Text · Exact Reported
research_01291623 · Conductive MOFs/CPs for Other Related Applications
SecondaryCu3(HHTP)(THQ)conductivity~2.53 x 10^-5 S cm^-1two-probe pellet configuration
Text · Approximate
research_07931618 · Conductive MOFs/CPs for Chemiresistive Sensors
SecondaryCu3(HHTP)(THQ)NH3 limit of detection0.02-0.35 ppmgas sensor devices; concentration-dependent sensing response
Text · Range
research_07931618 · Conductive MOFs/CPs for Chemiresistive Sensors · Figure 6f
SecondaryCu3(HITP)2NH3 limit of detection0.5 ppmchemiresistive sensing; constant potential of 100 mV
Text · Exact Reported
research_00021618 · Conductive MOFs/CPs for Chemiresistive Sensors
SecondaryI2-doped Cu-based MOFsolar-cell power conversion efficiency0.26%TiO2-based photovoltaic cell; 1 sun illumination
Text · Exact Reported
No verified corpus mapping1623 · Conductive MOFs/CPs for OPVs and Photodetectors
SecondaryFe3(THT)2(NH4)3charge mobility~220 cm2 V^-1 s^-1room temperature; estimated from time-resolved terahertz spectroscopy
Text · Approximate
research_00011614 · Electronic structures and charge transport mechanisms
SecondaryFe3(THT)2(NH4)3specific detectivity7 x 10^8 cm Hz1/2 W^-1785 nm excitation at 77 K; two-terminal photodetector
Text · Exact Reported
No verified corpus mapping1623 · Conductive MOFs/CPs for OPVs and Photodetectors · Figure 8h
SecondaryK0.98Fe2(BDP)3conductivity0.025 S cm^-1two-point measurements after potassium naphthalenide reduction
Text · Exact Reported
research_00291621 · Conductive MOFs/CPs for FETs · Table 1
SecondaryK0.98Fe2(BDP)3electron mobility0.84 cm2 V^-1 s^-1n-type conduction; single-crystal FET device
Text · Exact Reported
research_00291621 · Conductive MOFs/CPs for FETs · Figure 7f and Table 1
SecondaryCu3(HHTP)2, Cu3(HITP)2, and Ni3(HITP)2 sensor arrayVOC classification accuracy>90% accuracy upon a 30 s exposure to 200 ppm analytes16 VOCs grouped into five categories; PCA analysis
Text · Approximate
research_01451618 · Conductive MOFs/CPs for Chemiresistive Sensors · Figure 6b
SecondaryNi3(HITP)2electrical conductivity2 and 40 S cm^-1 for pellet and film conductivity, respectivelyporous conductive MOF; pellet and film values reported in review
Text · Range
No verified corpus mapping1616 · Electronic structures and charge transport mechanisms · Figure 2g
SecondaryNi3(HITP)2FET hole mobility48.6 cm2 V^-1 s^-1p-type depletion behaviour; BG-TC device
Text · Exact Reported
research_00151620 · Conductive MOFs/CPs for FETs · Figure 7e
SecondaryNi3(HITP)2FET on/off ratio2 x 10^3p-type depletion behaviour; BG-TC device
Text · Exact Reported
research_00151620 · Conductive MOFs/CPs for FETs · Figure 7e
SecondaryZn2(TTFTB)intrinsic mobility0.2 cm2 V^-1 s^-1FP-TRMC measurement; porous conductive 3D MOF
Text · Exact Reported
research_00301615 · Electronic structures and charge transport mechanisms

Research gaps

Open questions are presented as review-author priorities, not conclusions from the primary database.

conductivity and mobility measurement

High

Different characterisation methods can give inconsistent or overestimated conductivity and mobility data, potentially misleading further research.

Proposed direction: Standardise and normalise electronic property measurements and mobility extraction for MOFs/CPs.

1624 · Outlook

photovoltaic MOF/CP devices

Medium

Although semiconducting MOFs/CPs have tunable band gaps and photoresponse features, photovoltaic development has been slow.

Proposed direction: Investigate light absorption, exciton dissociation, charge transport, and interface engineering in conductive MOF/CP active layers.

1623 · Conductive MOFs/CPs for OPVs and Photodetectors

unreported transistor-based photoresponse devices

Medium

The review states that transistor-based photoresponse or photodetector devices of conductive MOFs/CPs had not yet been reported.

Proposed direction: Develop conductive MOF/CP phototransistors and transistor-based photodetectors.

1624 · Outlook

rational design of transport pathways

High

It remains unclear how to rationally construct conductive MOFs/CPs that achieve high charge transport and high device performance.

Proposed direction: Examine metal and linker conjugation separately and together, including metal-linker orbital overlap, electron delocalisation, noncovalent interactions, and redox control.

1623 · Outlook

device-appropriate conductivity

Medium

Some high-conductivity MOFs/CPs show metallic rather than semiconductor behaviour, which can be undesirable for FETs and other switching devices.

Proposed direction: Tune electronic properties so device materials have appropriate carrier density, bandgap, mobility, and on/off behaviour.

1624 · Outlook

sensor mechanism understanding

Medium

The review notes that observed sensing responses in conductive MOF arrays are not fully understood.

Proposed direction: Separate charge-transfer, hydrogen-bonding, adsorption, swelling, and heat-capacity-linked effects in sensor responses.

1618 · Conductive MOFs/CPs for Chemiresistive Sensors · Figure 6b

high-quality single crystals

High

Few conductive MOFs/CPs show truly high conductivity, and most measurements rely on polycrystalline pellets or films with defects and grain boundaries.

Proposed direction: Prioritise high-quality single crystals for intrinsic transport studies and single-crystal device fabrication.

1624 · Outlook

universality of thin-film fabrication

High

There is a scarcity of fabrication methods with good universality for conductive MOF/CP thin films.

Proposed direction: Develop new synthetic strategies, with the authors envisioning light-induced or magnetism-induced self-assembly after careful study.

1624 · Outlook

Cited-study map

Mappings show which printed review references have a verified counterpart in the frozen primary corpus.

Show 36 cited-study records
ReferenceStudyRole and contextCorpus mapping
Ref. 312015A Two-Dimensional pi-d Conjugated Coordination Polymer with Extremely High Electrical Conductivity and Ambipolar Transport Behaviourtransport_benchmark · FET_benchmark · thin_film_deviceUsed for Cu-BHT film conductivity, ambipolar FET mobility, and as a caution that very high conductivity can impair switching.research_0006
Ref. 322018Superconductivity in a Copper(II)-Based Coordination Polymer with Perfect Kagome Structuresuperconductivity_context · outlookUsed for superconductivity and Ag-for-Cu substitution context in the review's outlook and high-conductivity discussion.Unmapped
Ref. 362004Metal-Organic Frameworks: A New Class of Porous Materialsdefinition_scopeCited in defining porous coordination polymers / MOFs.Unmapped
Ref. 372004Functional Porous Coordination Polymersdefinition_scopeCited in defining MOFs as porous crystalline coordination polymers.Unmapped
Ref. 382013pi-Conjugated Nickel Bis(dithiolene) Complex Nanosheetthin_film_synthesis · material_familyUsed as an air-liquid interfacial synthesis example of single-layer or few-layer nickel bis(dithiolene) nanosheets.Unmapped
Ref. 412009Electroconductive Porous Coordination Polymer Cu[Cu(pdt)2] Composed of Donor and Acceptor Building Unitshistorical_milestone · transport_benchmarkPioneer conductive porous MOF used as the starting benchmark in the review's historical narrative.research_0201
Ref. 422011Electronic Transport in Organic Materials: Comparison of Band Theory with Percolation/(Variable Range) Hopping Theorytransport_mechanismCited for the general band-like versus hopping transport framework.Unmapped
Ref. 432018High-Mobility Band-Like Charge Transport in a Semiconducting Two-Dimensional Metal-Organic Frameworktransport_benchmark · photodetector_precursorCited for band-like charge transport and high TRTS mobility in a semiconducting 2D MOF.research_0001
Ref. 442013Mn2(2,5-disulfhydrylbenzene-1,4-dicarboxylate): A Microporous Metal-Organic Framework with Infinite (-Mn-S-)infinity Chains and High Intrinsic Charge Mobilitytransport_mechanismUsed as a hopping-transport example in a 3D microporous MOF.research_0011
Ref. 502014High Electrical Conductivity in Ni3(2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenylene)2, a Semiconducting Metal-Organic Graphene Analoguetransport_benchmark · material_familyCited for conductivity of Ni3(HITP)2 and as a major HXTP/HITP conductive MOF example.Unmapped
Ref. 592014High Charge Carrier Mobility in Two Dimensional Indium(III) Isophthalic Acid Based FrameworksFET_benchmark · PMD_strategyUsed in the review's Table 1 as an early PMD-fabricated FET entry.Unmapped
Ref. 632012High Charge Mobility in a Tetrathiafulvalene-Based Microporous Metal-Organic Frameworktransport_benchmark · 3D_MOFUsed for the first porous conductive 3D MOF example and FP-TRMC intrinsic mobility benchmark.research_0030
Ref. 782018Electron Delocalization and Charge Mobility as a Function of Reduction in a Metal-Organic Frameworkredox_modulation · FET_benchmark · anisotropy_caveatUsed for redox-controlled conductivity, electron mobility, and anisotropic charge transport in a 3D MOF FET context.research_0029
Ref. 822020Electrical Conductivity in a Porous, Cubic Rare-Earth Catecholateisotropic_conduction_contextUsed where the review contrasts anisotropy with the goal of isotropic electrical conduction.research_0007
Ref. 832016Chemical Principles for Electroactive Metal-Organic Frameworkselectronic_structure · DFT_contextUsed for the MOF-5 band-gap and DOS example in Figure 2f.Unmapped
Ref. 852018Highly Conducting Neutral Coordination Polymer with Infinite Two-Dimensional Silver-Sulfur Networkstransport_benchmark · interfacial_synthesisUsed for Ag-BHT conductivity and for liquid-liquid interfacial synthesis morphology in Figure 4a.research_0735
Ref. 862020Electronic Structure Modeling of Metal-Organic FrameworksDFT_context · measurement_interpretationCited for using electronic structure modelling before charge-transport measurements.Unmapped
Ref. 892017An Updated Roadmap for the Integration of Metal-Organic Frameworks with Electronic Devices and Chemical Sensorsthin_film_device · sensor_contextSupports the device-integration requirement for controlled working samples.Unmapped
Ref. 922011Interfacial Synthesis of Hollow Metal-Organic Framework Capsules Demonstrating Selective Permeabilityinterfacial_synthesisUsed as a liquid-liquid interfacial synthesis example for uniform MOF membranes.Unmapped
Ref. 932019Field Effect Transistor Based on Proton Conductive Metal Organic Framework (CuBTC)PMD_strategy · FET_benchmarkUsed for the PMD method and Table 1 FET entry based on proton-conductive CuBTC.research_0162
Ref. 942017Layer-by-Layer Assembled Conductive Metal-Organic Framework Nanofilms for Room-Temperature Chemiresistive SensingLPE_strategy · sensor_contextUsed for spray LPE growth of conductive MOF nanofilms with controlled thickness and roughness.research_0115
Ref. 952007Step-by-Step Route for the Synthesis of Metal-Organic FrameworksLPE_strategyCited as the establishment of LPE for surface-supported MOF/CP thin films.Unmapped
Ref. 982015Chemiresistive Sensor Arrays from Conductive 2D Metal-Organic Frameworkssensor_benchmarkUsed for conductive 2D MOF sensor arrays and VOC classification performance.research_0145
Ref. 992019Chemiresistive Detection of Gaseous Hydrocarbons and Interrogation of Charge Transport in Cu[Ni(2,3-pyrazinedithiolate)2] by Gas Adsorptionsensor_context · charge_transportUsed for guest-inclusion sensitivity and hydrocarbon sensing in a 3D conductive MOF.research_0052
Ref. 1002020A Dual-Ligand Porous Coordination Polymer Chemiresistor with Modulated Conductivity and Porositysensor_benchmark · dual_ligand_designUsed for dual-ligand MOF chemiresistor conductivity, porosity, and NH3 LOD benchmarks.research_0793
Ref. 1012015Cu3(hexaiminotriphenylene)2: An Electrically Conductive 2D Metal-organic Framework for Chemiresistive Sensingsensor_benchmarkUsed for the Cu3(HITP)2 NH3 chemiresistive detection benchmark.research_0002
Ref. 1152017Porous Field-Effect Transistors Based on a Semiconductive Metal-Organic FrameworkFET_benchmark · thin_film_deviceUsed for Ni3(HITP)2 porous MOF FET mobility, on/off ratio, and device fabrication.research_0015
Ref. 1212007Applications for Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs) as Quantum Dot SemiconductorsOPV_contextUsed as one of the earliest porous MOF photoactive-layer examples in photovoltaics.Unmapped
Ref. 1222011Photochemical Response of Commercial MOFs: Al2(BDC)3 and its Use as Active Material in Photovoltaic DevicesOPV_contextUsed for Al2(BDC)3 photovoltaic active-material discussion and the review's caveat about evidence for semiconductor behaviour.Unmapped
Ref. 1232014Cu-Based Metal-Organic Frameworks for Photovoltaic ApplicationOPV_benchmark · doping_contextUsed for iodine-doped Cu MOF photovoltaic device conductivity and PCE context.Unmapped
Ref. 1242017Novel Solid-State Solar Cell Based on Hole-Conducting MOF-Sensitizer Demonstrating Power Conversion Efficiency of 2.1%OPV_benchmark · hole_transportUsed for Co-DAPV hole mobility and solid-state solar-cell PCE benchmark.research_0231
Ref. 1252020Demonstration of a Broadband Photodetector Based on a Two-Dimensional Metal-Organic Frameworkphotodetector_benchmarkUsed for proof-of-concept broadband photodetection from a conductive 2D MOF.Unmapped
Ref. 12620202D Semiconducting Metal-Organic Framework Thin Films for Organic Spin Valvesspintronics_benchmark · thin_film_deviceUsed for the first reported 2D conductive MOF organic spin valve demonstration.research_0129
Ref. 1402018Organic Semiconductor Crystalssingle_crystal_context · outlookCited as an analogue for why high-quality single crystals can guide MOF/CP transport studies.Unmapped
Ref. 1422005Hall Effect in the Accumulation Layers on the Surface of Organic Semiconductorsmeasurement_caveat · mobility_extractionCited in the review's warning that mobility extraction and Hall measurements need standardisation.Unmapped
Ref. 1432018Critical Assessment of Charge Mobility Extraction in FETsmeasurement_caveat · mobility_extractionCited for the review's concern that extracted charge mobility can be erroneous or overestimated.Unmapped